Synergistic effect of magnetic particles and secondary carbon‐based filling materials on the properties of natural rubber/butadiene rubber magnetorheological elastomers
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This article investigates the impact of magnetic particle content and various secondary carbon‐based filling materials on the mechanical properties, microstructure, magnetism, and viscoelasticity of magnetorheological elastomers (MREs) derived from natural rubber (NR) and butadiene rubber (BR). MREs composites with different formulations were prepared by using NR/BR blend (abbreviated as NB) as matrix and introducing carbonyl iron powder (CIP), few‐layer graphene (FLG), and carbon nanotube (CNT) as reinforcing fillers. The compressive mechanical properties, magnetorheological effect (MR Effect) and stress relaxation behavior of MREs under magnetic field were analyzed through microstructure characterization and macroscopic properties testing. The experimental results show that compared with the samples added CIP, FLG, and CNT, NB‐60CIP‐FLG has the best performance, which significantly improves the tensile mechanical properties, the stress of 300% set elongation is increased by 336.3%, the compressive properties are significantly increased by 92.7%. The performance of the NB‐60CIP‐CNT is also excellent, its 300% set elongation stress increased by 323.4%, in addition, its compression performance significantly improved by 79.2%. After the addition of the magnetic field, MR effect and magnetic response performance of the NB‐60CIP‐CNT sample were improved by 75.2% and 6.3%, while the MR effect and magnetic response performance of the NB‐60CIP‐FLG sample were improved by 49.9% and 18.8% compared with NB‐60CIP. In addition, the damping performance of secondary carbon‐based filling materials on MREs is also improved. This article discusses the influence of CIP content, filler type, and magnetic field intensity on the performance of MREs, highlighting its considerable importance for practical applications in production. Highlights MREs composites were prepared by using NR/BR blend as matrix. Carbonyl iron powder and graphene were used as reinforcing fillers. The carbon‐based fillers has improved the mechanical properties of MREs. The magnetic field has a significant effect on the performance of MREs.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Vibration Control and Rheological Fluids · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties · Structural Engineering and Vibration Analysis
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Key Laboratory of automobile Materials, Ministry of Education, and College of Materials Science and Engineering Jilin University Changchun Jilin China
College of Chemistry Jilin University Changchun China
Department of Endodontics, Jilin Provincial Key Laboratory of Tooth Development and Bone Remodeling, School and Hospital of Stomatology Jilin University Changchun Jilin China
School of Mechanical and Aerospace Engineering Jilin University Changchun China
References (34)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11012510.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110125 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10914810.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109148 ↗
3. 10.1007/s11831-023-10031-010.1007/s11831-023-10031-0 ↗
4. Role of additives in enhancing the rheological properties of magnetorheological solids: a review
5. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.04210.1016/j.compositesb.2015.11.042 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2020.10863710.1016/j.compscitech.2020.108637 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.coco.2021.10065710.1016/j.coco.2021.100657 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.01510.1016/j.jiec.2019.01.015 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.06.02510.1016/j.mechmachtheory.2019.06.025 ↗
10. 10.1088/1361-665X/abb57510.1088/1361-665X/abb575 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.02710.1016/j.ymssp.2017.07.027 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2021.10784310.1016/j.ymssp.2021.107843 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ymssp.2022.10963310.1016/j.ymssp.2022.109633 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.01610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2017.01.016 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.tws.2020.10676510.1016/j.tws.2020.106765 ↗
16. 10.1039/C7NR09129J10.1039/C7NR09129J ↗
17. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.10581610.1016/j.ijmecsci.2020.105816 ↗
18. 10.1002/pc.2746410.1002/pc.27464 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.triboint.2023.10865810.1016/j.triboint.2023.108658 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.10883010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2023.108830 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10834810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108348 ↗
22. 10.1177/089270571987822210.1177/0892705719878222 ↗
23. 10.1088/1361-665X/abbc7710.1088/1361-665X/abbc77 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.07510.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.075 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.00310.1016/j.polymertesting.2007.12.003 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.10623310.1016/j.polymertesting.2019.106233 ↗
27. 10.1007/s00397-022-01329-010.1007/s00397-022-01329-0 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.10676410.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.106764 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10966910.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109669 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.coco.2022.10116910.1016/j.coco.2022.101169 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.02710.1016/j.jmmm.2019.03.027 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.rinp.2019.02.04510.1016/j.rinp.2019.02.045 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.jmmm.2020.16710610.1016/j.jmmm.2020.167106 ↗
34. 10.1002/pc.2813110.1002/pc.28131 ↗