journal article·2017-10Open access

The effects of pH, time and temperature on the stability and viscosity of cellulose nanocrystal (CNC) dispersions: implications for use in enhanced oil recovery

Silje N. Molnes, Kristofer G. Paso, Skule Strand, Kristin Syverud

Cellulose· Volume 24· Issue 10

Abstract

Cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) are currently being investigated as potential additives for enhanced oil recovery (EOR). Presented in this paper is a study investigating the effects of different physical and chemical environments that low concentration CNC dispersions may be subjected to at oil reservoir conditions. Different concentrations of CNC dispersed in de-ionized water and in a 1000 ppm NaCl brine were subjected to variations in pH and temperature, and the results showed that the dispersions remained stable in the pH range expected in oil reservoirs (between 5 and 9). Stable dispersions were also observed when heated to temperatures ranging from 50 to 90 °C. At extended heat aging at 90 and 120 °C for seven days; beginning degradation was observed for both types of CNC dispersions; with viscosity increase and pH decrease as the most important indicators. CNC dispersed in 1000 ppm NaCl brine was generally more heat tolerant than the CNC dispersed in de-ionized water. The increase in viscosity during heat aging can be very interesting for EOR applications. A fluid that increases its viscosity with heat and time will be easier to inject due to a low initial viscosity, and when the viscosity increases in the porous reservoir, the effect can be a stable waterfront and less viscous fingering, which again can lead to increased sweep efficiency and better oil recovery.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Advanced Data Storage Technologies · Electrohydrodynamics and Fluid Dynamics

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (38)

