journal article·2013-06

Impact and flexural properties of stone‐ground wood pulp‐reinforced polypropylene composites

J.P. López, J. Gironès, J.A. Mendez, M.A. Pèlach, F. Vilaseca, P. Mutjé

Polymer Composites· Volume 34· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

This study analyses the flexural and impact strength of polypropylene reinforced with stone ground wood pulp (SGWP) and the effect of a maleated‐polypropylene (MAPP) coupling agent on the mechanical properties of these composites. Composites prepared in the absence of the coupling agent showed a very light positive linear evolution of the flexural strength with the percentage of reinforcing fiber. In contrast, composites that included MAPP in their formulation presented highly noticeable improvements with fiber content. By applying mathematical modeling strategies, the flexural modulus has been analyzed using the Cox–Krenchel model. Similarly, the flexural and tensile strength factors for the reinforcing fiber have been defined and utterly allowed for the determination of intrinsic fiber flexural strength. POLYM. COMPOS., 34:842–848, 2013. © 2013 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Polymer crystallization and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Grup LEPAMAP Departament d'Enginyeria Química Agrària i Tecnologia Agroalimentària Universitat de Girona Campus Montilivi s/n 17071 Girona Spain

References (33)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1023/A:102101392191610.1023/A:1021013921916 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.017 ↗
3. Faruk O. · Prog. Polym. Sci. · 2012 · 11 · 155210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2012.04.003 ↗
4. 10.1515/REVCE.2011.00610.1515/REVCE.2011.006 ↗
5. 10.1002/pen.2132810.1002/pen.21328 ↗
6. 10.1177/073168441244432510.1177/0731684412444325 ↗
7. 10.1002/jsfa.255810.1002/jsfa.2558 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.04310.1016/j.biortech.2007.09.043 ↗
9. 10.1023/A:102574110062810.1023/A:1025741100628 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.01010.1016/j.compositesb.2011.01.010 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2008.12.002 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10853-009-3874-010.1007/s10853-009-3874-0 ↗
13. 10.1007/s10924-006-0042-310.1007/s10924-006-0042-3 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2004.11.004 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01410.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.014 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.01.008 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2010.10.01210.1016/j.compscitech.2010.10.012 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2121710.1002/pc.21217 ↗
19. Lopez J.P. · Bioresources · 2012 · 7 · 318810.15376/biores.7.3.3188-3200 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2007.10.021 ↗
21. 10.1023/A:101865121851510.1023/A:1018651218515 ↗
22. 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
23. Krenchel H. · 1964
24. 10.1002/pc.1005510.1002/pc.10055 ↗
25. Lopez J.P. · Bioresources · 2011 · 6 · 503710.15376/biores.6.4.5037-5049 ↗
26. Crawford R.J. · 1998
27. 10.15376/biores.7.4.4586-459910.15376/biores.7.4.4586-4599 ↗
28. 10.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-910.1016/0022-5096(65)90035-9 ↗
29. Kelly A. · 1964
30. 10.1007/BF0055069810.1007/BF00550698 ↗
31. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00150-110.1016/S1359-835X(02)00150-1 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2008.08.003 ↗
33. Michell A.J. · Appita J. · 1978 · 31 · 347