journal article·2025-04-10Open access

Tribologically enhanced self‐healing hybrid laminates for wind turbine applications

Kemal Hasirci, Berkay Ergene, Alaeddin Burak Irez

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 5

Abstract

Abstract Wind turbines are subjected to extreme weather and load conditions; hence, high strength and impact resistance are required. Furthermore, wind turbine blades can be subjected to impact loads such as bird strikes, resulting in the formation of microcracks. Self‐healing capsules can be used to mend turbine blades for microscale damage. The incorporation of self‐healing capsules may cause a decrease in the mechanical characteristics of the composites prior to impact resistance, which can be compensated for with efficient fillers such as silicon carbide whiskers (SiCw). Thus, a novel hybrid composite structure is examined with the advantage of using a self‐healing mechanism and SiCw reinforcement. Tensile, tribological, and Charpy impact tests were performed to characterize the mechanical and tribological properties, which were supported with microscopic observations. Multiple experimental characterizations were performed to investigate the impact, and the ultimate tensile strength (UTS) and energy absorption capacity of the structure were shown to increase by 32% and 45%, respectively, with the addition of SiCw. The presence of self‐healing agents provides a 5% rise in UTS after enough time for healing following the collision. The structure's tribological performance is improved by 10% in wear resistance and 20% in friction coefficient. Highlights Hybrid laminated composite structure with silicon carbide whisker and self‐healing capsules. Tensile and Charpy impact tests conducted with microscopic observations Increased ultimate tensile strength and energy absorption capacity by 32% and 45%. Tribological improvement by 10% in wear resistance and 20% in friction coefficient.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Mechanical stress and fatigue analysis

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Mechanical Engineering Istanbul Technical University (ITU) Istanbul Türkiye

Department of Mechanical Engineering, Faculty of Technology Pamukkale University Denizli Türkiye

Department of Biomedical Engineering Carnegie Mellon University Pittsburgh Pennsylvania USA

