journal article·1996-12

Bubble transport through constricted capillary tubes with application to resin transfer molding

T. Staffan Lundström

Polymer Composites· Volume 17· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract This paper describes and expounds a theoretical and experimental study of bubble motion through constricted capillary tubes. In the experiment, two liquidfilled capillaries are used. They have unequal radii and are glued together. Gas bubbles are injected into the larger capillary. Then the pressure required to force the bubbles through the constriction is measured for various liquids, bubble lengths, capillary radii and constriction geometry. It appears that the pressure directly follows Young's‐Laplace law for capillary pressure. The results of the study are used to understand the bubble transport through fiber reinforcements, which generally takes place during the manufacturing of composites. The bubbles are carried if: (i) the pressure gradient is high enough, (ii) the surface tension of the liquid is low enough, (iii) the cross‐sectional area of the channels in the reinforcement is sufficiently uniform. The theory reveals that the bubbles are more likely to be trapped on a small scale, i.e. within fiber bundles rather than on a large scale, i.e. between the bundles. It is also concluded that, if the bubbles are trapped at the resin flow front, a converging flow is better for the transport of the voids than a diverging flow.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Innovative Microfluidic and Catalytic Techniques Innovation · Nanofabrication and Lithography Techniques

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (23)

Show source-provided references
1. J. L.Kardos R.Dave andM. P.Dudukovic “Voids in Composites ”Proc. ASME Manufacturing International'88 pp.41–48 Atlanta (1988).
2. 10.1177/00219983830170020410.1177/002199838301700204 ↗
3. Wood R. J. · Proc. Eighth Intern. Conf. Compos. Mater. (ICCM/8) · 1991 · 1 · 10‐M‐1
4. Hayward J. S. · Sampe J. · 1990 · 26 · 39
5. 10.1016/0956-7143(90)90163-Q10.1016/0956-7143(90)90163-Q ↗
6. 10.1177/07316844930120120710.1177/073168449301201207 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.75015010510.1002/pc.750150105 ↗
8. T. S.Lundström “Void formation and Transport in RTM Process ”Proc. 39th Intern. Sampe Symp. Anaheim Calif. (1994).
9. 10.1017/S002211206100016010.1017/S0022112061000160 ↗
10. 10.1017/S002211208600173810.1017/S0022112086001738 ↗
11. 10.1017/S002211209000130610.1017/S0022112090001306 ↗
12. 10.1017/S002211208300339010.1017/S0022112083003390 ↗
13. 10.1002/aic.69035020710.1002/aic.690350207 ↗
14. 10.1017/S002211209400209010.1017/S0022112094002090 ↗
15. Gauglitz St. Laurent andRadke J. Petroleum Technol. 1137(1987).10.2118/16183-PA ↗
16. Batchelor G. K. · 1967 · 63
17. Lide D. R. · 1990
18. 10.1016/0301-9322(95)00026-T10.1016/0301-9322(95)00026-T ↗
19. 10.1016/1359-835X(95)00012-Q10.1016/1359-835X(95)00012-Q ↗
20. 10.1002/aic.69041100910.1002/aic.690411009 ↗
21. Bear J. · 1972
22. B. R.Gebart P.Gudmundson.L. A.Strömbeck andC. Y.Lundemo “An Evaluation of Alternative Injection Strategies in RTM ”Proc. 47th Annual Conf. Composites Institute of The Society of the Plastics Industry (1992).
23. 10.1002/pc.75016050710.1002/pc.750160507 ↗