Crystallization, mechanical properties, and enzymatic degradation of biodegradable poly(ε‐caprolactone) composites with poly(lactic acid) fibers
Source abstract
Abstract
Biodegradable polymer composites based on poly(ɛ‐caprolactone) (PCL) and poly(lactic acid) (PLA) fibers were prepared by melt compounding. The effects of PLA fibers on the crystallization, mechanical properties, and enzymatic degradation of PCL composites were investigated. The addition of PLA fibers enhanced the crystallization of PCL due to the heterogeneous nucleation effect of fibers. However, the final crystallinity of the PCL in the composites was little changed in the presence of PLA fibers. With the addition of PLA fibers, significant improvement in storage modulus (E′) of PCL in the composites was achieved. A significant increase in E′ was 173% for the composites as compared to that of the neat PCL at 20°C. With the increase in PLA fibers content, the PCL composites showed decreased elongation and strength at break; however, the tensile yield strength and modulus were increased significantly, indicating that PCL was obviously reinforced by adding PLA fibers. Although the PLA fibers retarded the enzymatic degradation of PCL, it was possible to be completely degraded without much degradation time for PCL blending with suitable amounts of PLA fibers. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:1745–1752, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Polymer Ecomaterials Changchun Institute of Applied Chemistry Chinese Academy of Sciences Changchun 130022 China
University of Chinese Academy of Sciences Beijing 10080 China
College of Life Science Northeast Normal University Changchun 130024 China
Funding
National Science Foundation of China
References (30)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/(SICI)1521-3927(20000201)21:3<117::AID-MARC117>3.0.CO;2-X10.1002/(SICI)1521-3927(20000201)21:3<117::AID-MARC117>3.0.CO;2-X ↗
2. 10.1021/ie202132m10.1021/ie202132m ↗
3. 10.1021/ie202802d10.1021/ie202802d ↗
4. 10.1166/jnn.2011.471410.1166/jnn.2011.4714 ↗
5. 10.1002/polb.2049110.1002/polb.20491 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00229-X10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00229-X ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.03010.1016/j.carbpol.2005.11.030 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.00910.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.02.009 ↗
9. 10.1177/09673911010090050410.1177/096739110100900504 ↗
10. 10.1080/0360255060088756610.1080/03602550600887566 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2214510.1002/pc.22145 ↗
12. 10.1177/09673911030110050210.1177/096739110301100502 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.04.02610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2004.04.026 ↗
14. Cao Y. · Key Eng. Mater. · 2007 · 221 · 334
15. 10.1080/0022234050040829110.1080/00222340500408291 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.01310.1016/j.actbio.2008.05.013 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.02410.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.05.024 ↗
18. 10.1002/app.2942510.1002/app.29425 ↗
19. 10.1002/pen.2318610.1002/pen.23186 ↗
20. 10.1002/mame.20100006310.1002/mame.201000063 ↗
21. 10.1002/pen.2060910.1002/pen.20609 ↗
22. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960627)60:13<2367::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-C10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19960627)60:13<2367::AID-APP8>3.0.CO;2-C ↗
23. 10.1002/pi.109310.1002/pi.1093 ↗
24. 10.1002/app.1142910.1002/app.11429 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2358910.1002/app.23589 ↗
26. 10.1016/0014-3057(72)90109-710.1016/0014-3057(72)90109-7 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2005.10.015 ↗
28. 10.1016/S0032-3861(02)00818-210.1016/S0032-3861(02)00818-2 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.01.10510.1016/j.matchemphys.2012.01.105 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0141-8130(01)00158-110.1016/S0141-8130(01)00158-1 ↗