Microscopic‐to‐macroscopic finite element analysis for predicting polymer‐graphene nanocomposite laminate mechanical strength
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Graphene fillers significantly enhance the mechanical properties of polymer composites. While experimental analysis remains crucial, computational approaches such as finite element analysis (FEA) provide an efficient alternative for characterizing these enhancements. In this work, we developed a multiscale framework where composite properties were obtained by microscale modeling using representative volume elements (RVE) in FEA validated by experimental results, which were then used as the input for macroscopic multi‐layered laminate structures under pure and open‐hole tensile tests. The effects of filler orientation and filler loading on composite laminate mechanical strength were investigated. Our results reveal that orthotropic laminates exhibit superior mechanical performance compared to quasi‐isotropic laminates and those with randomly oriented fillers. The in‐plane filler alignment in orthotropic laminates provides more effective reinforcement, leading to on average 28.40% lower maximum failure index (FI) values than quasi‐isotropic laminates. Additionally, laminates with uniform filler loading outperform those with variable filler distributions, as stress is more evenly distributed, reducing the maximum FI on average by 44.71% and 19.62% in orthotropic and quasi‐isotropic laminates, respectively. Furthermore, the choice of polymer matrix affects composite performance as well. Polycarbonate, with its higher modulus, enhances graphene reinforcement more effectively than high‐density polyethylene. These findings highlight the importance of filler alignment, filler loading distribution, and matrix selection in optimizing the mechanical properties of polymer‐graphene composite laminates and provide design insights for experimental explorations. Highlights Developed a microscopic FEA model validated by experimental results. Utilized a multiscale FEA approach linking the microscale RVE to the macroscale model. Achieved design guide for polymer‐graphene nanocomposite laminate structures.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Tribology and Wear Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
School of Polymer Science and Engineering The University of Southern Mississippi Hattiesburg Mississippi USA
References (79)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1515/epoly‐2022‐008010.1515/epoly‐2022‐0080 ↗
2. 10.1080/15376494.2023.224031910.1080/15376494.2023.2240319 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10777510.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107775 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.10961710.1016/j.mtcomm.2024.109617 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11027010.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110270 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.02610.1016/j.matpr.2023.10.026 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e3966110.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e39661 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.geits.2022.10004310.1016/j.geits.2022.100043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.12210.1016/j.jmrt.2021.12.122 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.59210.1016/j.matpr.2021.12.592 ↗
11. 10.1002/cjce.2486810.1002/cjce.24868 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.flatc.2024.10079710.1016/j.flatc.2024.100797 ↗
13. 10.3390/polym1421473310.3390/polym14214733 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2690510.1002/pc.26905 ↗
15. Hadja Imane B · 2023 · Ch. 2
16. 10.3934/matersci.202303810.3934/matersci.2023038 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.10383110.1016/j.ijengsci.2023.103831 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.jma.2024.12.00110.1016/j.jma.2024.12.001 ↗
19. 10.3390/polym1424556610.3390/polym14245566 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.00510.1016/j.ijnaoe.2016.09.005 ↗
21. Investigate the mechanical strength of laminated composite carbon fiber with different fiber orientations by numerically using finite element analysis
22. 10.1515/cls‐2022‐018610.1515/cls‐2022‐0186 ↗
23. 10.1149/2162‐8777/ad537a10.1149/2162‐8777/ad537a ↗
24. 10.3390/c901002910.3390/c9010029 ↗
25. 10.1021/acsapm.1c0132810.1021/acsapm.1c01328 ↗
26. 10.1038/s41467‐024‐46502‐610.1038/s41467‐024‐46502‐6 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11485410.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114854 ↗
28. Kurowski PM · 2022
29. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.06210.1016/j.jmapro.2022.03.062 ↗
30. PanF WangY HuY HuangC.Application of finite element analysis software ABAQUS in civil engineering course teaching.2022 3rd International Conference on Education Knowledge and Information Management (ICEKIM) 21–23 Jan.2022; 355–358. doi:10.1109/ICEKIM55072.2022.0008610.1109/ICEKIM55072.2022.00086 ↗
31. 10.3390/polym1421449010.3390/polym14214490 ↗
32. 10.12068/j.issn.1005‐3026.2022.03.01310.12068/j.issn.1005‐3026.2022.03.013 ↗
33. 10.1007/s42823‐023‐00543‐x10.1007/s42823‐023‐00543‐x ↗
34. 10.1007/s00707‐023‐03782‐110.1007/s00707‐023‐03782‐1 ↗
35. 10.1177/0040517522111883810.1177/00405175221118838 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.engstruct.2022.11459410.1016/j.engstruct.2022.114594 ↗
37. 10.1007/s40430‐022‐03711‐810.1007/s40430‐022‐03711‐8 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1621299510.3390/polym16212995 ↗
