Multi ‐Axial Compression Analysis of Novel Three‐Dimensional Six‐Directional Braided Composites by Structural Optimization Design
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT This study targets stepwise 3D6d braided composites by establishing a constraint PSO‐SVM surrogate coupled with NSGA‐III optimization and TOPSIS selection to link true geometry and damage evolution with efficient multi‐objective design. A lift rod‐based densification route adjusts yarn insertion direction and preform density, fully parameterizing insertion density, density zone length, braiding pitch, and six directional yarn tension. Across 72 designs, the optimized architecture raises compressive strengths in X , Y , and Z by 26%, 19%, and 14% with concurrent increases in moduli. Measured strengths are 164, 224, and 268 MPa, and measured moduli are 5.9, 8.7, and 9.3 GPa, while coefficients of variation for modulus and strength are 2.5 × 10 −1 and 4 × 10 −1 , indicating improved near isotropy. Predictions for the experiment are below 5%. DIC and micro CT reveal a progressive failure governed by interfacial shear and fiber buckling, confirming the reliability of the model and the process strategy. The surrogate‐driven optimization framework offers practical guidance for integrated structure process design of high‐performance 3D braided composites.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics College of Mechanical and Electrical Engineering Nanjing China
State Key Laboratory of Mechanics and Control for Mechanical Structures Nanjing China
Jiangsu Innovation Center of Advanced Composite Technology and Equipment Nanjing China
School of Fiber Engineering and Equipment Technology Jiangnan University Wuxi China
References (28)
Show source-provided references
1. Brown R. T. · 1986
2. Ko F. K. · 1989 · 129
3. 10.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-210.1016/S1359-835X(99)00034-2 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.10870310.1016/j.polymertesting.2025.108703 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11868010.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118680 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10182510.1016/j.coco.2024.101825 ↗
7. A.BogdanovichandD.Mungalov “Manufacturing and Properties of 3‐D Braided Carbon Fiber Stiffeners ” in47th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 14th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 7th(2006): 2166.10.2514/6.2006-2166 ↗
8. 10.1177/004051751245076610.1177/0040517512450766 ↗
9. 10.1186/s10033-022-00709-010.1186/s10033-022-00709-0 ↗
10. 10.1007/s10443-021-09963-210.1007/s10443-021-09963-2 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.tws.2025.11305310.1016/j.tws.2025.113053 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11757910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117579 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11820610.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118206 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11740910.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117409 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10088410.1016/j.coco.2021.100884 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.eml.2021.10129110.1016/j.eml.2021.101291 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2011.05.042 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2025.11900010.1016/j.compstruct.2025.119000 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.13959310.1016/j.conbuildmat.2024.139593 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10443-012-9279-210.1007/s10443-012-9279-2 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2011.04.017 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.cja.2020.05.01710.1016/j.cja.2020.05.017 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10810810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108108 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.06510.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.065 ↗
25. 10.1177/004051752098238510.1177/0040517520982385 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matdes.2025.11361710.1016/j.matdes.2025.113617 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11075810.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110758 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11830510.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118305 ↗