journal article·2025-03-10

Influence of continuous ramie yarn content on printability and mechanical properties of in situ impregnation 3D printed biocomposites

Kui Wang, Yanlu Chang, Ping Cheng, Yanni Rao, Yong Peng, Said Ahzi

Polymer Composites· Volume 46· Issue 4
Publisher page

Abstract

Abstract The present work aimed to study the printability and tensile behaviors of ramie yarn‐reinforced PLA‐based composites fabricated by an in situ impregnated fused filament fabrication (FFF) process. The dimensional error analysis was conducted to evaluate the printability of biocomposites with different processing variations and continuous ramie yarns. The effect of yarn volume fraction (Yf) caused by processing variations and ramie yarn characteristics on the mechanical properties was also studied. The results showed that the dimensional accuracy of the biocomposites with different ramie yarns could be adjusted by process parameter optimization. On the basis of ensuring printability, the Yf was within the range of 6.80% to 23.32% in the current study. With the increase of Yf, the tensile strength and the tensile modulus of the biocomposites significantly increased. When the Yf was 23.32%, the tensile strength and the tensile modulus increased by 60.78% and 382.35%, respectively, compared to pristine PLA. In addition, an analytical model considering the influences of Yf and microstructural characteristics such as interfacial void content (Vp) on the tensile strength of the 3D printed biocomposites was derived, and the theoretical predictions were in good agreement with experimental measurements.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Additive Manufacturing and 3D Printing Technologies · Innovations in Concrete and Construction Materials · Crafts, Textile, and Design

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Key Laboratory of Traffic Safety on Track of Ministry of Education School of Traffic and Transportation Engineering, Central South University Changsha China

ICUBE Laboratory‐CNRS University of Strasbourg Strasbourg France

References (53)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.02410.1016/j.jmapro.2022.11.024 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.susmat.2024.e0091610.1016/j.susmat.2024.e00916 ↗
3. 10.1002/pc.2597810.1002/pc.25978 ↗
4. 10.1002/pc.2626610.1002/pc.26266 ↗
5. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2022.11631310.1016/j.compstruct.2022.116313 ↗
6. 10.1016/j.coco.2023.10159210.1016/j.coco.2023.101592 ↗
7. 10.1002/pc.2806510.1002/pc.28065 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2024.10823110.1016/j.compositesa.2024.108231 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.06510.1016/j.jmapro.2021.12.065 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.06510.1016/j.jmapro.2024.04.065 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11256210.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112562 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.jmapro.2024.03.11210.1016/j.jmapro.2024.03.112 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.10976610.1016/j.compositesb.2022.109766 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11486610.1016/j.compstruct.2021.114866 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.engappai.2023.10648310.1016/j.engappai.2023.106483 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11322310.1016/j.compstruct.2020.113223 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.05110.1016/j.compstruct.2018.03.051 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.01810.1016/j.compstruct.2016.07.018 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2023.10797210.1016/j.compositesa.2023.107972 ↗
20. 10.1002/pc.2761210.1002/pc.27612 ↗
21. 10.1002/pc.2852510.1002/pc.28525 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.addma.2019.05.01910.1016/j.addma.2019.05.019 ↗
23. Comparing performance of 3D‐printed and injection‐molded fiber‐reinforced composite parts in ring‐spinning traveler application
24. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.08010.1016/j.compstruct.2017.10.080 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2022.11045010.1016/j.compositesb.2022.110450 ↗
26. 10.1002/pc.2830210.1002/pc.28302 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.indcrop.2021.11376010.1016/j.indcrop.2021.113760 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2021.10938910.1016/j.compositesb.2021.109389 ↗
29. Properties investigation of 3D printed continuous pineapple leaf fiber‐reinforced PLA composite
30. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2020.10847410.1016/j.compositesb.2020.108474 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.10398510.1016/j.mtcomm.2022.103985 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.matdes.2019.10788410.1016/j.matdes.2019.107884 ↗
33. 10.1002/pc.2681610.1002/pc.26816 ↗
34. 10.1177/073168441880730010.1177/0731684418807300 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.05210.1016/j.compstruct.2017.11.052 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10276310.1016/j.addma.2022.102763 ↗
37. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2020.11261010.1016/j.compstruct.2020.112610 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.05410.1016/j.compositesb.2018.04.054 ↗
39. 10.1038/s41598-019-50832-710.1038/s41598-019-50832-7 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.01410.1016/j.compstruct.2018.09.014 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.compstruct.2021.11503310.1016/j.compstruct.2021.115033 ↗
42. 10.3390/polym1105079910.3390/polym11050799 ↗
43. 10.1038/srep2305810.1038/srep23058 ↗
44. 10.1038/s41598‐020‐68331‐510.1038/s41598‐020‐68331‐5 ↗
45. 10.1016/j.compositesb.2019.10714710.1016/j.compositesb.2019.107147 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.03210.1016/j.compositesa.2016.05.032 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.03710.1016/j.engfracmech.2016.03.037 ↗
48. 10.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.15910.1016/j.proeng.2016.12.159 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.mechmat.2020.10365310.1016/j.mechmat.2020.103653 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.01610.1016/j.compscitech.2009.01.016 ↗
51. 10.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00142‐110.1016/S1359‐835X(00)00142‐1 ↗
52. 10.1016/j.addma.2022.10286010.1016/j.addma.2022.102860 ↗
53. 10.1002/pc.2856710.1002/pc.28567 ↗