journal article·2025-10-10Open access

Effect of low‐pressure plasma treatment on the adhesive performance of PEEK and co‐polymerized PAEK composites

Jindong Zhang, Chang Li, Gang Liu, Yang Si, Jianyong Yu, Bamber R. K. Blackman

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue S3

Abstract

Abstract The use of high‐performance thermoplastic composites has become an increasing trend in the manufacturing of modern aerospace structures due to their environmental and economic advantages. However, the effects of low‐pressure plasma treatment on their surface properties and adhesive joint performance of poly aryl ether ketone (PAEK) composites have not been fully investigated. This study employed a poly ether ether ketone (PEEK) and a new co‐polymerized PAEK to respectively manufacture carbon fiber reinforced polymer (CFRP) composites. Oxygen plasma was used to activate the CFRP surfaces, and the effect of different plasma treatment parameters on their surface morphology, chemical composition, and wettability was studied. The single lap joint strengths of CF/PEEK‐CF/PEEK and CF/PAEK‐CF/PAEK joints were measured. The effects of plasma treatment on the two thermoplastic composites were compared. The results show that a moderate level of plasma treatment was effective in removing surface contaminations, improving wettability, modifying surface micro‐nanostructure, activating surface chemistry, and thus increasing the joint strength. The PAEK matrix composite usually produced joints with higher strength compared to the PEEK matrix composites. The higher toughness of the PAEK matrix composite enabled it to withstand higher energy plasma treatments without incurring the deleterious effect of fiber exposure on the surface. Highlights A newly co‐polymerized PAEK differs from a PEEK in surface treatment and adhesion. PAEK had a higher toughness than PEEK, and it was more difficult to be eroded by plasma. The present CF/PAEK joints showed higher SLS strengths than CF/PEEK joints. After appropriate treatment, SLS strength of CF/PAEK joints reached 36.6 MPa.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Silicone and Siloxane Chemistry · Polymer Nanocomposite Synthesis and Irradiation

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Center for Advanced Low‐dimension Materials, State Key Laboratory of Advanced Fiber Materials, College of Materials Science and Engineering Donghua University Shanghai People's Republic of China

Innovation Center for Textile Science and Technology Donghua University Shanghai People's Republic of China

Department of Mechanical Engineering, City & Guilds Building, South Kensington Campus Imperial College London London UK

Funding

Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities · Aviation Industry Corporation of China · China Scholarship Council

References (41)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110455 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.03410.1016/j.ijmecsci.2019.02.034 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11422710.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114227 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.00310.1016/j.jmrt.2020.09.003 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11005910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110059 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.10330410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2022.103304 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10359610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103596 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10983310.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109833 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10262010.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102620 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.04110.1016/j.matdes.2018.02.041 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2017.06.007 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11110410.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111104 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10959910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109599 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10972810.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109728 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.00510.1016/j.compscitech.2017.11.005 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2502010.1002/pc.25020 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10825810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108258 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10262610.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102626 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10835810.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108358 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.02.00210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2014.02.002 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.04910.1016/j.jmapro.2023.09.049 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2022.15576810.1016/j.apsusc.2022.155768 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.14810.1016/j.apsusc.2015.09.148 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2023.15861410.1016/j.apsusc.2023.158614 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10810110.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108101 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2024.11139410.1016/j.compositesb.2024.111394 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.07310.1016/j.surfcoat.2012.06.073 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10355210.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103552 ↗
29. 10.1007/s10443-020-09854-y10.1007/s10443-020-09854-y ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11056910.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110569 ↗
31. 10.1007/s10973-018-7292-x10.1007/s10973-018-7292-x ↗
32. 10.1002/mame.20220066810.1002/mame.202200668 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.10261410.1016/j.ijadhadh.2020.102614 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11020010.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110200 ↗
35. 10.1002/pi.514110.1002/pi.5141 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.05810.1016/j.jcis.2016.02.058 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.07210.1016/j.jcis.2012.12.072 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.25510.1016/j.apsusc.2017.03.255 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2023.11050010.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2023.110500 ↗
40. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00188‐310.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00188‐3 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10912710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109127 ↗