Permeability characterization. Part 2: Flow behavior in multiple‐layer preforms
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Within the resin transfer molding (RTM) process, flow is generally characterized by the progression of a distinct, nonuniform flow front into the preform as a function of time. The flow front progression introduces unsaturated characteristics into RTM flow fields. As a result, the definition of an effective in‐plane permeability ( K eff ) is used to determine the permeability of actual preforms as they fill with fluid. This K eff expression expands upon the original definition of Darcy's law by generalizing its applicability to unsaturated creeping flows. Results of experimentally obtained K eff for flow in single‐layer preforms have been detailed for two common RTM materials, a random mat and a 3‐D weave, in Part 1. In this paper (Part 2), we characterize the unsaturated and saturated permeabilities of multiple‐layer preforms constructed from the random mat and 3‐D weave materials characterized in Part 1. This work identifies the apparent permeability characteristics of a specific unsaturated multiple‐layer flow that demonstrates behavior inherent to this important class of heterogeneous flows. Also, parallels are drawn between the unsaturated permeability behavior of complex 3‐D weave materials and multiple‐layer preforms.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics · Mechanical Behavior of Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (22)
Show source-provided references
1. Johnson C. F. · 1988
2. G.BatchandS.Cumiskey 45th Annual Conference Composites Institute The Society of the Plastics Industry Inc. Session 9‐A (1990).
3. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90071-X10.1016/0263-8223(94)90071-X ↗
4. Parnas R. S. · SAMPE Q. · 1991 · 22 · 53
5. 10.1002/pc.75012030710.1002/pc.750120307 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.75012030810.1002/pc.750120308 ↗
7. F. R.Phelan Jr. Proc. American Society for Composites Seventh Technical Conference 90–102(1992).
8. Bruschke M. V. · SAMPE Q. · 1991 · 22 · 2
9. 10.1177/07316844940130030610.1177/073168449401300306 ↗
10. 10.1016/0263-8223(94)90072-810.1016/0263-8223(94)90072-8 ↗
11. Bear J. · 1972
12. 10.1007/BF0042018910.1007/BF00420189 ↗
13. 10.1177/00405175780480030510.1177/004051757804800305 ↗
14. Gauvin R. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1993 · 39 · 841
15. 10.1002/pc.75010060510.1002/pc.750100605 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.75014020810.1002/pc.750140208 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.75014020910.1002/pc.750140209 ↗
18. 10.1177/00219983870210020710.1177/002199838702100207 ↗
19. 10.1177/00219983870210070510.1177/002199838702100705 ↗
20. Lam R. C. · SPE ANTEC Tech. Papers · 1989 · 35 · 1408
21. 10.1002/pc.75014050410.1002/pc.750140504 ↗
22. M. V.Bruschke T. L.Luce andS. G.Advani Proc. Amer. Soc. Composites Seventh Technical Conference 103–112(1992).