journal article·2026-05-10

Research Progress on Fiber Reinforced Polymer/Metal Hybrid Structures for Automotive Applications

Dengfeng Wang, Hao Sun, Wenchao Xu, Jialin Dong, Fengmin Lian, Hongshuai Huo

Polymer Composites· Volume 47· Issue 9
Publisher page

Abstract

ABSTRACT Achieving the carbon peaking and carbon neutrality goals represents a critical technological imperative for the automotive industry, with lightweighting emerging as a pivotal pathway. Fiber‐reinforced polymer (FRP)/metal hybrid structures synergistically combine the low density, high specific strength/stiffness, tunable properties, exceptional design flexibility, and versatile manufacturability of FRP composites with stable strength, the ductility, cost‐effectiveness, and mature processing technologies of metallic materials. The synergistic integration enables automotive components to achieve optimized performance, weight reduction, and enhanced cost‐effectiveness. This paper systematically reviews global research advancements in FRP/metal hybrid structures for automotive. It comprehensively examines experimental methodologies for characterizing mechanical properties, constitutive modeling approaches for constituent materials, multi‐scale analysis techniques, and failure mechanisms. Special emphasis is placed on interfacial bonding, with detailed analysis of how physical, chemical, and integrated surface treatments influence interfacial bonding performance. The discussion extends to multi‐objective, multidisciplinary optimization methodologies that target the enhancement of structural strength, stiffness, and energy absorption by strategically controlling interface performance, connection processes, and design parameters. Practical automotive applications of FRP/metal hybrid structures are subsequently demonstrated. Finally, the study synthesizes current research trends and proposes future development directions, providing the foundation for advancing FRP/metal hybrid structures research and industrial implementation.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Engineering and Materials Science Studies · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

National Key Laboratory of Automotive Chassis Integration and Bionics Jilin University Changchun China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China · National Key Research and Development Program of China

