journal article·1991-02

The dependence of interfacial shear strength on matrix and interphase properties

Venkatesh Rao, Lawrence T. Drzal

Polymer Composites· Volume 12· Issue 1
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract Experiments were conducted to determine the dependence of the interfacial shear strength on the bulk material matrix properties using model compounds based on epoxy/amine chemistry. AS4, carbon fibers were used as the subject for these measurements with both a difunctional epoxy (DGEBA) system as well as a tetrafunctional epoxy (MY720) system. Amine curing agents were carefully chosen to produce matrices which produced a range of matrix properties from brittle, elastic to ductile, plastic. The fiber‐matrix interfacial chemistry was constant throughout this study by always using a stoichiometric amount of curing agent. The results indicate that, for both the difunctional as well as the tetrafunctional epoxy system, the interfacial shear strength (as determined by the fragmentation test) decreases nonlinearly with decreasing modulus of the matrix. Linear elastic analysis yields a nearly linear relationship, for both systems, between the interfacial shear strength and the product of strain to final break and the square root of the matrix shear modulus. A linear relationship is also found between the difference in test temperature and glass transition temperature of the cured matrix and the interfacial shear strength. Additionally, the failure mode is seen to remain interfacial as the ductility of the matrix changes.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Composite Material Mechanics · Aluminum Alloys Composites Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (21)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1080/0021846860807122510.1080/00218468608071225 ↗
2. W. D.Bascom L. W.Cordner J. L.Hinkley andN. J.Johnston Proceedings for the American Society for Composites First Technical Conference Dayton Ohio 238(1986).
3. L. J.Broutman 25th Conference of Reinforced Plastics and Composites (RP/C) Paper 13‐B 1 (1970).10.1016/0010-4361(70)90321-6 ↗
4. 10.1007/978-3-642-70182-510.1007/978-3-642-70182-5 ↗
5. 10.1088/0508-3443/3/3/30210.1088/0508-3443/3/3/302 ↗
6. 10.1515/POLYENG.1987.7.3.19710.1515/POLYENG.1987.7.3.197 ↗
7. 10.1007/BF0082321810.1007/BF00823218 ↗
8. Rosen B. W. · 1965
9. N. F.Dow “Study of Stresses near a Discontinuity in a Filament‐Reinforced Composite Metal ” General Electronic Comp. Report TIS R635D61 (1963).
10. K. J.Hook R. K.Agrawal andL. T.Drzal submitted toJ. Adhesion.
11. 10.1016/0008-6223(77)90028-810.1016/0008-6223(77)90028-8 ↗
12. University of Dayton Research Institute “Improved Materials for Composite and Adhesive Joints ” Annual Progress Report AFWAL TR‐82–4182 September 1981–August1982.
13. L. T.Drzal M. J.Rich J. D.Camping andW. J.Park 35th RP/C Paper 20‐C 1(1980).
14. 10.1080/0021846830807490110.1080/00218468308074901 ↗
15. L. T.Drzal “Interfacial Behavior of Aramid and Graphite Fibers in Epoxy Matrix ” 15th National SAMPE Technical Conference Cincinnati (1983).
16. Timeshenko S. · 1951
17. J. M.WhitneyandL. T.Drzal “Axi‐Symmetric Stress Distribution Around an Isolated Fiber Fragment ”ASTM STP (in press).
18. J. S.Kalantar master's thesis Michigan State University (1988).
19. Adamson W. A. · 1982
20. Nielsen L. E. · 1974
21. J. S.KalantarandL. T.Drzal J. Mater. Sci.(in press).