Investigations on interfacial moisture storage and its relation to the mechanical behavior in polymer composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Moisture absorption in composites significantly influence the fiber/matrix interface regions and mechanical properties. Hence, it is very important to quantify the moisture storage in interfaces and correlate it to the mechanical behavior. The novelty of this article is that, for the first time, it explores the correlation of moisture absorption parameters with the mechanical behavior of composites. The paper studies four different types of moisture‐soaked composites—glass fiber/epoxy, carbon fiber/epoxy, ZnO nanowire incorporated glass fiber/epoxy, and ZnO nanowire incorporated carbon fiber/epoxy. One‐dimensional hindered diffusion model (1D HDM) was used for the extraction of moisture absorption parameters. The hindrance coefficient (ratio of bound to unbound moisture) of composites was found to increase proportionately with the increase in the volume of interfacial regions. Only in carbon fiber/epoxy composite, it did not increase proportionately due to the relatively larger degradation of interface. This was correlated well with mechanical test responses wherein carbon fiber/epoxy exhibited anomalous failure modes due to relatively larger degradation of interface. Numerical simulations were also carried out to describe the moisture absorption in composites. Numerical simulations of moisture absorption in composites using time‐varying boundary conditions matched very well with experimental as well as 1D HDM results.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes · Composite Material Mechanics
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Indian Institute of Information Technology Design and Manufacturing Kancheepuram Chennai India
References (33)
Show source-provided references
1. Summerscales J. · 2014 · 1
2. 10.1002/pc.2546810.1002/pc.25468 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2574510.1002/pc.25745 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2578910.1002/pc.25789 ↗
5. 10.1002/pc.2601510.1002/pc.26015 ↗
6. 10.1007/s10853-012-6947-410.1007/s10853-012-6947-4 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.10769310.1016/j.polymertesting.2022.107693 ↗
8. 10.1002/pc.2704910.1002/pc.27049 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.00310.1016/j.pmatsci.2015.02.003 ↗
10. 10.1002/pc.2575810.1002/pc.25758 ↗
11. 10.1002/pc.2578410.1002/pc.25784 ↗
12. 10.1002/pc.2539710.1002/pc.25397 ↗
13. 10.3390/fib603005910.3390/fib6030059 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2557710.1002/pc.25577 ↗
15. 10.1002/pc.2623610.1002/pc.26236 ↗
16. Wang B. · Sustain. Mar. Struct. · 2019 · 1 · 17
17. K. J.Wong Ph.D. Dissertation University of Burgundy 2013.
18. 10.1177/00219983780120020110.1177/002199837801200201 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.01610.1016/j.compositesa.2012.03.016 ↗
20. 10.1063/1.494232510.1063/1.4942325 ↗
21. 10.1002/pen.2446910.1002/pen.24469 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2020.10590810.1016/j.compositesa.2020.105908 ↗
23. 10.3390/jcs401002110.3390/jcs4010021 ↗
24. 10.1002/pc.2466410.1002/pc.24664 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.04410.1016/j.compstruct.2012.09.044 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.00110.1016/j.compstruct.2013.10.001 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.02610.1016/j.compstruct.2014.05.026 ↗
28. V. B.Mora Master's Thesis Gdansk University of Technology 2016.
29. 10.1002/pc.2667310.1002/pc.26673 ↗
30. ASTM D3171‐15 · 2015
31. ASTM D5229/D5229M‐92 · 2008
32. ASTM D3039/D3039M‐08 · 2008
33. ASTM D5528‐13 · 2013