Shielding effectiveness density theory for carbon fiber/nylon 6,6 composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract We present a simple density theory based on first principles that predicts the shielding effectiveness of composite matrix materials at filler loadings near or above the percolation threshold. Such a model has practical applications in electromagnetic interference and radio frequency interference, and is validated here for Fortafil 243 carbon fiber within nylon 6,6. In brief, the theory predicts that the most important parameter on the shielding effectiveness of a sample is the carbon fiber volume percent. At very high filler loadings, experimental results show a weak dependence on the frequency of the wave to be shielded, which may be attributed to enhanced reflection from multiple, coherent scatterers (carbon fiber network). These effects are not considered in our model. Nevertheless, advantages of this model are ease of use and improved predictive capabilities when compared to models previously reported in the literature. Our model performs very well over an electrical resistivity range from 1015 ohm‐cm (at low filler loading levels below the percolation threshold) down to 10−1 ohm‐cm (at high filler loading levels well above the percolation threshold), and can be used to determine filler loadings needed to provide a certain level of shielding of electromagnetic waves. POLYM. COMPOS. 26:671–678, 2005. © 2005 Society of Plastics Engineers
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Electromagnetic wave absorption materials · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (27)
Show source-provided references
1. Donnet J.‐B. · 1993
2. 10.1002/adv.1002510.1002/adv.10025 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.75008010210.1002/pc.750080102 ↗
4. White D.R.J. · 1971
5. “Measuring the Electromagnetic Shielding Effectiveness of Planar Materials ” ASTM Standard D 4935‐89 Reapproved 1994 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia PA(1996).
6. W.C.Bushko V.K.Stokes andJ.Wilson Proceedings of the Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical Conference New York 1499(1999).
7. 10.1002/adv.1984.06004030510.1002/adv.1984.060040305 ↗
8. 10.1002/pen.76017120610.1002/pen.760171206 ↗
9. J.Versieck Proceedings of the Society of Plastics Engineers Annual Technical Conference Orlando FL 1438(2000).
10. M.Murthy 4th Electronics Society for the Advancement of Material and Process Engineering Electronics Conference 806(1990).
11. 10.1002/adv.1995.06014020510.1002/adv.1995.060140205 ↗
12. Casey K.F. · IEEE Int. Symp. Elect. Compat. · 1978 · 228
13. 10.1109/8.1870910.1109/8.18709 ↗
14. 10.1109/15.48568910.1109/15.485689 ↗
15. 10.1109/15.24939210.1109/15.249392 ↗
16. Akzo Nobel Fortafil Carbon Fibers Technical Data Sheet 931B Rockwood TN37854(1993).
17. 10.1002/adv.1004010.1002/adv.10040 ↗
18. J.A.Heiser “Conductive Shielding Tensile and Impact Properties of Carbon‐Filled Nylon 6 6 Based Resins ” M.S. Thesis Michigan Technological University Houghton MI (2003).10.1002/app.13532 ↗
19. “Standard Test Methods for D‐C Resistance or Conductance of Insulating Materials ” ASTM Standard D257–91 American Society for Testing and Materials Philadelphia PA(1998).
20. 10.1002/pc.1048810.1002/pc.10488 ↗
21. 10.1002/adv.2000410.1002/adv.20004 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.75006010510.1002/pc.750060105 ↗
23. 10.1016/S0304-3886(99)00041-810.1016/S0304-3886(99)00041-8 ↗
24. A.Demain “Thermal Conductivity of Polymer‐Chopped Carbon Fibre Composites ” Ph.D. Dissertation Universite Catholique de Louvain Louvain‐la‐Neuve Belgium (1994).
25. 10.1002/pc.1032410.1002/pc.10324 ↗
26. 10.1002/app.2142610.1002/app.21426 ↗
27. Balanis C.A. · 1989