journal article·2025-07-10Open access

Thermoplastic‐based composites from treated Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merrill. fibers: A bibliometric analysis and literature review on dynamic mechanical analysis

Pui San Khoo, Muhammad Asyraf Muhammad Rizal, Abu Hassan Nordin, Waqas Ashraf, Kamaruddin Zatil Hazrati, Seng Hua Lee, Mazlan Rafidah

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 10

Abstract

Abstract The decline in petroleum resources has motivated researchers to explore Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merrill. or sugar palm fiber (SPF), a promising lignocellulosic fiber from Southeast Asia, particularly Malaysia, in biocomposite applications. SPF primarily comprises cellulose, which provides excellent mechanical properties for domestic products, including brushes, ropes, twine, roofs, and brooms. Numerous studies have investigated SPF‐reinforced thermosetting and thermoplastic composites' thermal, physical, and mechanical properties, investigating factors such as stacking sequence, chemical treatment, fiber size, loading, and orientation. However, a comprehensive review of the dynamic mechanical performance of Arenga pinnata (Wurmb.) Merrill. composites are still lacking. As a result, this review provides a comprehensive bibliometric analysis coupled with a literature review focused on thermoplastic‐based composites utilizing SPFs. This study systematically evaluates the evolution of research in this domain by analyzing publication trends, citation networks, and key contributors over the past two decades. Furthermore, the review highlights critical advancements in the treatment methods of SPFs, their incorporation into thermoplastic matrices, and the subsequent effects on dynamic mechanical properties, specifically focusing on storage modulus, loss modulus, and damping behavior. This review aims to expand current knowledge on the dynamic mechanical behavior of SPF‐reinforced thermoplastic biocomposites for engineering applications. Highlights SPF is a promising fiber from Southeast Asia, particularly Malaysia. SPF primarily consists of cellulose, which exhibits excellent mechanical properties. DMA is the preferred method to reveal details about heterogeneous biocomposite systems. Optimal SPF is effective in restricting molecular chain mobility to improve DMA performance. Hybrid SPF with other fibers in sequence improves biocomposites' DMA performance.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Advanced Cellulose Research Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Advanced Composite Materials (CACM) Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Johor Bahru Malaysia

Engineering Design Research Group (EDRG), Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Johor Bahru Malaysia

Faculty of Applied Sciences Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Arau Malaysia

Department of Textile Engineering National Textile University Faisalabad Pakistan

German Malaysian Institute Jalan Ilmiah, Taman Universiti Kajang Malaysia

Department of Wood Industry, Faculty of Applied Sciences Universiti Teknologi MARA (UiTM) Bandar Tun Razak Malaysia

Faculty of Civil Engineering Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Johor Bahru Malaysia

