journal article·2026-05-10Open access

Effect of Consolidation Time in Hot Press Compression Molding of Continuous Carbon Fiber‐Reinforced Polyetheretherketone Composite

Adrian Korycki, Fabrice Carassus, Christian Garnier, France Chabert, Toufik Djilali

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT Processing long fiber reinforced thermoplastic composites such as polyaryletherketones with carbon fibers (CF/PEEK) has found interest in the aerospace industry due to short‐time manufacturing and possible recyclability. Limiting defects during their manufacturing remains challenging. Obtaining low void content and high degree of crystallinity to obtain the desired mechanical properties requires careful control of the process parameters. In this work, hot press compression was performed to evaluate the effect of consolidation time on the CF/PEEK composite properties. For the purpose of comparison, vacuum‐bag‐only (VBO) was also carried out. The highest interlaminar shear strength (ILSS) is obtained by hot press at 87 MPa, 20% higher than with VBO. Moreover, the void content is equally low for laminates consolidated for 5 min at 390°C and 30 min at 400°C by hot press and VBO, respectively. Using VBO, the crystallinity is 40% lower than for the composites obtained by hot pressing. Thus, consolidation by hot press for only 5 min at 390°C allows saving production time and reaching higher mechanical properties than with VBO. These results constitute a meaningful guideline to choose the process parameters to target constant quality of thermoplastic composites for high‐demanding applications in aerospace parts.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Fiber-reinforced polymer composites · Engineering and Materials Science Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

LGP‐ENIT‐UTTOP Tarbes France

LAUAK France, Innovation Service Tarbes France

POTEZ, Research and Development Service Aire‐sur‐l'Adour France

Funding

Agence Nationale de la Recherche

References (56)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1179/146580109X1254099504580410.1179/146580109X12540995045804 ↗
2. 10.3390/polym1405096510.3390/polym14050965 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.75008020210.1002/pc.750080202 ↗
4. 10.3390/ma1324583210.3390/ma13245832 ↗
5. 10.1016/S0924‐0136(03)00450‐310.1016/S0924‐0136(03)00450‐3 ↗
6. 10.1016/S0034‐3617(14)70178‐X10.1016/S0034‐3617(14)70178‐X ↗
7. 10.1016/S0034‐3617(11)70073‐X10.1016/S0034‐3617(11)70073‐X ↗
8. Baker A. A. · 2004
9. 10.3390/ma1518636510.3390/ma15186365 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.00910.1016/j.compositesa.2013.09.009 ↗
11. 10.1179/174328911X1298862280109810.1179/174328911X12988622801098 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.00310.1016/j.compositesa.2014.10.003 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10403610.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104036 ↗
14. 10.3390/jcs404014910.3390/jcs4040149 ↗
15. 10.3390/polym1312195110.3390/polym13121951 ↗
16. 10.1016/0043‐1648(96)80012‐310.1016/0043‐1648(96)80012‐3 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.00510.1016/j.matdes.2006.11.005 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.09710.1016/j.cirp.2007.05.097 ↗
19. Polyetheretherketone PEEK
20. 10.1177/00219983920260160310.1177/002199839202601603 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.03510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.035 ↗
22. 10.1002/app.1990.07040091710.1002/app.1990.070400917 ↗
23. 10.1016/0040-6031(89)85174-310.1016/0040-6031(89)85174-3 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.02410.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2010.01.024 ↗
25. 10.1002/polb.1992.09030050510.1002/polb.1992.090300505 ↗
26. 10.25518/esaform21.198510.25518/esaform21.1985 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.08.00310.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2015.08.003 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00009‐910.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00009‐9 ↗
29. 10.1177/00219983870210110410.1177/002199838702101104 ↗
30. 10.1002/pen.2178510.1002/pen.21785 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.03410.1016/j.compositesa.2018.06.034 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.00410.1016/j.ijplas.2016.08.004 ↗
33. 10.1021/ma300524710.1021/ma3005247 ↗
34. Zhang D. · 2017
35. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.07010.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.070 ↗
36. 10.1177/073168442092408110.1177/0731684420924081 ↗
37. 10.1002/pc.2784710.1002/pc.27847 ↗
38. 10.1002/pc.75011020710.1002/pc.750110207 ↗
39. Saffar F. · 2019
40. 10.1007/s12541‐018‐0004‐410.1007/s12541‐018‐0004‐4 ↗
41. 10.1007/s10973‐018‐7292‐x10.1007/s10973‐018‐7292‐x ↗
42. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10440910.1016/j.surfin.2024.104409 ↗
43. 10.1106/LNR5-QDA0-QKKC-K16R10.1106/LNR5-QDA0-QKKC-K16R ↗
44. 10.1002/app.5140210.1002/app.51402 ↗
45. Korycki A. · 2020
46. 10.1002/app.1040610.1002/app.10406 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.jajp.2024.10025210.1016/j.jajp.2024.100252 ↗
48. 10.5028/jatm.2010.0202631010.5028/jatm.2010.02026310 ↗
49. 10.1016/0032-3861(91)90111-U10.1016/0032-3861(91)90111-U ↗
50. Ferrara J. A. · 1995
51. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10687810.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106878 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.01310.1016/j.ijadhadh.2018.11.013 ↗
53. L.Martineau F.Chabert G.Bernhart andT.Djilali Mechanical Behavior of Amorphous PEEK in The Rubbery State. In:ECCM17—17th European Conference on Composite Materials(2016) accessed October 30 2023 https://hal.science/hal‐01515536.
54. 10.2320/matertrans.44.161310.2320/matertrans.44.1613 ↗
55. 10.1155/2016/545070810.1155/2016/5450708 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.11009610.1016/j.polymdegradstab.2022.110096 ↗