journal article·2025-08-10Open access

Mechanical properties and predictive analysis of multi‐material polypropylene‐glass fiber sandwich structures produced by material extrusion

Julia Utz, Amelie Ferbert, Nico Geis, Holger Ruckdäschel

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 11

Abstract

Abstract Combining multiple filaments in material extrusion (MEX) to tailor mechanical properties is increasingly significant in science and applications. However, understanding the interaction between different materials, the influence on the mechanical properties and the predictability of such properties is still poor. Therefore, this study investigates the tensile and flexural behavior of 3D‐printed sandwich‐type composites made of polypropylene (PP) and glass fiber‐filled polypropylene (PPGF). The materials exhibit different mechanical properties, with PP being more ductile and flexible and PPGF being more brittle and stiff. Various contents of PP and PPGF were used. Measured mechanical values were correlated with theoretical predictions. The tensile properties scaled linearly with the material composition, covering a range of moduli and strength values between 500–2910 MPa and 18–43 MPa, respectively. A rule of mixture could be applied, although PPGF layers tended to crack early. The ductile nature of PP allowed for bridging cracks, preventing premature failure. In flexural tests, the shell material dominated modulus, strength and failure mode. The samples with PPGF shells failed by cracking, while specimens with PP shells showed high deformation without clear failure. By varying contents and layer order, flexural moduli ranging from 680 to 3180 MPa and flexural strengths from 25 to 65 MPa were reached. Additionally, the study demonstrated that theoretical calculations and predictions of tensile and flexural moduli were highly accurate with an average deviation of 6.0% and 1.4%, respectively. This highlights the potential for tailoring mechanical properties based on the characteristics of PP and PPGF. Highlights High PP/PPGF interface adhesion ensures reproducible multi‐material printing. Whole range of mechanical properties from ductile PP to stiff PPGF is reached. Order and amount of both materials determine failure behavior. Analytical prediction of modulus is very accurate.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Cellular and Composite Structures

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Polymer Engineering University of Bayreuth Bayreuth Germany

Neue Materialien Bayreuth GmbH Bayreuth Germany

Funding

Universität Bayreuth

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. InamdarA MaganaM MedinaF GrajedaY WickerR.Development of an automated multiple material stereolithography machine. Paper presented at international solid freeform fabrication symposium.2006.
2. 10.1007/s00170-009-2434-810.1007/s00170-009-2434-8 ↗
3. 10.2351/1.490630310.2351/1.4906303 ↗
4. 10.1038/srep4567110.1038/srep45671 ↗
5. 10.1371/journal.pone.016062410.1371/journal.pone.0160624 ↗
6. 10.1002/advs.20190230710.1002/advs.201902307 ↗
7. 10.1002/adma.20210885510.1002/adma.202108855 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10257710.1016/j.addma.2021.102577 ↗
9. 10.3390/polym1203065110.3390/polym12030651 ↗
10. 10.1007/s00170-020-04937-310.1007/s00170-020-04937-3 ↗
11. 10.1007/s40964-021-00195-110.1007/s40964-021-00195-1 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.matdes.2023.11166110.1016/j.matdes.2023.111661 ↗
13. 10.1007/978-3-031-25106-110.1007/978-3-031-25106-1 ↗
14. Allen HG · 1969
15. Definition and categories of hybrid materials
16. 10.1007/s40964-022-00295-610.1007/s40964-022-00295-6 ↗
17. 10.1002/mame.20230042810.1002/mame.202300428 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.07610.1016/j.promfg.2017.07.076 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.addma.2018.06.02710.1016/j.addma.2018.06.027 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2021.10014510.1016/j.jcomc.2021.100145 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.02910.1016/j.matdes.2018.04.029 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2018.09.008 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.measurement.2020.10858310.1016/j.measurement.2020.108583 ↗
24. 10.1108/RPJ-07-2022-022110.1108/RPJ-07-2022-0221 ↗
25. 10.1108/RPJ-05-2017-010710.1108/RPJ-05-2017-0107 ↗
26. NasirovA HasanovS FidanI.Prediction of mechanical properties of fused deposition modeling made parts using multiscale modeling and classical laminate theory. Paper Presented at 2019 International Solid Freeform Fabrication Symposium.2019.
27. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.10095510.1016/j.mtcomm.2020.100955 ↗
28. 10.3390/ma1206089510.3390/ma12060895 ↗
29. A multiscale modeling approach of the fused filament fabrication process to predict the mechanical response of 3D printed parts
30. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2023.11012510.1016/j.compscitech.2023.110125 ↗
31. 10.1063/5.013665910.1063/5.0136659 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.06510.1016/j.rinp.2018.11.065 ↗
33. BV BDPS.Technical Data Sheet—Ultrafuse PP. Version No. 4.0.2020.
34. BV BDPS.Technical Data Sheet—Ultrafuse PP GF30. Version No. 2.3.2019.
35. Ashby MF · 2016
36. 10.1080/1478644210863626410.1080/14786442108636264 ↗
37. 10.1016/0022-460X(81)90493-410.1016/0022-460X(81)90493-4 ↗
38. 10.1177/109963621982942310.1177/1099636219829423 ↗