Funding

Ministry of Higher Education, Malaysia

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2022.11609910.1016/j.indcrop.2022.116099 ↗
2. 10.1007/s10570‐024‐05921‐w10.1007/s10570‐024‐05921‐w ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ssaho.2024.10120810.1016/j.ssaho.2024.101208 ↗
4. 10.36923/jicc.v24i4.91610.36923/jicc.v24i4.916 ↗
5. 10.15376/biores.12.4.9366‐938210.15376/biores.12.4.9366‐9382 ↗
6. 10.35940/ijrte.b1100.0782s41910.35940/ijrte.b1100.0782s419 ↗
7. 10.3390/app1105206110.3390/app11052061 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2841410.1002/pc.28414 ↗
9. Physical properties of hybrid sugar palm yarn fibre/woven glass fibre reinforced unsaturated polyester composites
10. Tensile and flexural properties of compression molded composites of epoxy reinforced with treated sugar palm fibre
11. 10.1080/0360255050037403810.1080/03602550500374038 ↗
12. 10.1080/0360255080205945110.1080/03602550802059451 ↗
13. 10.1021/ie030873c10.1021/ie030873c ↗
14. 10.1016/j.rser.2017.05.09410.1016/j.rser.2017.05.094 ↗
15. 10.1088/1755‐1315/715/1/01201610.1088/1755‐1315/715/1/012016 ↗
16. 10.1088/1755‐1315/305/1/01201610.1088/1755‐1315/305/1/012016 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.34110.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.341 ↗
18. 10.1016/B978‐0‐08‐102292‐4.00003‐510.1016/B978‐0‐08‐102292‐4.00003‐5 ↗
19. 10.17576/jkukm‐2024‐36(5)‐2510.17576/jkukm‐2024‐36(5)‐25 ↗
20. 10.1016/b978‐0‐08‐100037‐3.00012‐210.1016/b978‐0‐08‐100037‐3.00012‐2 ↗
21. 10.1007/s12221‐024‐00776‐110.1007/s12221‐024‐00776‐1 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.00810.1016/j.compositesb.2009.04.008 ↗
23. A review: Fibres, polymer matrices and composites
24. 10.15282/jmes.14.4.2020.04.057810.15282/jmes.14.4.2020.04.0578 ↗
25. 10.1002/app.2936710.1002/app.29367 ↗
26. 10.1002/app.1004310.1002/app.10043 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.12097810.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120978 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.07510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2015.12.075 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1316271010.3390/polym13162710 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.rser.2015.10.03710.1016/j.rser.2015.10.037 ↗
31. Mechanochemical reactions in Lignocellulosic materials: a review
32. Effect of varying fibre loadings on the impact performance of Kenaf and coir reinforced bioepoxy composites
33. 10.1177/0892705724129648310.1177/08927057241296483 ↗
34. 10.1155/2020/887830010.1155/2020/8878300 ↗
35. 10.1007/s12221‐023‐00034‐w10.1007/s12221‐023‐00034‐w ↗
36. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.695.15510.4028/www.scientific.net/amm.695.155 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.04010.1016/j.jmrt.2021.05.040 ↗
38. 10.3390/polym1308134110.3390/polym13081341 ↗
39. 10.1007/s12221‐019‐1061‐810.1007/s12221‐019‐1061‐8 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.07910.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.01.079 ↗
41. 10.3390/polym1321362010.3390/polym13213620 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.00910.1016/j.compstruct.2018.05.009 ↗
43. 10.1002/pc.2558710.1002/pc.25587 ↗
44. An overview of mechanical performance of arrowroot Starchbased biopolymer composites
45. 10.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.00110.1016/j.tourman.2010.07.001 ↗
46. 10.1007/s11356-020-07933-y10.1007/s11356-020-07933-y ↗
47. 10.1007/978‐981‐19‐3342‐4_1010.1007/978‐981‐19‐3342‐4_10 ↗
48. 10.1007/s10973‐011‐1785‐110.1007/s10973‐011‐1785‐1 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.00210.1016/j.carbpol.2018.09.002 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.01110.1016/j.jmrt.2019.04.011 ↗
51. 10.15376/biores.12.4.8734‐875410.15376/biores.12.4.8734‐8754 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.04810.1016/j.matdes.2013.01.048 ↗
53. 10.1002/pc.2537910.1002/pc.25379 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.04510.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.03.045 ↗
55. 10.1111/j.1095‐8339.1984.tb01561.x10.1111/j.1095‐8339.1984.tb01561.x ↗
56. 10.1080/01435698.1983.975275710.1080/01435698.1983.9752757 ↗
57. 10.1007/BF0014023610.1007/BF00140236 ↗
58. The versatile sugar palm
59. 10.1177/20412479120030020310.1177/204124791200300203 ↗
60. JonasL.The sugar palm arenga pinnata as a key factor in ecosystem conservation and regeneration.20121–14.
61. 10.15376/biores.6.4.4815-482310.15376/biores.6.4.4815-4823 ↗
62. 10.1007/s10570‐022‐04695‐310.1007/s10570‐022‐04695‐3 ↗
63. 10.15376/biores.13.4.7430‐744410.15376/biores.13.4.7430‐7444 ↗
64. 10.1016/B978‐0‐08‐102160‐6.00011‐110.1016/B978‐0‐08‐102160‐6.00011‐1 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.05610.1016/j.jmrt.2023.04.056 ↗
66. 10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐819661‐8.00007‐X10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐819661‐8.00007‐X ↗
67. 10.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.14210.1016/j.proeng.2017.04.142 ↗
68. 10.1166/jbmb.2013.126710.1166/jbmb.2013.1267 ↗
69. 10.15376/biores.13.1.1174‐118810.15376/biores.13.1.1174‐1188 ↗
70. 10.1007/s12221‐012‐0894‐110.1007/s12221‐012‐0894‐1 ↗
71. 10.1007/s11837‐018‐2869‐110.1007/s11837‐018‐2869‐1 ↗
72. 10.3390/polym1317296110.3390/polym13172961 ↗
73. 10.15376/biores.13.3.6238‐624910.15376/biores.13.3.6238‐6249 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.proche.2012.06.01510.1016/j.proche.2012.06.015 ↗
75. 10.1016/B978‐0‐12‐819661‐8.00004‐410.1016/B978‐0‐12‐819661‐8.00004‐4 ↗
76. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.00810.1016/j.compscitech.2008.01.008 ↗
77. 10.1515/hf‐2016‐005010.1515/hf‐2016‐0050 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.07210.1016/j.biortech.2013.12.072 ↗
79. 10.1007/s40684‐015‐0024‐910.1007/s40684‐015‐0024‐9 ↗
80. 10.1080/15440478.2012.73351710.1080/15440478.2012.733517 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.07310.1016/j.carbpol.2012.07.073 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.11212210.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112122 ↗
83. 10.1080/0360255090328298610.1080/03602550903282986 ↗
84. 10.3390/molecules2605137110.3390/molecules26051371 ↗
85. 10.3390/ma1321502610.3390/ma13215026 ↗
86. 10.1007/s10570‐016‐0944‐810.1007/s10570‐016‐0944‐8 ↗
87. 10.15376/biores.11.4.10756‐1078210.15376/biores.11.4.10756‐10782 ↗
88. 10.1088/2053‐1591/ab382c10.1088/2053‐1591/ab382c ↗
89. 10.1080/2374068X.2020.175511410.1080/2374068X.2020.1755114 ↗
90. 10.3390/polym1203071610.3390/polym12030716 ↗
91. SiakengR JawaidM AriffinH SapuanSM.Mechanical dynamic and thermomechanical properties of coir / pineapple leaf fiber reinforced Polylactic acid hybrid biocomposites.2018;1‐12. doi:10.1002/pc.2497810.1002/pc.24978 ↗
92. 10.1016/B978‐0‐08‐100959‐8.00006‐810.1016/B978‐0‐08‐100959‐8.00006‐8 ↗
93. 10.15376/biores.12.1.1447-146210.15376/biores.12.1.1447-1462 ↗
94. 10.1002/pc.2009510.1002/pc.20095 ↗
95. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.09910.1016/j.jmrt.2020.01.099 ↗
96. 10.1007/s00289‐023‐05115‐710.1007/s00289‐023‐05115‐7 ↗
97. 10.1007/s12588‐010‐0010‐610.1007/s12588‐010‐0010‐6 ↗
98. 10.1021/acsomega.7b0012210.1021/acsomega.7b00122 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.06810.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.068 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.05110.1016/j.carbpol.2016.03.051 ↗