An inclusive study on hygrothermal aging effects on tribological and physical properties of E‐glass fiber reinforced interpenetrating polymer networks (IPNs) composites
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Nowadays, polymeric composite materials are principally utilized in most structural and wear applications. Considerable amounts of foregoing works have emphasized the performance of polymeric composites subjected to (dry) sliding wear conditions, especially those strengthened with fiber reinforcements and other filler materials. Also, another omission has been witnessed regarding the materials while subjected to hygrothermal environments. In this study, the influence of hygrothermal (accelerated) aging on mechanical and tribological factors has been completely analyzed on the E‐glass reinforced interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) composite laminates. Moreover, to additionally strengthen the IPN laminate, nanoclay filler materials have been infused into the matrix materials, such as 0%, 1%, 3%, 5%, 7%, and 9%. As the IPN matrix material, a blending of 70% epoxy and 30% polyurethane has been chosen. Additionally, in order to thoroughly investigate the physical strength of the IPN laminates during the hygrothermal aging, tests like water absorption, dynamic mechanical analysis, differential scanning calorimetry, tensile test, and wear analysis have been conducted on dry specimens and samples subjected to hygrothermal aging environments by placing the laminates in temperatures of 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C. As a result, it has been found that dry specimens with a nanoclay proportion of 5% dispersion have apparently excelled in all the investigations conducted on the IPN specimens rather than the hygrothermal aging specimens. Also, to understand the microscopic changes in the laminates, scanning electron microscopic investigations were also carried out to explore the possibility of usage of the laminates in marine applications. Highlights Nanoclay dispersion improved the IPN composites' mechanical and thermal stability. Filler levels ranged from 0% to 9% in epoxy‐polyurethane IPN matrices. Tests evaluated dry and aged composites at 50°C, 60°C, and 70°C. Optimal properties are observed in composites with 5% nanoclay filler. SEM analysis revealed enhanced microstructural integrity with nanoclay inclusion.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Tribology and Wear Analysis · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites · Polymer Nanocomposites and Properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Mechanical Engineering Dr. M. G. R. Educational and Research Institute Chennai India
Department of Mechanical Engineering Rajalakshmi Institute of Technology Chennai India
Senior Analyst HCL America INC USA
School of Mechanical Engineering, Department of Manufacturing Engineering VIT Vellore India
Department of Mechatronics Engineering Rajalakshmi Engineering College Chennai India
Department of Mechanical Engineering Panimalar Engineering College Chennai India
References (66)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.giant.2024.10027010.1016/j.giant.2024.100270 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.11210.1016/j.jmrt.2023.01.112 ↗
3. 10.5772/intechopen.11410510.5772/intechopen.114105 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.01510.1016/j.carbon.2022.03.015 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10441310.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.104413 ↗
6. 10.1007/s40964‐024‐00646‐510.1007/s40964‐024‐00646‐5 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.carpta.2024.10052010.1016/j.carpta.2024.100520 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2021.10637110.1016/j.compositesa.2021.106371 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.02510.1016/j.matpr.2020.08.025 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.05810.1016/j.jmrt.2020.06.058 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.03410.1016/j.jmrt.2021.07.034 ↗
12. 10.12693/APhysPolA10.12693/APhysPolA ↗
13. 10.1016/j.rineng.2024.10228110.1016/j.rineng.2024.102281 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2800610.1002/pc.28006 ↗
15. Analyzing the Tribological behavior of titanium dioxide (TiO2) particulate filled jute fiber reinforced interpenetrating polymer network (IPNs) composite by using Taguchi optimization technique
16. Investigation of TiO2 Nano filler in mechanical, thermal behaviour of sisal/jute fiber reinforced interpenetrating polymer network (IPN) composites
17. 10.4028/p‐qx682s10.4028/p‐qx682s ↗
18. 10.1007/s12221‐022‐4194‐010.1007/s12221‐022‐4194‐0 ↗
19. Mechanical, microstructural, and thermal characterization insights of pyrolyzed carbon black from waste tires reinforced epoxy nanocomposites for coating application
20. 10.1002/pc.2506710.1002/pc.25067 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2573210.1002/pc.25732 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2584310.1002/pc.25843 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.02310.1016/j.matdes.2014.02.023 ↗
24. 10.1080/23311916.2022.206907010.1080/23311916.2022.2069070 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.16610.1016/j.matpr.2023.09.166 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.71010.1016/j.matpr.2022.03.710 ↗
27. 10.3390/polym1408162010.3390/polym14081620 ↗
28. 10.1002/pc.2893810.1002/pc.28938 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.16310.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.163 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.27010.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.270 ↗
31. Wear behavior of sansevieria cylindrica and E‐glass reinforced polyester composites
32. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.84510.1016/j.matpr.2020.02.845 ↗
33. 10.3390/polym1305075410.3390/polym13050754 ↗
34. 10.1007/s00289‐021‐03759‐x10.1007/s00289‐021‐03759‐x ↗
35. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.39510.1016/j.matpr.2022.01.395 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.09610.1016/j.matpr.2020.01.096 ↗
37. Effect of nanoclay addition on vibration properties of glass fiber reinforced vinyl ester composites
38. 10.1177/073168440708136810.1177/0731684407081368 ↗
39. Influence of water absorption on glass fibre reinforced IPN composite pipes
40. 10.1515/mt‐2021‐203810.1515/mt‐2021‐2038 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.00810.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.008 ↗
42. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.17810.1016/j.matpr.2023.01.178 ↗
43. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.13977010.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.139770 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.34610.1016/j.matpr.2023.07.346 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10853‐023‐08710‐110.1007/s10853‐023‐08710‐1 ↗
46. 10.1007/s10853‐021‐06378‐z10.1007/s10853‐021‐06378‐z ↗
47. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.05910.1016/j.matpr.2022.12.059 ↗
48. 10.3390/polym1403052610.3390/polym14030526 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.24810.1016/j.matpr.2020.05.248 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.13910.1016/j.matpr.2022.05.139 ↗
51. 10.1002/app.3195810.1002/app.31958 ↗
52. Vibration characteristics of glass fabric/epoxy composites with different woven structures10.1177/0021998310377943 ↗
53. 10.1007/s13399‐023‐03886‐710.1007/s13399‐023‐03886‐7 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.hybadv.2023.10009510.1016/j.hybadv.2023.100095 ↗
55. 10.1177/1464420723118860110.1177/14644207231188601 ↗
56. 10.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.11410.1016/j.jmrt.2020.03.114 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.02810.1016/j.compscitech.2005.05.028 ↗
58. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2018.05.00110.1016/j.aiepr.2018.05.001 ↗
59. 10.1016/j.jmps.2021.10461410.1016/j.jmps.2021.104614 ↗
60. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.03510.1016/j.compositesb.2015.09.035 ↗
61. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.00610.1016/j.compositesb.2014.06.006 ↗
62. 10.1016/S0043-1648(03)00252-710.1016/S0043-1648(03)00252-7 ↗
63. 10.1177/089270571879655410.1177/0892705718796554 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.06710.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.067 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.03210.1016/j.compositesb.2019.02.032 ↗
66. 10.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.10736910.1016/j.polymertesting.2021.107369 ↗