Analysis and characterization of prepreg tack
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract As part of an engineering analysis and experimental methodology to characterize prepreg tack, a compression‐to‐tension test was optimized to enhance reproducibility and generate intrinsic property data. With the resulting stress‐strain compression and tension data, a theoretical model was developed to describe tack as a bulk viscoelastic property of a prepreg laminate stack. Using the viscoelastic analysis, four intrinsic material parameters to characterize prepreg tack could be defined. These were 1) relaxed modulus, 2) unrelaxed modulus, 3) relaxation time, and 4) initial void content of the prepreg stack. Relaxed and unrelaxed moduli of the prepreg stack were independent of temperature, while the relaxation time was highly dependent on temperature and matrix viscosity. In addition, the relaxation time was found to be influenced by resin/fiber content and prepreg surface characteristics, which also influenced the void content of the prepreg stack. Using these measured parameters, good agreement was observed between theory and experimental data for both the stress‐strain curve of the tack test and the simplified compression tack index (CTI*), defined as the ratio of output energy of the prepreg stack during tensile unloading to input energy during compressive loading.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. ASTMD69–85 “Standard Test Method for Friction Tapes” (1985).
2. ASTMD903–49 “Standard Test Method for Peel or Stripping Strength of Adhesive Bonds” (1983).
3. ASTMD2979–71 “Standard Test Method for Pressure‐Sensitive Tack of Adhesives Using An Inverted Probe Machine” (1982).
4. ASTMD3121–73 “Standard Test Method for Tack of Pressure‐Sensitive Adhesives by Rolling Ball” (1984).
5. Bekk J. · Deutscher Drucker · 1938 · 44 · 450
6. 10.1021/i560097a01910.1021/i560097a019 ↗
7. Stefan J. · Sitzber. Akad. Wiss. Wien, Math.‐naturw. Kl., Abt. II · 1874 · 69 · 713
8. 10.1098/rspa.1954.012510.1098/rspa.1954.0125 ↗
9. 10.1016/0095-8522(53)90014-210.1016/0095-8522(53)90014-2 ↗
10. 10.1016/0095-8522(58)90029-110.1016/0095-8522(58)90029-1 ↗
11. Voyutskii S. S. · 1963
12. Josefowitz D. · India Rubber World · 1942 · 106 · 33
13. Dahlquist C. A. · 1969
14. Salomon G. · 1965
15. Wake W. C. · 1961
16. 10.1007/978-1-4613-9786-1_310.1007/978-1-4613-9786-1_3 ↗
17. Andrews E. H. · Proc. R. Soc. London · 1973 · 332 · 385
18. 10.1002/pol.1971.16009040810.1002/pol.1971.160090408 ↗
19. 10.1007/BF0142188710.1007/BF01421887 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.1976.07020110210.1002/app.1976.070201102 ↗
21. Dahlquist C. A. · 1969
22. 10.1080/0360255730854501810.1080/03602557308545018 ↗
23. K. J.Ahn. Doctoral dissertation Department of Chemical Engineering University of Washington Seattle Wash. (1990).
24. T.Pelton M.Wilhelm K. J.Ahn andJ. C.Seferis in preparation (1991).
25. Meissonnier J. · SAMPE Q. · 1989 · 20 · 55
26. W. J.Babbitt Master's thesis Department of Chemical Engineering University of Washington Seattle Wash. (1990).
27. Bonhomme L. L. · Proc. Ann. Conf., Soc. Adv. Mater, Proc. Eng. · 1988 · 33 · 944
28. Seferis J. C. · Proc. Ann. Conf., Soc. Adv. Mater. Proc. Eng. · 1989 · 34 · 63
29. 10.1021/ie50499a04110.1021/ie50499a041 ↗
30. 10.1002/app.1989.07037110310.1002/app.1989.070371103 ↗
31. Ward I. M. · 1983
32. 10.1080/0022233890805385010.1080/00222338908053850 ↗
33. W. E.Lawrence J.‐A. E.Manson J. C.Seferis J. W.Gillespie Jr. andR. B.Pipes Proc. Ann. Tech. Conf. Am. Soc. Comp. p.401(1990).
34. 10.1002/pc.75012040810.1002/pc.750120408 ↗
35. 10.1007/BF0191309810.1007/BF01913098 ↗