Performance Enhancement of Epoxy‐Adhesive Co‐Cured Joints With GPTMS ‐Modified Stainless Steel Mesh: A Comparative Study of Interleaved and Conventional Reinforcements
Source abstract
Abstract
ABSTRACT Adhesive bonding creates strong, lightweight, and durable connections in the automotive and aerospace industries. The current study aims to enhance the shear and vibrational properties of single lap joints (SLJ) by incorporating various types of reinforcements, such as Mesh‐reinforced SLJ (MSLJ), Interleaved Mesh SLJ (IMSLJ), GPTMS‐treated Mesh SLJ (GMSLJ), and GPTMS‐treated Interleaved Mesh SLJ (GIMSLJ), with pure epoxy adhesive. The present study compares the performance of untreated stainless steel 304 wire mesh (SS 304) SLJ with those treated with 3‐Glycidyloxypropyl‐trimethoxysilane (GPTMS) through conventional methods (over the adhesive layer) and interleaved approaches. The results indicate that GIMSLJ and GMSLJ achieved improvements in shear strength of 17.74% and 9.43%, respectively, compared to MSLJ. Furthermore, the natural frequencies measured for GIMSLJ and GMSLJ were recorded at 62.3 and 58.9 Hz, both of which were higher than those of the other joints tested. An ANOVA analysis confirmed that various reinforcement SLJ significantly impacts shear and vibrational performance ( p < 0.05).
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Corrosion Behavior and Inhibition · Structural Analysis of Composite Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Mechanical Engineering, Vellore Institute of Technology Vellore Tamilnadu India
Department of Mechanical Engineering Amrita Vishwa Vidyapeetham Amritapuri India
Department of Mechanical Engineering Vel Tech Rangarajan Dr. Sagunthala R&D Institute of Science and Technology Avadi Tamilnadu India
References (25)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.coco.2019.06.01110.1016/j.coco.2019.06.011 ↗
2. 10.1080/01694243.2024.236229710.1080/01694243.2024.2362297 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10087810.1016/j.coco.2021.100878 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2845210.1002/pc.28452 ↗
5. 10.1080/01694243.2024.242242610.1080/01694243.2024.2422426 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2025.13805310.1016/j.matlet.2025.138053 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.matlet.2024.13754210.1016/j.matlet.2024.137542 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10336510.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103365 ↗
9. 10.1515/mt‐2022‐028410.1515/mt‐2022‐0284 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12206‐016‐0507‐910.1007/s12206‐016‐0507‐9 ↗
11. 10.1007/s12633‐018‐9762‐y10.1007/s12633‐018‐9762‐y ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2805310.1002/pc.28053 ↗
13. 10.3390/pr1102040610.3390/pr11020406 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.matlet.2023.13471310.1016/j.matlet.2023.134713 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.03810.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.038 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.12010.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.120 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2791110.1002/pc.27911 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.matlet.2024.13658710.1016/j.matlet.2024.136587 ↗
19. 10.1002/cphc.20190044310.1002/cphc.201900443 ↗
20. 10.1166/sam.2020.367210.1166/sam.2020.3672 ↗
21. 10.1007/s40032‐012‐0020‐610.1007/s40032‐012‐0020‐6 ↗
22. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0674110.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06741 ↗
23. 10.1080/00405000.2019.165115510.1080/00405000.2019.1651155 ↗
24. 10.1007/s42452‐019‐0340‐810.1007/s42452‐019‐0340‐8 ↗
25. 10.1007/s40430‐021‐02920‐x10.1007/s40430‐021‐02920‐x ↗