journal article·2009-12

An investigation on the mechanical and dynamic rheological properties of single and hybrid filler/polypropylene composites based on talc and calcium carbonate

Hamed Azizi, Jalal Faghihi

Polymer Composites· Volume 30· Issue 12
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Some results of experiments on the mechanical and rheological properties of mineral filled polypropylene were presented. Single filler and hybrid filler composites of talc and calcium carbonate (CaCO3) were prepared in a co‐rotating twin‐screw extruder. The effect of filler type, filler content, and coupling agent on the mechanical and rheological properties of the polypropylene were studied. The coupling agent was maleic anhydride‐grafted polypropylene (PP‐g‐MA). It was found that the mechanical properties are affected by filler type, filler concentration, and the interaction between filler and matrix. The tensile strength of the composite is more affected by the talc while the impact strength is influenced mostly by CaCO3 content. The elongation at break of PP/CaCO3 composites was higher than that of PP/talc composites. The incorporation of coupling agent into PP/mineral filler composites increased the mechanical properties. Rheological properties indicated that the complex viscosity and storage modulus of talc filled samples were higher than those of calcium carbonate filled samples while the tan δ was lower. The rheological properties of hybrid‐filler filled sample were more affected by the talc than calcium carbonate. The PP‐g‐MA increased the complex viscosity and storage modulus of both single and hybrid composites. POLYM. COMPOS., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (22)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/978-94-011-4421-610.1007/978-94-011-4421-6 ↗
2. 10.1002/pc.75008020810.1002/pc.750080208 ↗
3. Karger‐kogcis J. · 1995
4. Kazuta M. · J. macromol. Sci. Phys. B · 1984 · 26 · 479
5. 10.1007/BF0037629210.1007/BF00376292 ↗
6. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199605)40:1<51::AID-PI514>3.0.CO;2-I10.1002/(SICI)1097-0126(199605)40:1<51::AID-PI514>3.0.CO;2-I ↗
7. 10.1163/156855499X0030510.1163/156855499X00305 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.76025170410.1002/pen.760251704 ↗
9. 10.1177/09673911020100020310.1177/096739110201000203 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.09.00810.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2006.09.008 ↗
11. 10.1002/pat.14710.1002/pat.147 ↗
12. 10.1016/S0142-9418(01)00047-210.1016/S0142-9418(01)00047-2 ↗
13. 10.1002/app.1354210.1002/app.13542 ↗
14. Chuah A. W. · Eur. Polym. J. · 2000 · 39 · 789
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.01010.1016/j.compscitech.2004.07.010 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.08.00410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2003.08.004 ↗
17. 10.1002/app.1354310.1002/app.13543 ↗
18. 10.1002/pen.2067710.1002/pen.20677 ↗
19. 10.1002/app.2150710.1002/app.21507 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10019000005310.1007/s100190000053 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.00810.1016/j.polymertesting.2005.05.008 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-94-015-9213-010.1007/978-94-015-9213-0 ↗