journal article·2009-10Open access

Natural fiber hybrid composites—A comparison between compression molding and resin transfer molding

Maries Idicula, P.A. Sreekumar, Kuruvilla Joseph, Sabu Thomas

Polymer Composites· Volume 30· Issue 10

Abstract

Abstract Short randomly oriented intimately mixed banana and sisal hybrid fiber‐reinforced polyester composites having varying volume fraction of fiber were fabricated by compression molding (CM) and resin transfer molding (RTM) techniques by keeping the volume ratio of banana and sisal, 1:1. The static mechanical properties such as tensile, flexural, and impact behavior were studied. The dynamic mechanical properties were also evaluated. Resin transfer molded composites showed enhanced static and dynamic mechanical properties, compared with the compression molded samples. To analyze the fracture surface morphology of the composites, scanning electron microscopy (SEM) was also performed. Water sorption studies revealed that the water uptake of RTM fabricated composites was lower than that of the compression molded composites. The void content of the RTM composites was also found to be lower than that of the other one. POLYM. COMPOS., 2009. © 2009 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (32)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2025010.1002/pc.20250 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2005.09.001 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00005-210.1016/S0266-3538(02)00005-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.01710.1016/j.compositesa.2003.09.017 ↗
5. 10.1002/app.2198010.1002/app.21980 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.00910.1016/j.matdes.2004.11.009 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.00410.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.004 ↗
8. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00021-510.1016/S0266-3538(01)00021-5 ↗
9. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00098-210.1016/S0266-3538(02)00098-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-810.1016/S0266-3538(03)00084-8 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2007.01.005 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2006.10.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2006.10.009 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.07.008 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.12.008 ↗
15. 10.1002/pi.155710.1002/pi.1557 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2004.03.010 ↗
17. 10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00177-X10.1016/S1359-835X(02)00177-X ↗
18. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00064-110.1016/S0266-3538(01)00064-1 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.02810.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.07.028 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.msea.2007.04.04310.1016/j.msea.2007.04.043 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.01210.1016/j.compositesb.2007.02.012 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.00610.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.006 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0266-3538(01)00091-410.1016/S0266-3538(01)00091-4 ↗
24. 10.1023/A:102653810720010.1023/A:1026538107200 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.00110.1016/j.compscitech.2003.06.001 ↗
26. 10.1016/S1359-835X(00)00008-710.1016/S1359-835X(00)00008-7 ↗
27. Rowell R. · 1998
28. 10.1177/07316840177267863410.1177/073168401772678634 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2006.08.025 ↗
30. 10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981212)70:11<2121::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-Z10.1002/(SICI)1097-4628(19981212)70:11<2121::AID-APP5>3.0.CO;2-Z ↗
31. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00254-310.1016/S0266-3538(02)00254-3 ↗
32. 10.1016/0032-3861(94)90545-210.1016/0032-3861(94)90545-2 ↗