journal article·2000-08

Electron beam curing of polymer composites

J. Raghavan, Mark R. Baillie

Polymer Composites· Volume 21· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Electron‐beam (E‐Beam) curing of an epoxy polymer matrix and its composite (reinforced with IM7 Carbon fibers) was studied using a cationic photoinitiator. Photoinitiator concentration, dose, and process temperature were varied to understand their influence on E‐beam curing. Optimal photoinitiator concentration was found to be 5 phr. The curing was due to a primary α reaction with a strong dependence on dose, and a secondary β reaction with a weak dependence on dose and a strong dependence on initiator concentration. The extent of cure increased rapidly with dose until 100 kGy and it approached a plateau value beyond 100 kGy. This plateau value corresponded to incomplete curing by 27% for resin and 22% for composite at a process‐temperature of 22°C. The causes for incomplete curing appear to be the secondary β reaction and diffusional limitation. Increase in process temperature resulted in higher extent of cure at a dose level. The material used in this study was also found to be thermally curable and the reaction onset temperature (measured in a DSC ramp experiment) reduced from about 150°C at 0 kGy to about 50°C at 30 kGy. This indicates that simultaneous thermal curing during E‐beam curing of resin and composite is possible. After thermal post‐curing, the T g of the E‐beam cured resin increased from 130°C at 200 kGy to a value greater than 370°C and the modulus decreased by 10%. The service temperature and the modulus of the 100% thermally cured resin and the thermally post‐cured (after E‐Beam irradiation) resin were comparable.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Photopolymerization techniques and applications · Dental materials and restorations · Advancements in Photolithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (15)

Show source-provided references
1. V.NarayananandA. B.Scranton Rad Tech Report Nov./Dec. 25 (1997).
2. 10.1016/0969-806X(95)00424-V10.1016/0969-806X(95)00424-V ↗
3. Bezeirs D. · Proc. 35th Int. SAMPE Conf. · 1990 · 35 · 1221
4. 10.1007/BFb002403410.1007/BFb0024034 ↗
5. 10.1002/pola.1989.08027120710.1002/pola.1989.080271207 ↗
6. 10.1002/app.1992.07044010210.1002/app.1992.070440102 ↗
7. 10.1021/cm970031210.1021/cm9700312 ↗
8. Janke C. J. · Proc. 41st Int. SAMPE Symposium · 1996 · 41 · 216
9. Janke C. J. · Proc. 42nd Int. SAMPE Symposium · 1997 · 42 · 477
10. Crasto A. S. · Proc. 42nd Int. SAMPE Symposium · 1997 · 42 · 487
11. Yen A. · Proc. 42nd SAMPE Symposium · 1997 · 42 · 498
12. Cao T. Q. · Proc. 28th Int. SAMPE Technical Conference · 1996 · 28 · 862
13. Lopata V. J. · Proc. 42nd Int. SAMPE Symposium · 1996 · 42
14. 10.1002/app.1990.07041112910.1002/app.1990.070411129 ↗
15. Drzal L. T. · Proc. Int. SAMPE Technical Conference · 1999 · 44 · 633