journal article·2025-04-20

Flexural and low‐velocity behavior of GFPP / DP980 honeycomb sandwich structure inspired by fiber metal laminates

Yanyan Lin, Chufan Xiao, Huaguan Li, Xiaofan Zhang, Yingzhao Hou, Jie Tao

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract With the rapid development of electric vehicles, a hybrid composite structure has been designed for the battery pack bottom guard to enhance impact resistance and reduce weight. The glass fiber‐reinforced polypropylene (GFPP)/DP980 honeycomb sandwich structure consists of GFPP panels with a polypropylene honeycomb core. DP980 advanced high‐strength steel plate is encapsulated within the structure, inspired by fiber metal laminates. A lightweight and high‐strength sandwich composite lay‐up solution was determined through equivalent bending stiffness theory, finite element simulation and experiment. An asymmetric sandwich structure with the steel plate on the impacted side enhanced flexural strength and ductility, demonstrating different failure sequences and a higher bending strength of 77.64 MPa compared to 50.18 MPa when the steel plate was on the unimpacted side. As impact energy increased from 100 to 200 J, the sandwich structure showed higher peak impact load, deeper craters, and increased bulge height, with significant delamination up to 175 J, while gravel impact tests revealed minimal flexural strength reduction (4.92%) even after repeated impacts. This study confirms that the use of thermoplastic sandwich structures is a viable and promising option for crash safety and the lightweight design of battery pack bottom guards. Highlights The thermoplastic honeycomb sandwich structure is polypropylene‐based. The use of advanced high strength steel is inspired by fiber metal laminates. Both thickness and surface density are considered in the structural design. The steel plate placed on the impacted side improves the flexural behavior. The sandwich structure has excellent impact resistance and lightweight level.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Cellular and Composite Structures · Mechanical Behavior of Composites · Natural Fiber Reinforced Composites

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

School of Materials Science and Engineering Nanjing Institute of Technology Nanjing China

Institute of High Speed Aerodynamics China Aerodynamics Research and Development Center Mianyang China

College of Materials and Technology Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics Nanjing China

Funding

National Natural Science Foundation of China

References (49)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s12239-023-0001-110.1007/s12239-023-0001-1 ↗
2. Scenarios involving accident‐damaged electric vehicles
3. 10.1016/j.energy.2023.13014510.1016/j.energy.2023.130145 ↗
4. 10.1080/13588265.2020.181225310.1080/13588265.2020.1812253 ↗
5. 10.3389/fenrg.2023.111426310.3389/fenrg.2023.1114263 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11445810.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114458 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2024.11045610.1016/j.compscitech.2024.110456 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.10804110.1016/j.engfailanal.2024.108041 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11010210.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110102 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10989910.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109899 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.10834410.1016/j.oceaneng.2020.108344 ↗
12. 10.1007/s10409-023-23113-x10.1007/s10409-023-23113-x ↗
13. 10.1002/pc.2726710.1002/pc.27267 ↗
14. 10.1002/pc.2836810.1002/pc.28368 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11530210.1016/j.compstruct.2022.115302 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11125810.1016/j.tws.2023.111258 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2019.11180610.1016/j.compstruct.2019.111806 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11154110.1016/j.tws.2023.111541 ↗
19. 10.1002/pc.2844910.1002/pc.28449 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11498010.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114980 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2019.10576110.1016/j.compositesa.2019.105761 ↗
22. 10.1002/pc.2845510.1002/pc.28455 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tws.2024.11174410.1016/j.tws.2024.111744 ↗
24. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10936710.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109367 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2024.11792410.1016/j.compstruct.2024.117924 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11350710.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113507 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11285110.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112851 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2023.11081210.1016/j.compositesb.2023.110812 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.03510.1016/j.jmatprotec.2017.01.035 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.10460910.1016/j.ijimpeng.2023.104609 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11057810.1016/j.tws.2023.110578 ↗
32. ASTM C 393/C 393M‐2016.Standard test method for core shear properties of sandwich constructions by beam flexure.
33. ASTM D7136/D7136M‐2015 Standard test method for measuring the damage resistance of a fiber‐reinforced polymer matrix composite to a drop‐weight impact event.
34. SAE J400‐2002.Test for chip resistance of surface coatings.
35. Experimental investigation on the compression‐after‐double‐impact behaviors of GF/epoxy laminates embedded with/without metal wire nets
36. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10902310.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109023 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2023.11776110.1016/j.compstruct.2023.117761 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.09310.1016/j.compositesb.2018.11.093 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.00910.1016/j.compscitech.2012.05.009 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10780210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107802 ↗
41. 10.1007/s12239-021-0112-510.1007/s12239-021-0112-5 ↗
42. 10.1177/1099636222108463710.1177/10996362221084637 ↗
43. 10.3390/polym1324441610.3390/polym13244416 ↗
44. 10.1007/s10443-023-10190-010.1007/s10443-023-10190-0 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.10443010.1016/j.ijimpeng.2022.104430 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.03010.1016/j.compositesb.2017.03.030 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11639910.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116399 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.tws.2023.11154910.1016/j.tws.2023.111549 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.dt.2023.12.00310.1016/j.dt.2023.12.003 ↗