Influence of resin curing during mold filling on process‐induced residual stresses and deformations in ultra‐thick vacuum‐infused laminates: A multiphysics approach
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract In this study, the impact of resin curing during the mold‐filling, flushing, and bleeding stages of the vacuum infusion (VI) process on the process‐induced residual stresses and deformations in ultra‐thick composite laminates is numerically investigated. For this purpose, a two‐dimensional code namely VIsim has been developed, which can simulate non‐isothermal mold filling using reactive fluid, flushing, bleeding, curing, and evolution of residual stress in the laminate. The VIsim code employs a synergistic approach by integrating finite element/control volume (FE/CV) and streamline‐upwind‐Petrov‐Galerkin (SUPG) methods to address the simulation challenges effectively. Moreover, VIsim has been validated by simulating three experimental test cases previously investigated in the literature. Among the various applications of ultra‐thick laminates, one notable use is in the root sections of wind turbine blades. The study is focused on analyzing a flat E‐glass/epoxy laminate with a thickness of 100 mm and a length of 1 m. The results demonstrate that considering resin curing during the first three stages (mold filling, flushing, and bleeding) of the VI process significantly influences the laminate deformation type and has a notable impact on the magnitudes and distributions of longitudinal and interlaminar normal residual stresses in ultra‐thick laminates. Highlights Resin curing during mold filling influences process‐induced residual stresses. Considering resin curing in mold filling may alter the laminate's deformation type. The VIsim code has been developed and validated to simulate the VI process. VIsim integrates FE/CV and SUPG methods to address the simulation challenges.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Injection Molding Process and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Aerospace Engineering Department Sharif University of Technology Tehran Iran
Funding
Iran National Science Foundation
References (48)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2019.04.024 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.06410.1016/j.compositesb.2016.10.064 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2664810.1002/pc.26648 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.02110.1016/j.compositesa.2004.10.021 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10636810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106368 ↗
6. 10.1177/00219983920260050210.1177/002199839202600502 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2764810.1002/pc.27648 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.01610.1016/j.compositesb.2016.01.016 ↗
9. 10.1177/002199831664875810.1177/0021998316648758 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11168610.1016/j.matdes.2023.111686 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10610510.1016/j.compositesa.2020.106105 ↗
12. 10.1177/073168441769167310.1177/0731684417691673 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.07410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.06.074 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2005.06.010 ↗
15. 10.1007/s00170-021-07765-110.1007/s00170-021-07765-1 ↗
16. RobinsonMJ.Simulation of the vacuum assisted resin transfer molding (VARTM) process and the development of light‐weight composite bridging. UC San Diego.2008.
17. 10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00004-X10.1016/S0009-2509(00)00004-X ↗
18. 10.1177/002199832090863110.1177/0021998320908631 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.01910.1016/j.compositesa.2005.03.019 ↗
20. Advani SG · 1994
21. 10.1016/S0266-3538(03)00161-110.1016/S0266-3538(03)00161-1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.00310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2009.12.003 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.04.01310.1016/j.ijheatmasstransfer.2013.04.013 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.75015020510.1002/pc.750150205 ↗
25. 10.1515/SECM.2007.14.2.11310.1515/SECM.2007.14.2.113 ↗
26. Dessenberger CLTaRB · 1994
27. 10.1177/073168441668421110.1177/0731684416684211 ↗
28. 10.1177/0021998323118164010.1177/00219983231181640 ↗
29. 10.1007/BF0029833010.1007/BF00298330 ↗
30. 10.1002/pc.2385610.1002/pc.23856 ↗
31. 10.1520/CTR10143J10.1520/CTR10143J ↗
32. 10.1177/a03732310.1177/a037323 ↗
33. 10.1016/0266-3538(95)00026-710.1016/0266-3538(95)00026-7 ↗
34. Pepper DW · 1999
35. Huebner KH · 2001
36. Herakovich CT · 1997
37. 10.1201/978143988257310.1201/9781439882573 ↗
38. Song X · 2003
39. 10.1515/polyeng-1986-010410.1515/polyeng-1986-0104 ↗
40. KoorevaarA.Simulation of liquid injection molding: Delivering on the promise.2002.
41. 10.1016/S0266-3538(02)00020-910.1016/S0266-3538(02)00020-9 ↗
42. 10.1002/pc.75011061310.1002/pc.750110613 ↗
43. RobinsonM KosmatkaJ.Vacuum Assisted Resin Transfer Molding Simulation for Thick Laminate Structures in49th AIAA/ASME/ASCE/AHS/ASC Structures Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference 16th AIAA/ASME/AHS Adaptive Structures Conference 10th AIAA Non‐Deterministic Approaches Conference 9th AIAA Gossamer Spacecraft Forum 4th AIAA Multidisciplinary Design Optimization Specialists Conference.
44. 10.1002/nme.8510.1002/nme.85 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10648010.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106480 ↗
46. 10.1016/S0045-7825(99)00040-710.1016/S0045-7825(99)00040-7 ↗
47. 10.1080/1075941970894588910.1080/10759419708945889 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.02010.1016/j.compositesb.2012.10.020 ↗