39. 10.3390/aerospace1111093610.3390/aerospace11110936 ↗
40. DigimatFE.Hexagon: South Korea 2023.4. (accessed February 20 2024).
41. Mróz Z · 2003 · 1
42. 10.1088/2515‐7639/ab52d810.1088/2515‐7639/ab52d8 ↗
43. xGnP® Graphene Nanoplatelets – Grade R.http://www.pgstars.com/upload/file/201907/1562198925484430.pdf(accessed 2024 February 19)
44. 10.1002/app.5329210.1002/app.53292 ↗
45. 10.3390/polym1409184210.3390/polym14091842 ↗
46. 10.1080/25740881.2024.235214810.1080/25740881.2024.2352148 ↗
47. 10.1038/s44296‐024‐00006‐y10.1038/s44296‐024‐00006‐y ↗
48. Laminated Plastics High Density Polyethylene.https://laminatedplastics.com/hdpe.pdf(accessed 2024 February 17)
49. Professional Plastics Lexan® Polycarbonate Unfilled Machine Grade Extruded.https://www.professionalplastics.com/professionalplastics/MachineGradePolycarbonateDataSheet.pdf(accessed 2024 February 17)
50. KaragözG.Generalized Hooke's law.2009.
51. 10.1016/B978-081551551-7.50004-810.1016/B978-081551551-7.50004-8 ↗
52. 10.1177/0021998323115510.1177/00219983231155 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10711910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107119 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.surfin.2023.10292210.1016/j.surfin.2023.102922 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.07.00510.1016/j.mechrescom.2013.07.005 ↗
56. 10.1002/pen.1100710.1002/pen.11007 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2021.10894310.1016/j.compscitech.2021.108943 ↗
58. HuntsmanC.Araldite LY 564/Aradur 2954 Technical Datasheet.2011https://www.chemcenters.com/images/Araldite.LY564.Aradur.2954.pdf
59. 10.1016/j.cis.2014.12.00510.1016/j.cis.2014.12.005 ↗
60. Patran: Finite element modeling and analysis software.https://www.mscsoftware.com/product/patran
61. What is Equivalent Stress?https://www.ansys.com/it-it/blog/what-is-equivalent-stress(accessed 2024 February 28)
62. Innovative Portal; Hexgon: South Korea.2021(accessed February 20 2024).
63. 10.1080/09243046.2017.140560710.1080/09243046.2017.1405607 ↗
64. 10.1177/089270571141702810.1177/0892705711417028 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.dental.2007.11.00710.1016/j.dental.2007.11.007 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.12.035 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.05410.1016/j.powtec.2020.02.054 ↗
68. 10.1007/s10854‐010‐0082‐210.1007/s10854‐010‐0082‐2 ↗
69. 2.1. Structural Fundamentals.2024https://www.mm.bme.hu/~gyebro/files/ans_help_v182/ans_thry/thy_str1.html#strucstressstrain(accessed 2024 April 25)
70. 10.1002/mame.20160026010.1002/mame.201600260 ↗
71. 10.3390/app1101018510.3390/app11010185 ↗
72. 10.1088/2515-7639/aaff7a10.1088/2515-7639/aaff7a ↗
73. Nettles AT · 1994
74. Daniel IM · 2006
75. 10.1007/s12206‐023‐0930‐710.1007/s12206‐023‐0930‐7 ↗
76. 10.1080/09243046.2016.122668810.1080/09243046.2016.1226688 ↗
77. 10.1007/978-981-16-9439-4_110.1007/978-981-16-9439-4_1 ↗
78. 10.1016/0734‐743X(96)89050‐610.1016/0734‐743X(96)89050‐6 ↗
79. 10.1016/S0924‐0136(00)00411‐810.1016/S0924‐0136(00)00411‐8 ↗