journal article·2025-05-23

Investigation of Low‐Velocity Impact and In‐Plane Compression Responses of Crumb Rubber‐Reinforced Kevlar Sandwich Composite: Experimental, Analytical and Numerical Approaches

Venkatesh Chenrayan, A. Saravanakumar, Kiran Shahapurkar, Panneerselvam Natarajan

Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Heavier monolithic construction panels pose greater challenges to energy conservation in the automobile, aerospace, and locomotive sectors. A novel lightweight sandwich polymer composite has been proposed to address the issue. The waste tire‐derived crumb rubber (CR) particles were employed for the reinforcement of the core of the Kevlar sandwich epoxy composite in four different composition variations (0, 5, 10, and15 wt.%). A low‐velocity impact analysis was performed experimentally to assess the impact responses. An intense bonding of CR particles with the cover sheet was authenticated by the surface topography of CR. An energy‐balance analytical model was implemented to validate the experimental findings. Further, a third layer of validation was attempted through a finite element numerical approach. The experimental approach to impact response estimation reveals that 87.86% and 17.42% of excess energy absorption and backside deformation are recorded for higher CR content (15 wt.%) variants than the neat sandwich specimen. The analytical and numerical predictions are in close concurrence with the experimental findings. The macroscopic damage assessment result declares the existence of evident delamination followed by matrix cracking for the neat specimen. A 2.48 times higher residual compressive strength with extended straining was observed from the in‐plane compression test after the impact for a higher CR variant (15 wt.%) than the neat one. A failure assessment after the in‐plane compression manifests the remarkable delamination and core failure of the neat sandwich composite.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre of Excellence‐Advanced Materials Synthesis (CoE‐AMS), (AU‐STIC), Department of Mechanical Engineering Alliance School of Applied Engineering, Alliance University Bengaluru India

Department of Mechanical Engineering Dhirajlal Gandhi College of Technology Salem India

References (48)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/polym1303042310.3390/polym13030423 ↗
2. 10.1680/emr.13.0005010.1680/emr.13.00050 ↗
3. 10.1080/15376494.2021.194144810.1080/15376494.2021.1941448 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2625210.1002/pc.26252 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.ast.2023.10827610.1016/j.ast.2023.108276 ↗
6. 10.1002/pc.2720110.1002/pc.27201 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.12149610.1016/j.conbuildmat.2020.121496 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11476610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114766 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2722110.1002/pc.27221 ↗
10. 10.3390/polym1419404710.3390/polym14194047 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10888110.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108881 ↗
12. 10.1177/1528083721106088810.1177/15280837211060888 ↗
13. 10.1016/B978-0-12-823979-7.00002-810.1016/B978-0-12-823979-7.00002-8 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.tws.2021.10773810.1016/j.tws.2021.107738 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.10656010.1016/j.ijfatigue.2021.106560 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.11628910.1016/j.jenvman.2022.116289 ↗
17. 10.1002/pc.2537310.1002/pc.25373 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2025.02.07910.1016/j.jmrt.2025.02.079 ↗
19. 10.30919/es8d67010.30919/es8d670 ↗
20. 10.1088/2631-6331/acf11410.1088/2631-6331/acf114 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2704310.1002/pc.27043 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10855410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108554 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11442810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114428 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10718610.1016/j.tws.2020.107186 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2023.11672110.1016/j.engstruct.2023.116721 ↗
26. 10.1088/2631‐6331/ac8d7a10.1088/2631‐6331/ac8d7a ↗
27. 10.1177/109963622090886210.1177/1099636220908862 ↗
28. 10.1177/0021998322107715210.1177/00219983221077152 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2003.09.035 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.00810.1016/j.compstruct.2011.04.008 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.01510.1016/j.compscitech.2009.02.015 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.02510.1016/j.compstruct.2013.07.025 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2895210.1002/pc.28952 ↗
34. 10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:4(235)10.1061/(ASCE)0893-1321(2008)21:4(235) ↗
35. 10.1108/MMMS-09-2019-016410.1108/MMMS-09-2019-0164 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10820710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108207 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.12610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.126 ↗
38. 10.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_610.1007/978-94-007-5329-7_6 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12221-020-1418-z10.1007/s12221-020-1418-z ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.01410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2015.10.014 ↗
41. 10.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943‐5576.000035710.1061/(ASCE)SC.1943‐5576.0000357 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.00510.1016/j.compositesb.2018.01.005 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.01910.1016/j.compositesb.2017.05.019 ↗
44. C.SunandS.Yang “Contact Law and Impact Responses of Laminated Composites ”1980.
45. 10.1007/s10443-017-9622-810.1007/s10443-017-9622-8 ↗
46. 10.1002/pc.2306410.1002/pc.23064 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.cma.2004.02.01910.1016/j.cma.2004.02.019 ↗
48. 10.1016/S0045-7825(98)00107-810.1016/S0045-7825(98)00107-8 ↗