Investigation of the effects of hybridization types and temperature on the quasi‐static indentation properties of glass/flax hybrid composites for various test speeds
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Hybridizing man‐made fiber composites with natural fibers has been chosen for numerous structural or semi‐structural applications over the last several decades. Even though several studies have been conducted to determine the mechanical properties of inter‐ply hybrid composites, the effects of hybridization on the out‐of‐plane mechanical properties of hybrid composites still need to be clarified. The mechanical properties of hybrid composites at low temperatures are another significant matter to be elucidated. In this study, E‐glass and flax yarns were used to produce woven fabrics to obtain intra‐ and inter‐ply hybrid composites. They were then subjected to the quasi‐static indentation test at −30°C, 25°C, and 60°C. It was concluded that, according to the hybridization type, an improvement or decrease can be obtained in the mechanical properties of hybrid composites. The contact force and energy absorption properties of pure glass composite could be increased at 8.88% and 3.87% proportions respectively, thanks to the intra‐ply hybrid composite‐1 in the study. Furthermore, the through‐thickness properties and damage mechanisms of hybrid composites were profoundly affected by the temperature.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Textile materials and evaluations · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Textile Engineering Dokuz Eylül University Izmir Turkey
Department of Mechanical Engineering Dokuz Eylül University Izmir Turkey
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. Composites manufacturing magazine. Accessed December 2022.https://compositesmanufacturingmagazine.com/2022/02/84417/6/
2. 10.1111/ijag.1226110.1111/ijag.12261 ↗
3. 10.1111/ijag.1205310.1111/ijag.12053 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.13410.1016/j.apsusc.2017.11.134 ↗
5. 10.1177/0021998322110625010.1177/00219983221106250 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.matlet.2014.02.03010.1016/j.matlet.2014.02.030 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.jobe.2016.12.00310.1016/j.jobe.2016.12.003 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2122410.1002/pc.21224 ↗
9. 10.1080/15440478.2020.186329610.1080/15440478.2020.1863296 ↗
10. 10.1007/s12046-017-0676-y10.1007/s12046-017-0676-y ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714910.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107149 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10675910.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106759 ↗
13. 10.1177/073168441143112310.1177/0731684411431123 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.03010.1016/j.compscitech.2018.12.030 ↗
15. 10.1177/002199831142988410.1177/0021998311429884 ↗
16. 10.1002/pc.2598910.1002/pc.25989 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.00110.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.06.001 ↗
18. 10.1080/15440478.2021.195841710.1080/15440478.2021.1958417 ↗
19. Hybrid composites and intra‐ply hybrid composites based on jute and glass fibers: a comparative study on moisture absorption and mechanical properties
20. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10697610.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106976 ↗
21. 10.12989/scs.2016.22.4.77710.12989/scs.2016.22.4.777 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.10694210.1016/j.polymertesting.2020.106942 ↗
23. 10.1007/s10443-021-09973-010.1007/s10443-021-09973-0 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2322410.1002/pc.23224 ↗
25. Zulkafli N · 2019 · 6
26. 10.1016/j.crgsc.2022.10028410.1016/j.crgsc.2022.100284 ↗
27. 10.1002/pc.2469110.1002/pc.24691 ↗
28. 10.1177/147592171877059610.1177/1475921718770596 ↗
29. 10.3390/molecules2510232510.3390/molecules25102325 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.01410.1016/j.polymertesting.2017.05.014 ↗
31. 10.1177/0021998321104929010.1177/00219983211049290 ↗
32. 10.1177/0967391121101693210.1177/09673911211016932 ↗
33. WiseTex homepage. Accessed May 2023.https://www.mtm.kuleuven.be/english/research/scalint/cmg/software/wisetex/
34. 10.1177/109963621771922310.1177/1099636217719223 ↗
35. JusohMSBM AhmadHABI YahyaMYB.Indentation and low velocity impact properties of woven E‐glass hybridization with basalt jute and flax toughened epoxy composites. Paper presented at: 3rd International Conference on Power Generation Systems and Renewable Energy Technologies (PGSRET) 2017 pp. 164–168.10.1109/PGSRET.2017.8251821 ↗
36. Proc Inst Mech Eng, Part C: J Mech
37. 10.1177/152808371664429010.1177/1528083716644290 ↗
38. 10.1177/002199832092850910.1177/0021998320928509 ↗
39. ImageJ Homepage. Accessed December 2022.https://imagej.nih.gov/ij/
40. 10.1177/105678951039707810.1177/1056789510397078 ↗