journal article·2025-12-10Open access

Effects of Recycling on the Elevated Temperature Bending and Creep Response of Regenerated Glass Fiber Reinforced Epoxy Composites

Rohith Gandi, Somanatha Parida, Kishore Kumar Mahato, Madhab Bera, Subrata Mukherjee, Rajesh Kumar Prusty, Bankim Chandra Ray

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 17

Abstract

ABSTRACT The surging global demand for Glass Fiber Reinforced Polymer (GFRP) composites across various sectors has led to significant waste generation, necessitating efficient and sustainable recycling techniques. Though several studies have reported the mechanical performance of either recycled glass fibers or regenerated glass fiber epoxy composites (RGFECs) at ambient temperature, their mechanical behavior under elevated temperatures remains insufficiently investigated. This study evaluates the flexural and creep behavior of RGFECs across different temperatures. The recycled glass fiber (RGFs) fabrics were obtained after 6 cycles, each cycle consisting of an optimized 7.5 min microwave irradiation phase and cooling phase, in a peracetic acid medium. As anticipated, the flexural strength of virgin glass fiber epoxy composites (VGFECs) is higher than that of RGFECs by 13%, 10%, and 28% at 50°C, 70°C, and 100°C, respectively. Further, creep testing revealed a higher temperature sensitivity of RGFEC composites in comparison to VGFEC. When the testing temperature was increased from 50°C to 70°C, the instantaneous creep strain of VGFEC and RGFEC increased by ~11% and ~23%, respectively. Further increase from 70°C to 100°C showed a negligible effect on VGFEC, whereas for RGFEC, it was increased by ~44%. The steady‐state strain rate of RGFEC is higher than that of VGFEC by ~280% and ~305% at 50°C and 70°C, respectively. Topography and fractography were conducted to study the RGFs' surface morphology and flexural failure modes at elevated temperatures. This study underscores the necessity for further optimization of recycling techniques to produce durable RGFECs in thermally demanding applications.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

FRP Composite Laboratory, Department of Metallurgical and Materials Engineering National Institute of Technology Rourkela Odisha India

Department of Manufacturing Engineering, School of Mechanical Engineering Vellore Institute of Technology Vellore Tamil Nadu India

Advanced Materials and Characterization Research Group, Research and Development, Tata Steel Ltd. Jamshedpur Jharkhand India

Funding

Tata Steel · National Institute of Technology Rourkela

References (26)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.00110.1016/j.compositesa.2017.01.001 ↗
2. “E‐Glass Fiber Composites in Transportation Market Report: Trends Forecast and Competitive Analysis to 2030 ”accessed February 24 2025 https://www.lucintel.com/e‐glass‐fiber‐composites‐in‐transportation‐market.aspx.
3. “E‐Glass Fiber Composites in Construction Market Report: Trends Forecast and Competitive Analysis to 2030 ”accessed February 24 2025 https://www.lucintel.com/e‐glass‐fiber‐composites‐in‐construction‐market.aspx.
4. “E‐Glass Fiber Composites in Aerospace and Defense Market Report: Trends Forecast and Competitive Analysis to 2030 ”accessed February 24 2025 https://www.lucintel.com/e‐glass‐fiber‐composites‐in‐aerospace‐and‐defense‐market.aspx.
5. “E‐Glass Fiber Composites in Marine Market Report: Trends Forecast and Competitive Analysis to 2030 ”accessed February 24 2025 https://www.lucintel.com/e‐glass‐fiber‐composites‐in‐marine‐market.aspx.
6. “Composite Waste: Understanding Regulations and Finding Circular Solutions for a Growing Problem ”accessed March 25 2025 https://www.circularise.com/blogs/composite‐waste‐understanding‐regulations‐and‐finding‐circular‐solutions‐for‐a‐growing‐problem.
7. 10.1016/j.cep.2011.09.00710.1016/j.cep.2011.09.007 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2926110.1002/pc.29261 ↗
9. 10.1080/15583724.2019.167340610.1080/15583724.2019.1673406 ↗
10. 10.1179/14658010222500304710.1179/146580102225003047 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jece.2022.10751010.1016/j.jece.2022.107510 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.05510.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.055 ↗
13. 10.1002/marc.20220053810.1002/marc.202200538 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.polymer.2004.12.03510.1016/j.polymer.2004.12.035 ↗
15. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.7b0145610.1021/acssuschemeng.7b01456 ↗
16. 10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b0601310.1021/acssuschemeng.9b06013 ↗
17. 10.1039/D2GC01678H10.1039/D2GC01678H ↗
18. 10.1016/j.resconrec.2021.10610710.1016/j.resconrec.2021.106107 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2895910.1002/pc.28959 ↗
20. 10.1088/1757‐899X/75/1/01201210.1088/1757‐899X/75/1/012012 ↗
21. “ASTM Compass D7264 ”accessed April 3 2024 https://compass.astm.org/document/?contentCode=ASTM%7CD3039_D3039M‐17%7Cen‐US.
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.03110.1016/j.compositesa.2014.11.031 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.01310.1016/j.polymer.2013.05.013 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11027210.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110272 ↗
25. 10.1002/pc.2750510.1002/pc.27505 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.04810.1016/j.ijmecsci.2018.09.048 ↗