References (100+)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.matdes.2022.11099410.1016/j.matdes.2022.110994 ↗
2. Fouts R. · 2021
3. 10.1177/136943321773970910.1177/1369433217739709 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.10096210.1016/j.addma.2019.100962 ↗
5. 10.1080/14484846.2022.212547210.1080/14484846.2022.2125472 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.00510.1016/j.compositesa.2018.12.005 ↗
7. 10.1177/0954008322111475210.1177/09540083221114752 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11621310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116213 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.04.01510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2013.04.015 ↗
10. 10.1007/s42114‐021‐00393‐z10.1007/s42114‐021‐00393‐z ↗
11. 10.1007/s00170‐024‐13400‐610.1007/s00170‐024‐13400‐6 ↗
12. 10.1088/2631‐8695/ad3c1010.1088/2631‐8695/ad3c10 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.10830410.1016/j.ijfatigue.2024.108304 ↗
14. Shetty S. K. · 2006
15. 10.1002/pc.2868810.1002/pc.28688 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.02310.1016/j.engfracmech.2007.02.023 ↗
17. 10.19537/j.cnki.2096‐2789.2023.22.03910.19537/j.cnki.2096‐2789.2023.22.039 ↗
18. Discussion on Mechanical Properties of Metallic Materials Under Extremely High Strain Rate
19. L.ScanoandF.Piccini “Impact of General and Local Metal Loss on the API 579–1 Creep Residual Life ”InASME Pressure Vessels and Piping Conference (PVP)2022 Las Vegas NV.10.1115/PVP2022-84642 ↗
20. 10.1007/s11223‐024‐00675‐z10.1007/s11223‐024‐00675‐z ↗
21. 10.3390/pr806072410.3390/pr8060724 ↗
22. 10.1080/25740881.2023.225291910.1080/25740881.2023.2252919 ↗
23. 10.3934/matersci.202403810.3934/matersci.2024038 ↗
24. Test Method for CAE Simulation Material Parameters of Continuous Fiber Reinforced Polymer Matrix Composites
25. 10.3390/ma1418518310.3390/ma14185183 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13179010.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.131790 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10795810.1016/j.compositesb.2020.107958 ↗
28. 10.1515/ntrev‐2021‐010410.1515/ntrev‐2021‐0104 ↗
29. 10.3390/polym1409173410.3390/polym14091734 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11060810.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110608 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.11023810.1016/j.engfracmech.2024.110238 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.08610.1016/j.compstruct.2018.02.086 ↗
33. 10.1007/s00707‐004‐0168‐010.1007/s00707‐004‐0168‐0 ↗
34. Ucan M. · 2013
35. 10.1007/s00419‐021‐02030‐z10.1007/s00419‐021‐02030‐z ↗
36. 10.1007/s40430‐022‐03741‐210.1007/s40430‐022‐03741‐2 ↗
37. 10.1038/s41598‐021‐88333‐110.1038/s41598‐021‐88333‐1 ↗
38. 10.3390/ma1604157410.3390/ma16041574 ↗
39. 10.1007/3-211-38102-3_110.1007/3-211-38102-3_1 ↗
40. 10.1063/5.003427810.1063/5.0034278 ↗
41. 10.1108/rpj‐11‐2018‐028310.1108/rpj‐11‐2018‐0283 ↗
42. 10.1061/jccof2.Cceng‐436410.1061/jccof2.Cceng‐4364 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11830510.1016/j.compstruct.2024.118305 ↗
44. 10.1061/(asce)cc.1943‐5614.000052610.1061/(asce)cc.1943‐5614.0000526 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.13253110.1016/j.conbuildmat.2023.132531 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.11.01010.1016/j.ijsolstr.2019.11.010 ↗
47. Singh V. · 2020
48. 10.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.00810.1016/j.cemconcomp.2015.07.008 ↗
49. 10.1177/002199831879392810.1177/0021998318793928 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2022.10963710.1016/j.compscitech.2022.109637 ↗
51. 10.1177/146134841881102210.1177/1461348418811022 ↗
52. R.Wongpajan S.Mathurosemontri J.Boonlertsamut et al. “Interfacial Properties of Injection Molded Glass Fiber/Thermoplastics Composites ”14(Proceedings of the asme international mechanical engineering congress and exposition 2016):V014T07A010.10.1115/IMECE2016-66722 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.03510.1016/j.compstruct.2018.11.035 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11659310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116593 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.03910.1016/j.istruc.2021.12.039 ↗
56. 10.1177/0967391122110874310.1177/09673911221108743 ↗
57. 10.1002/pc.2686710.1002/pc.26867 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11781310.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117813 ↗
59. 10.1163/156856111x59369410.1163/156856111x593694 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11077310.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110773 ↗
61. 10.1002/pc.2856410.1002/pc.28564 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.surfin.2024.10493410.1016/j.surfin.2024.104934 ↗
63. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.02.02610.1016/j.engfracmech.2017.02.026 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11527710.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115277 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11008710.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110087 ↗
66. 10.1002/pc.2842310.1002/pc.28423 ↗
67. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10429110.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104291 ↗
68. 10.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.04210.1016/j.promfg.2018.07.042 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.ijplas.2018.08.01310.1016/j.ijplas.2018.08.013 ↗
70. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2023.10417710.1016/j.tafmec.2023.104177 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10821710.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108217 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.coco.2024.10203410.1016/j.coco.2024.102034 ↗
73. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.04010.1016/j.jmrt.2024.05.040 ↗
74. 10.3390/app1307442910.3390/app13074429 ↗
75. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.01310.1016/j.compositesb.2014.12.013 ↗
76. 10.1177/0021998324123248710.1177/00219983241232487 ↗
77. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.03110.1016/j.engfracmech.2019.03.031 ↗
78. 10.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.10758010.1016/j.ijmecsci.2022.107580 ↗
79. 10.1002/pc.2842610.1002/pc.28426 ↗
80. 10.1177/0967391122111966910.1177/09673911221119669 ↗
81. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.01510.1016/j.ijimpeng.2018.08.015 ↗
82. 10.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.12356510.1016/j.conbuildmat.2021.123565 ↗
83. 10.12693/APhysPolA.129.63910.12693/APhysPolA.129.639 ↗
84. 10.1002/pen.2624410.1002/pen.26244 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.03910.1016/j.jmatprotec.2018.08.039 ↗
86. T.Gebken M.Kuehn M.Demes et al. “Integral Manufacturing of Plastic‐Metal Hybrids Consisting of Endless Fiber Reinforcement Using Injection Molding ”8(Materials Today‐Proceedings 2019):804–811 https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.022.10.1016/j.matpr.2019.02.022 ↗
87. 10.1016/j.matlet.2022.13365110.1016/j.matlet.2022.133651 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.00310.1016/j.optlastec.2018.02.003 ↗
89. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.07210.1016/j.jmapro.2023.07.072 ↗
90. 10.3390/polym1402028810.3390/polym14020288 ↗
91. 10.2351/7.000085310.2351/7.0000853 ↗
92. 10.1088/1757-899X/373/1/01201510.1088/1757-899X/373/1/012015 ↗
93. 10.1080/00218464.2021.200837010.1080/00218464.2021.2008370 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.tafmec.2024.10477810.1016/j.tafmec.2024.104778 ↗
95. 10.3390/met1102026510.3390/met11020265 ↗
96. 10.1007/s00170‐023‐11200‐y10.1007/s00170‐023‐11200‐y ↗
97. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.10946010.1016/j.engfailanal.2025.109460 ↗
98. 10.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.10347810.1016/j.ijadhadh.2023.103478 ↗
99. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.24610.1016/j.apsusc.2019.06.246 ↗
100. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.04410.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.044 ↗