Characterization of interlaminar properties across processing parameters of consolidation of CF/PEKK composites for benchmarking performance
Source abstract
Abstract
Abstract Carbon fiber reinforced thermoplastics (CFRTP) are gaining momentum, largely due to the benefits of in situ curing, which eliminates long cure times. This makes them an ideal choice for rapid manufacturing using automated tape‐layup machines. Given the sensitivity of thermoplastic properties to processing parameters, a detailed experimental characterization of interlaminar consolidation capacity is crucial before adoption. In this study, we placed poly‐ether‐ketone‐ketone (PEKK) thermoplastic tapes using a robotic tape‐layup machine and consolidated them via compression molding. The resulting samples were experimentally characterized to obtain the thermo‐mechanical performance as a function of consolidation pressure, duration, and ply‐stack orientation for a total of 15 testing cases. Our findings show that the modulus and strength of the laminates with similar ply‐stack orientation can change significantly by up to 200%, based on different processing parameters. The time for interlaminar chain diffusion emerged as the most influential processing parameter. This work provides a benchmark for properties to be targeted with automated fiber placement techniques and underscores the importance of detailed experimental characterization in adopting such techniques. Highlights Processing parameters can affect the tensile strength of CF/PEKK by up to 200%. Consolidation time is the most influential processing parameter for CF/PEKK. Crystallinity only affects ultimate tensile properties and not stiffness. In‐plane shear is primarily controlled by interlaminar chain diffusion. Outgassing in the interfibrous region can cause significant voids.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Epoxy Resin Curing Processes
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Civil & Environmental Engineering Michigan State University East Lansing Michigan USA
Polymer and Nanocomposite Group, Center for Materials and Manufacturing Eaton Research Laboratory Southfield Michigan USA
Funding
DEVCOM Army Research Laboratory
References (38)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/jcs203004210.3390/jcs2030042 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.aiepr.2021.03.00110.1016/j.aiepr.2021.03.001 ↗
3. Anderson RL · 1991
4. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11098710.1016/j.compstruct.2019.110987 ↗
5. Manufacturing flat and cylindrical laminates and built‐up structure using automated thermoplastic tape laying, fiber placement, and filament winding
6. 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.35510.1016/j.matpr.2019.12.355 ↗
7. 10.1177/089270571666251610.1177/0892705716662516 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.02410.1016/j.compositesa.2012.02.024 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.00810.1016/j.compositesa.2015.08.008 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11422310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114223 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.addma.2021.10245810.1016/j.addma.2021.102458 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10699210.1016/j.compositesa.2022.106992 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.00710.1016/j.compositesa.2011.01.007 ↗
14. 10.1177/09673911100180010110.1177/096739111001800101 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.03510.1016/j.compositesa.2019.03.035 ↗
16. Automated fiber placement defect identity cards: cause, anticipation, existence, significance, and progression
17. 10.1016/j.jcomc.2020.10003610.1016/j.jcomc.2020.100036 ↗
18. AgarwalS.Width Deformation of Thermoplastic Prepreg Tapes during In‐Situ Automated Fiber Placement: an Experimental Investigation into the Width Deformation Mechanism and Influence of Processing Parameters.2023.
19. 10.1177/08927057970100030110.1177/089270579701000301 ↗
20. 10.1002/app.4645610.1002/app.46456 ↗
21. McKeeA MorrisJ AbramsonJ PeyronM LeoT.Characterization of carbon fiber PEKK thermoplastic prepreg for process modeling. Western Cedar (Western Washington University).2023. doi:10.33599/nasampe/s.23.021810.33599/nasampe/s.23.0218 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.03310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.033 ↗
23. 10.1007/s00170‐022‐09795‐910.1007/s00170‐022‐09795‐9 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.02510.1016/j.compositesb.2014.05.025 ↗
25. 10.1002/adv.2017710.1002/adv.20177 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11110410.1016/j.compositesb.2023.111104 ↗
27. Salek MH · 2005
28. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2022.10735910.1016/j.compositesa.2022.107359 ↗
29. Solvay.Solvay APC‐2/AS4 PEEK Plus Carbon Fiber Reinforced Unidirectional Tape 102 017. REV.1.
30. Standard test method for in‐plane shear response of polymer matrix composite materials by tensile test of a ±45° laminate. Standard ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 19428–2959 USA Nov 2018.
31. Standard d Test Method for Tensile Properties of Polymer Matrix Composite Materials. ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 19428‐2959 USA June 4 2014.
32. Standard test method for tensile properties of polymer matrix composite materials. Standard ASTM International West Conshohocken PA 19428–2959 USA Oct 2021.
33. Menczel JD · 2014
34. Perkin_Elmer.DSC as Problem Solving Tool: Measurement of Percent Crystallinity of Thermoplastics 12 000. REV.1.
35. 10.1177/00219983870210110310.1177/002199838702101103 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.06310.1016/j.compstruct.2016.10.063 ↗
37. 10.1002/app.4339610.1002/app.43396 ↗
38. Recent developments in automated fiber placement of thermoplastic composites