Low velocity impact study of polyurethane foam in‐situ foamed honeycomb sandwich structure
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract To enhance the impact resistance of aluminum honeycomb sandwich structure, the honeycomb was foamed in situ using polyurethane foam (PU). Experimental and numerical studies were conducted on the drop weight impact response of empty honeycomb sandwich structure (SH) and PU‐reinforced honeycomb sandwich structure (SHP), and scanning electron microscope (SEM) was conducted to acquire impacted areas, and the peak load was theoretically predicted. The results showed that PU with a filling density of 140 kg/m 3 not only enhanced the peak load of the honeycomb sandwich structure by 12.83% and its stiffness by 26.7%, but also accelerated energy absorption and transfer, thereby effectively reducing the indent diameter of the front face sheet by 31.99% and its maximum deflection by 10.27%. Compared to the PU with a density of 60 kg/m 3 , the one with a density of 140 kg/m 3 exhibited a better enhancement in its impact resistance. Both the increase in impact energy and the enlargement of the punch radius highlighted the advantages of the SHP in enhancing the impact resistance. Highlights The manufacturing process of SHP was described. The impact response on SHP was studied experimentally and numerically. SHP enhanced the impact resistance and accelerated energy transfer. The peak load of SHP was theoretically predicted. The increase in impact energy and punch radius highlighted the advantages of SHP.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Polymer composites and self-healing · Polymer Foaming and Composites
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track (Central South University) Ministry of Education Changsha China
Joint International Research Laboratory of Key Technology for Rail Traffic Safety Changsha China
National & Local Joint Engineering Research Center of Safety Technology for Rail Vehicle Changsha China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (50)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11122310.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111223 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11443910.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114439 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.10668310.1016/j.ijmecsci.2021.106683 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1519698210.3390/ma15196982 ↗
5. 10.1088/2631-6331/ac8d7a10.1088/2631-6331/ac8d7a ↗
6. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.10557710.1016/j.mtcomm.2023.105577 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2474710.1002/pc.24747 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2641310.1002/pc.26413 ↗
9. 10.1002/pc.2727410.1002/pc.27274 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2835210.1002/pc.28352 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2894110.1002/pc.28941 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2912610.1002/pc.29126 ↗
13. 10.1007/s40799-022-00579-010.1007/s40799-022-00579-0 ↗
14. 10.1177/0021998324129277510.1177/00219983241292775 ↗
15. 10.1002/pat.592310.1002/pat.5923 ↗
16. Damage resistance of honeycomb Sandwich composites under low‐energy impact
17. 10.1177/1099636223120874510.1177/10996362231208745 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.10503410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2024.105034 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10814910.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108149 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11609210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116092 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11482710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114827 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.13910.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.139 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11181410.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111814 ↗
24. 10.1177/109963621772842110.1177/1099636217728421 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.03610.1016/j.compositesb.2011.08.036 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10888110.1016/j.compositesb.2021.108881 ↗
27. 10.1177/073168441452446510.1177/0731684414524465 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2845010.1002/pc.28450 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10443-023-10181-110.1007/s10443-023-10181-1 ↗
30. 10.3390/met1212216310.3390/met12122163 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10718810.1016/j.tws.2020.107188 ↗
32. Experimental investigation on the crashworthy performance of polyurethane foam‐filled aluminum cans under repeated impact loads
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11291010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112910 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.msea.2020.13950010.1016/j.msea.2020.139500 ↗
35. 10.1007/s11595-014-0957-910.1007/s11595-014-0957-9 ↗
36. 10.1002/adem.20170007610.1002/adem.201700076 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11810410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118104 ↗
38. 10.1080/15376494.2023.226346310.1080/15376494.2023.2263463 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.10300210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2021.103002 ↗
40. 10.1007/s11665-020-05181-210.1007/s11665-020-05181-2 ↗
41. 10.1080/13588265.2018.142623310.1080/13588265.2018.1426233 ↗
42. 10.1007/s13726-020-00833-510.1007/s13726-020-00833-5 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11736510.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117365 ↗
44. 10.1017/aer.2023.8510.1017/aer.2023.85 ↗
45. JohnsonGR.A constitutive model and data for metals subjected to large strains high strain rates and high temperatures. Proceedings of the 7th International Symposium on Ballistics The Hague Netherlands.1983.
46. 10.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.12010.1016/j.matpr.2017.12.120 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.00710.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.007 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11178310.1016/j.tws.2024.111783 ↗
49. 10.1016/S0266-3538(00)00023-310.1016/S0266-3538(00)00023-3 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.tust.2016.02.00110.1016/j.tust.2016.02.001 ↗