Show source-provided references
1. Abitbol T et al (2013) Estimation of the surface sulfur content of cellulose nanocrystals prepared by sulfuric acid hydrolysis. Cellulose 20(2):785–794. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-9871-010.1007/s10570-013-9871-0 ↗
2. Battista OA (1950) Hydrolysis and crystallization of cellulose. Ind Eng Chem 42(3):502–50710.1021/ie50483a029 ↗
3. Beal C (1946) The viscosity of air, water, natural gas, crude oil and its associated gases at oil field temperatures and pressures. Trans AIME 165(1):94–115. doi: 10.2118/946094-G10.2118/946094-G ↗
4. Beck-Candanedo S et al (2005) Effect of reaction conditions on the properties and behavior of wood cellulose nanocrystal suspensions. Biomacromol 6(2):1048–1054. doi: 10.1021/bm049300p10.1021/bm049300p ↗
5. Boluk Y et al (2011) Suspension viscosities and shape parameter of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC). Colloids Surf A 377(1–3):297–303. doi: 10.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.01.00310.1016/j.colsurfa.2011.01.003 ↗
6. Camarero Espinosa S et al (2013) Isolation of thermally stable cellulose nanocrystals by phosphoric acid hydrolysis. Biomacromol 14(4):1223–123010.1021/bm400219u ↗
7. Chen L et al (2016) Highly thermal-stable and functional cellulose nanocrystals and nanofibrils produced using fully recyclable organic acids. Green Chem10.1039/C6GC00687F ↗
8. de Souza Lima MM, Borsali R (2004) Rodlike cellulose microcrystals: structure, properties, and applications. Macromol Rapid Commun 25(7):771–78710.1002/marc.200300268 ↗
9. Dong XM et al (1996) Effects of ionic strength on the isotropic-chiral nematic phase transition of suspensions of cellulose crystallites. Langmuir 12(8):2076–208210.1021/la950133b ↗
10. Dunlop A (1948) Furfural formation and behavior. Ind Eng Chem 40(2):204–20910.1021/ie50458a006 ↗
11. Gray D, Rex R (1965) Formation damage in sandstones caused by clay dispersion and migration. Paper presented at the proceedings10.1016/B978-0-08-011908-3.50033-5 ↗
12. Habibi Y et al (2010) Cellulose nanocrystals: chemistry, self-assembly, and applications. Chem Rev 110(6):3479–350010.1021/cr900339w ↗
13. Heggset EB et al (2017) Temperature stability of nanocellulose dispersions. Carbohydr Polym 157:114–121. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.07710.1016/j.carbpol.2016.09.077 ↗
14. Jahn F et al (2008) Exploration hydrocarbon exploration and production, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 21–22
15. Julien S et al (1993) Influence of acid pretreatment (H2SO4, HCl, HNO3) on reaction selectivity in the vacuum pyrolysis of cellulose. J Anal Appl Pyrol 27(1):25–43. doi: 10.1016/0165-2370(93)80020-Z10.1016/0165-2370(93)80020-Z ↗
16. Klemm D et al (2011) Nanocelluloses: a new family of nature-based materials. Angew Chem Int Ed 50(24):5438–5466. doi: 10.1002/anie.20100127310.1002/anie.201001273 ↗
17. Lahiji RR et al (2010) Atomic force microscopy characterization of cellulose nanocrystals. Langmuir 26(6):4480–4488. doi: 10.1021/la903111j10.1021/la903111j ↗
18. Leong Y, Ong B (2003) Critical zeta potential and the Hamaker constant of oxides in water. Powder Technol 134(3):249–25410.1016/j.powtec.2003.08.054 ↗
19. Liao C-H et al (2001) Hydroxyl radical scavenging role of chloride and bicarbonate ions in the H2O2/UV process. Chemosphere 44(5):1193–1200. doi: 10.1016/S0045-6535(00)00278-210.1016/S0045-6535(00)00278-2 ↗
20. Łojewska J et al (2007) Carbonyl groups development on degraded cellulose. Correlation between spectroscopic and chemical results. Appl Phys A 89(4):883–88710.1007/s00339-007-4220-5 ↗
21. Lu M-C et al (2005) Effect of chloride ions on the oxidation of aniline by Fenton’s reagent. J Environ Manage 75(2):177–182. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2004.12.00310.1016/j.jenvman.2004.12.003 ↗
22. Marchessault R et al (1961) Some hydrodynamic properties of neutral suspensions of cellulose crystallites as related to size and shape. J Colloid Sci 16(4):327–34410.1016/0095-8522(61)90033-2 ↗
23. Matsuo M et al (2012) Kinetic analysis of color changes in cellulose during heat treatment. J Wood Sci 58(2):113–11910.1007/s10086-011-1235-5 ↗
24. Molnes S et al (2016) Sandstone injectivity and salt stability of cellulose nanocrystals (CNC) dispersions: premises for use of CNC in enhanced oil recovery. Ind Crops Prod 93:152–160. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.03.01910.1016/j.indcrop.2016.03.019 ↗
25. Orts W et al (1998) Enhanced ordering of liquid crystalline suspensions of cellulose microfibrils: a small angle neutron scattering study. Macromolecules 31(17):5717–572510.1021/ma9711452 ↗
26. Payen A (1838) Mémoire sur la composition du tissu propre des plantes et du ligneux. Comptes Rendus 7:1052–1056
27. Rånby BG (1949) Aqueous colloidal solutions of cellulose micelles. Acta Chem Scand 3(5):649–650. doi: 10.3891/acta.chem.scand.03-064910.3891/acta.chem.scand.03-0649 ↗
28. Roman M, Winter WT (2004) Effect of sulfate groups from sulfuric acid hydrolysis on the thermal degradation behavior of bacterial cellulose. Biomacromol 5(5):1671–1677. doi: 10.1021/bm034519+10.1021/bm034519+ ↗
29. Sacui IA et al (2014) Comparison of the properties of cellulose nanocrystals and cellulose nanofibrils isolated from bacteria, tunicate, and wood processed using acid, enzymatic, mechanical, and oxidative methods. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 6(9):6127–613810.1021/am500359f ↗
30. Salopek B et al (1992) Measurement and application of zeta-potential. Rudarsko-geološko-naftni fakultet
31. Sarkar P, Nicholson PS (1996) Electrophoretic deposition (EPD): mechanisms, kinetics, and application to ceramics. J Am Ceram Soc 79(8):1987–200210.1111/j.1151-2916.1996.tb08929.x ↗
32. Shen D et al (2013) The overview of thermal decomposition of cellulose in lignocellulosic biomass cellulose-biomass conversion: InTech10.5772/51883 ↗
33. Skauge T, et al (2010). Nano-sized particles for EOR. Paper presented at the SPE improved oil recovery symposium10.2118/129933-MS ↗
34. Wang SC, Wei WCJ (2001) Electrokinetic properties of nanosized SiC particles in highly concentrated electrolyte solutions. J Am Ceram Soc 84(7):1411–141410.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00852.x ↗
35. Wang N et al (2007) Thermal degradation behaviors of spherical cellulose nanocrystals with sulfate groups. Polymer 48(12):3486–3493. doi: 10.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.06210.1016/j.polymer.2007.03.062 ↗
36. Wellington SL (1983) Biopolymer solution viscosity stabilization-polymer degradation and antioxidant use. Soc Petrol Eng J 23(06):901–91210.2118/9296-PA ↗
37. Will J et al (2001) Electrophoretic deposition of zirconia on porous anodic substrates. J Am Ceram Soc 84(2):328–33210.1111/j.1151-2916.2001.tb00658.x ↗
38. Yatagai M, Zeronian S (1994) Effect of ultraviolet light and heat on the properties of cotton cellulose. Cellulose 1(3):205–21410.1007/BF00813508 ↗