Preparation, characterization, and mechanical properties of poly( ε ‐caprolactone)/polylactic acid blend composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Mechanical properties of poly( ε ‐caprolactone) (PCL) and polylactic acid (PLA) blend reinforced with Dura and Tenera palm press fibers were studied. Dicumyl peroxide (DCP) was used as compatibilizer in the blend composites. Fourier transforms infrared spectrophotometer (FTIR) and field emission scanning electron microscope (FESEM) was used to study the effect of treatment on the fibers and fiber/matrix adhesion respectively. The uncompatibilized blend composites exhibited higher Young's modulus than the compatibilized blend composites. Impact strength of compatibilized blend composites of Tenera fibers (FM) increased by 161% at 10 wt% fiber load more than the uncompatibilized blend composites at same fiber load. The Dura fibers (FN) enhanced impact strength by 133% at 10 wt% fiber load. Tensile strength increased by 40% for compatibilized FM blend composites. In conclusion, it was observed that DCP incorporation resulted in good interfacial adhesion as revealed by the FESEM micrographs and evidenced in the improved mechanical properties. POLYM. COMPOS., 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s10924-010-0185-010.1007/s10924-010-0185-0 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.07.015 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.cej.2010.11.03910.1016/j.cej.2010.11.039 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.02510.1016/j.compositesa.2011.07.025 ↗
5. 10.1177/073168441038306410.1177/0731684410383064 ↗
6. R.Kumar M.K.Yakubu andR.D.Anandjiwala eXPRESS Polym. Lett. 4 423(2010).10.3144/expresspolymlett.2010.53 ↗
7. Han S.O. · Int. J. Polym. Science · 2012 · 8
8. 10.1201/978020350820610.1201/9780203508206 ↗
9. Rose L.H. · 2012
10. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.07.02110.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2008.07.021 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.016 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2010.12.004 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00100-310.1016/S0266-3538(03)00100-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.00310.1016/j.tifs.2008.07.003 ↗
15. 10.1007/BF0206748110.1007/BF02067481 ↗
16. 10.1021/ie049589r10.1021/ie049589r ↗
17. 10.1016/S0008-6215(03)00236-210.1016/S0008-6215(03)00236-2 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.00910.1016/j.carbon.2011.06.009 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.00310.1016/j.jmbbm.2010.10.003 ↗
20. 10.1177/073168441244109210.1177/0731684412441092 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.supflu.2011.03.01010.1016/j.supflu.2011.03.010 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.01510.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.07.015 ↗
23. 10.1177/073168440935921810.1177/0731684409359218 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2224910.1002/pc.22249 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.030 ↗
26. 10.1007/s00289-011-0509-910.1007/s00289-011-0509-9 ↗
27. 10.1016/S1003-6326(10)60126-410.1016/S1003-6326(10)60126-4 ↗
28. 10.1002/app.2358910.1002/app.23589 ↗
29. 10.1002/pi.215610.1002/pi.2156 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.2906210.1002/app.29062 ↗
31. 10.1002/pc.2046110.1002/pc.20461 ↗
32. 10.1007/s00289-010-0376-910.1007/s00289-010-0376-9 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2008.07.007 ↗