Funding

Bilimsel Araştırma Projeleri Birimi, İstanbul Teknik Üniversitesi

References (84)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.74510.1016/J.MATPR.2021.02.745 ↗
2. 10.1002/PC.2884610.1002/PC.28846 ↗
3. 10.1177/0021998323122098610.1177/00219983231220986 ↗
4. 10.1002/PC.2800610.1002/PC.28006 ↗
5. 10.7234/KSCM.2009.22.1.02210.7234/KSCM.2009.22.1.022 ↗
6. 10.3390/en1417524110.3390/en14175241 ↗
7. 10.1007/978-1-4419-9308-3_510.1007/978-1-4419-9308-3_5 ↗
8. NanamiN StrganacT SchneiderW PolycarpouAA.Structural and damage assessment of multi‐section modular hybrid composite wind turbine blade.2014https://oaktrust.library.tamu.edu/handle/1969.1/153418
9. 10.5923/J.JMEA.20160605.0410.5923/J.JMEA.20160605.04 ↗
10. Bird impact analysis of a composite wind turbine blade
11. 10.1016/J.RSER.2023.11326110.1016/J.RSER.2023.113261 ↗
12. 10.1080/13588265.2020.179455510.1080/13588265.2020.1794555 ↗
13. National Research Council · 2007
14. 10.1038/447126A10.1038/447126A ↗
15. 10.1016/J.RENENE.2012.01.07410.1016/J.RENENE.2012.01.074 ↗
16. Dolbeer RichardA WrightSE.Wildlife strikes to civil aircraft in the United States 1990–2007.1990.
17. 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.11300510.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2020.113005 ↗
18. 10.2514/1.4394310.2514/1.43943 ↗
19. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2023.10745610.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2023.107456 ↗
20. 10.3390/MA1301012910.3390/MA13010129 ↗
21. KaraM TatarAC KırıcıM KepirY GunozA AvcıA.Effects of extreme low temperatures on the impact behavior of boron nitride nanofillers added carbon fiber/epoxy composite tubes.2022;56(30):4635‐4644. doi:10.1177/0021998322113627810.1177/00219983221136278 ↗
22. 10.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_9510.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_95 ↗
23. 10.1002/PC.2865910.1002/PC.28659 ↗
24. 10.1002/PC.2885310.1002/PC.28853 ↗
25. 10.1002/PC.2865010.1002/PC.28650 ↗
26. 10.1002/PC.2869310.1002/PC.28693 ↗
27. 10.1002/PC.2677710.1002/PC.26777 ↗
28. 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2007.11.00410.1016/J.COMPSTRUC.2007.11.004 ↗
29. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2006.06.00810.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2006.06.008 ↗
30. 10.1007/978‐3‐031‐50478‐5_410.1007/978‐3‐031‐50478‐5_4 ↗
31. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2023.10753910.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2023.107539 ↗
32. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2022.10709610.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2022.107096 ↗
33. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2020.10601610.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2020.106016 ↗
34. 10.31127/TUJE.86695510.31127/TUJE.866955 ↗
35. 10.1098/RSIF.2006.020910.1098/RSIF.2006.0209 ↗
36. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(03)00138‐610.1016/S1359‐835X(03)00138‐6 ↗
37. 10.1115/MSEC2011‐5020410.1115/MSEC2011‐50204 ↗
38. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2024.10812110.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2024.108121 ↗
39. 10.1002/PC.2883810.1002/PC.28838 ↗
40. 10.1002/PC.2870710.1002/PC.28707 ↗
41. 10.24874/ti.1448.02.23.0410.24874/ti.1448.02.23.04 ↗
42. 10.1590/1980‐5373‐MR‐2022‐040610.1590/1980‐5373‐MR‐2022‐0406 ↗
43. 10.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_2510.1007/978-981-19-0244-4_25 ↗
44. 10.1111/J.1551‐2916.2004.01525.X10.1111/J.1551‐2916.2004.01525.X ↗
45. 10.1111/J.1551‐2916.2004.01436.X10.1111/J.1551‐2916.2004.01436.X ↗
46. 10.1007/BF00352770/METRICS10.1007/BF00352770/METRICS ↗
47. 10.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.11610010.1016/J.COMPSTRUCT.2022.116100 ↗
48. 10.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2008.01.00210.1016/J.JEURCERAMSOC.2008.01.002 ↗
49. 10.1111/J.1151‐2916.2000.TB01249.X10.1111/J.1151‐2916.2000.TB01249.X ↗
50. 10.1016/J.CERAMINT.2017.10.22010.1016/J.CERAMINT.2017.10.220 ↗
51. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.10709610.1016/J.COMPOSITESB.2019.107096 ↗
52. 10.1007/S10443‐020‐09844‐0/TABLES/410.1007/S10443‐020‐09844‐0/TABLES/4 ↗
53. 10.12693/APhysPolA.132.87910.12693/APhysPolA.132.879 ↗
54. 10.1007/978-94-009-1129-1_310.1007/978-94-009-1129-1_3 ↗
55. 10.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.04010.1016/j.polymer.2008.12.040 ↗
56. ASTM International.Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials 1.201410.1520/D3039_D3039M‐1
57. Systemes D · 2008
58. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2007.01.01710.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2007.01.017 ↗
59. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2005.12.01310.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2005.12.013 ↗
60. IannucciL DonadonMV.Bird strike modeling using a new woven glass failure model.4:18‐41.https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267788157
61. 10.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2004.08.00610.1016/J.IJIMPENG.2004.08.006 ↗
62. 10.1177/096369351802700501/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_096369351802700501‐FIG8.JPEG10.1177/096369351802700501/ASSET/IMAGES/LARGE/10.1177_096369351802700501‐FIG8.JPEG ↗
63. 10.1016/J.MATPR.2019.09.05110.1016/J.MATPR.2019.09.051 ↗
64. ASTM International.D6110 standard test method for determining the Charpy impact resistance of notched specimens of plastics.2018https://www.astm.org/d6110-18.html
65. DoelandW.EASA CM‐S‐001‐compliance with CS‐25 bird strike requirements.2012https://www.easa.europa.eu/en/document-library/product-certification-consultations/easa-cm-s-001
66. 10.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2007.07.02810.1016/J.JMATPROTEC.2007.07.028 ↗
67. Effect of silicon carbide fillers on the mechanical properties of glass fibre reinforced epoxy polymer composite
68. 10.4236/OJCM.2022.12100210.4236/OJCM.2022.121002 ↗
69. 10.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2008.05.02310.1016/J.COMPSCITECH.2008.05.023 ↗
70. 10.3390/POLYM1308132310.3390/POLYM13081323 ↗
71. A review on the effect of delamination on the performance of composite plate
72. 10.1016/S0266‐3538(01)00048‐310.1016/S0266‐3538(01)00048‐3 ↗
73. 10.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2020.10586210.1016/J.COMPOSITESA.2020.105862 ↗
74. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.07210.1016/j.compstruct.2019.01.072 ↗
75. 10.1002/PC.2726810.1002/PC.27268 ↗
76. 10.1007/978‐3‐030‐86741‐6_410.1007/978‐3‐030‐86741‐6_4 ↗
77. 10.1177/0892705724123048110.1177/08927057241230481 ↗
78. ASTM International.ASTM G99‐17‐standard test method for wear testing with a pin‐on‐disk apparatus.2023https://webstore.ansi.org/standards/astm/astmg9917
79. SiC p/glass fibers reinforced epoxy composites: wear and erosion behavior
80. Irez AB · 2018 · 45
81. 10.4314/IJEST.V6I5.510.4314/IJEST.V6I5.5 ↗
82. 10.1016/J.WEAR.2006.12.08110.1016/J.WEAR.2006.12.081 ↗
83. Power AC.Decommissioned wind turbine blade management strategies. American Clean Power Association.2023https://etipwind.eu/files/reports/
84. BoltmanS.Offshore wind: opportunities for the composites industry.2011.