journal article·2002-06

An optimization procedure for the pultrusion process based on a finite element formulation

R. M. L. Coelho, V. M. A. Calado

Polymer Composites· Volume 23· Issue 3
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Composite materials are manufactured by different processes. In all, the process variables have to be analyzed in order to obtain a part with uniform mechanical properties. In the pultrusion process, two variables are the most important: the pulling speed of resin‐impregnated fibers and the temperature profile (boundary condition) imposed on the mold wall. Mathematical modeling of this process results in partial differential equations that are solved here by a detailed procedure based on the Galerkin weighted residual finite element method. The combination of the Picard and Newton‐Raphson methods with an analytical Jacobian calculation proves to be robust, and a mesh adaptation procedure is presented in order to avoid integration errors during the process optimization. The two earlier‐mentioned variables are optimized by the Simulated Annealing method with some constraints, such as a minimum degree of cure at the end of the process, and the resin degradation (the part temperature cannot be higher than the resin degradation temperature at any time during the whole process). Herein, the proposed objective function is an economic criterion instead of the pulling speed of resin‐impregnated fibers, used in the majority of papers.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Material Mechanics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (17)

Show source-provided references
1. Calado V. M. A. · 1999 · 32
2. 10.1002/pen.1033110.1002/pen.10331 ↗
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(97)00046-810.1016/S1359-835X(97)00046-8 ↗
4. N.RaiandR.Pitchumani Presented at the 1996 ASME International Mechanical Engineering Congress & Exhibition Atlanta (November1996).
5. 10.1016/0009-2509(91)80005-J10.1016/0009-2509(91)80005-J ↗
6. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90074-410.1016/0263-8223(94)90074-4 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.75007040710.1002/pc.750070407 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.75007040810.1002/pc.750070408 ↗
9. 10.1002/pen.76029150210.1002/pen.760291502 ↗
10. 10.1177/00219983930270140210.1177/002199839302701402 ↗
11. 10.1002/aic.69045011310.1002/aic.690450113 ↗
12. 10.1177/00219983940280060110.1177/002199839402800601 ↗
13. 10.1002/pen.76026060410.1002/pen.760260604 ↗
14. 10.1016/0956-7143(95)99648-C10.1016/0956-7143(95)99648-C ↗
15. 10.1016/S0924-0136(98)00052-110.1016/S0924-0136(98)00052-1 ↗
16. Reddy J. N. · 1994
17. Zienkiewicz O. C. · 1989