Effect of impact position on the mechanical response and viscoelastic behavior of double‐blade composite stiffened structures
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract This paper focuses on the mechanical response and viscoelastic properties of double‐blade composite stiffened structure (DCSS) under low‐velocity impact (LVI). Firstly, the impact resistance and viscoelastic behavior of the DCSS are revealed by LVI testing at four different locations using the same initial velocity. Next, the damage morphologies at the impact locations are observed with ultrasonic A‐ and C‐scan equipment and optical microscopy. At last, the DCSS containing impact damage is implemented for axial compression and the strain values of the DCSS surface are obtained using a strain testing system to reveal its residual properties and buckling behavior. The results show that there are significant differences in the impact damage modes at the four different locations. The maximum impact resistance is observed at location D, while location A has the opposite. The DCSS has a certain viscoelastic behavior at LVI and conforms to an exponential decay model. Moreover, position B presents interface debonding damage due to stiffness discontinuities at the flange and skin bonding and severely weakens the load carrying performance of the DCSS. Highlights The impact resistance of different positions is analyzed by LVI experimental results. Viscoelastic properties exist at different impact locations and obey the exponential decay model. Impact damage alters the buckling load and residual strength of the DCSS. The damage mechanism of the triangular zone is revealed by damage morphology.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Composite Structure Analysis and Optimization · Metal Forming Simulation Techniques
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
National Key Laboratory of Science and Technology on Advanced Composites in Special Environments Harbin Institute of Technology Harbin PR China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China
References (47)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/pc.2847010.1002/pc.28470 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.03810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.06.038 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.ast.2021.10685810.1016/j.ast.2021.106858 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.10973310.1016/j.engfracmech.2023.109733 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.10893810.1016/j.tws.2022.108938 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11633910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116339 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.ast.2024.10893010.1016/j.ast.2024.108930 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2016.11.043 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.ast.2023.10865010.1016/j.ast.2023.108650 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10641810.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106418 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.ast.2018.11.03810.1016/j.ast.2018.11.038 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10658810.1016/j.tws.2019.106588 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.04310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.12.043 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.01110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.01.011 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.01710.1016/j.compositesb.2013.09.017 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.02510.1016/j.compscitech.2008.10.025 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.05310.1016/j.compstruct.2017.06.053 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.04610.1016/j.ijfatigue.2017.03.046 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.00410.1016/j.paerosci.2015.11.004 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10699110.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.106991 ↗
21. Prediction of viscoelastic behaviour of polymer matrix composites based on polymer matrix
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2017.12.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.09410.1016/j.compstruct.2017.08.094 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.03810.1016/j.matdes.2016.03.038 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.00410.1016/j.compositesb.2012.04.004 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.12610.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.126 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.05410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.08.054 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.tws.2022.11029510.1016/j.tws.2022.110295 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.00410.1016/j.compstruct.2016.12.004 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.07910.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.079 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2019.10623110.1016/j.tws.2019.106231 ↗
32. 10.1177/002199831771578510.1177/0021998317715785 ↗
33. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.01210.1016/j.compstruct.2016.08.012 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11333310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113333 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2018.08.080 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10793110.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107931 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.00810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.008 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11089610.1016/j.tws.2023.110896 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2017.02.025 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.01910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.08.019 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.09.00410.1016/j.ijimpeng.2017.09.004 ↗
42. 10.1163/15685510777975531810.1163/156855107779755318 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.01010.1016/j.compositesa.2016.04.010 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.00710.1016/j.compstruct.2004.09.007 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.03310.1016/j.compstruct.2006.06.033 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.21710.1016/j.proeng.2013.08.217 ↗
47. El‐Hofy M · 2017 · 535