Bacterial-Derived Polyhydroxyalkanoate/Bioceramic Composites in Clinical Practice: State of the Art and Future Perspectives
Source abstract
Abstract
This review examines the current advancements in and potential of bioceramic/polyhydroxyalkanoate (BioC/PHA) composites, emphasizing their growing role in biomedical applications. The integration of PHAs─biodegradable, biocompatible polymers from a bacterial origin─with bioceramics like hydroxyapatite or bioglass offers a unique synergy, combining the structural integrity of ceramics with the tunable properties of PHAs. Such composites demonstrate significant promise in bone tissue engineering, cartilage repair, and drug delivery systems, where they support cell attachment, proliferation, and targeted therapeutic release. The review highlights various methods of manufacturing these composites. Additionally, the review addresses challenges in production scalability, cost, and material purification necessary to meet medical-grade standards. Advances in functionalization, such as drug incorporation and bioactive coatings, are discussed as pathways to customized therapeutic solutions. This review underscores the transformative potential of BioC/PHA composites in creating sustainable, multifunctional biomaterials that align with the clinical demands of regenerative medicine and environmentally conscious material science.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Bone Tissue Engineering Materials · biodegradable polymer synthesis and properties · Graphene and Nanomaterials Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Jerzy Haber Institute of Catalysis and Surface Chemistry, Polish Academy of Science, Niezapominajek 8, Krakow 30-239, Poland
Funding
Instytut Katalizy i Fizykochemii Powierzchni im. Jerzego Habera, Polskiej Akademii Nauk · Narodowe Centrum Badan i Rozwoju
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1007/s00113-006-1152-z10.1007/s00113-006-1152-z ↗
2. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.10.01410.1016/j.msec.2016.10.014 ↗
3. 10.3390/jfb603070810.3390/jfb6030708 ↗
4. 10.1002/jbm.a.3524810.1002/jbm.a.35248 ↗
5. 10.1016/B978-0-08-100789-1.00006-X10.1016/B978-0-08-100789-1.00006-X ↗
6. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.02.07010.1016/j.msec.2017.02.070 ↗
7. 10.1159/00038169110.1159/000381691 ↗
8. Palmero, P. Ceramic–polymer nanocomposites for bone-tissue regeneration. In Nanocomposites for Musculoskeletal Tissue Regeneration; Elsevier: 2016, pp 331–367.10.1016/B978-1-78242-452-9.00015-7 ↗
9. Okada M. · Nano Biomed. · 2016 · 8 · 15
10. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.msec.2016.09.00810.1016/j.msec.2016.09.008 ↗
12. Arinzeh, T. L. Electrospun ceramic-polymer composite as a scaffold for tissue repair. U.S. Patent No. 9,181,636. Trademark Office, U.S. Patent and Washington, DC, US9181636B2 2015.
13. Eftekhari, S.; Bougherara, H. Artificial bone nanocomposite and method of manufacture. U.S. Patent Application No. 15/131, 695. US20160228612A1 2016.
14. Wu H. · 2015 · V001T02A107
15. 10.1088/1758-5090/7/1/01500510.1088/1758-5090/7/1/015005 ↗
16. 10.1155/2015/72907610.1155/2015/729076 ↗
17. 10.1080/09205063.2014.95301610.1080/09205063.2014.953016 ↗
18. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.00210.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.02.002 ↗
19. 10.4252/wjsc.v7.i3.65710.4252/wjsc.v7.i3.657 ↗
20. 10.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.529-530.1910.4028/www.scientific.net/KEM.529-530.19 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.03110.1016/j.actbio.2015.01.031 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.07.01610.1016/j.msec.2015.07.016 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.msec.2013.09.03610.1016/j.msec.2013.09.036 ↗
24. 10.1021/acsomega.2c0559610.1021/acsomega.2c05596 ↗
25. 10.1586/17434440.2015.95807510.1586/17434440.2015.958075 ↗
26. 10.1007/s10853-008-2552-y10.1007/s10853-008-2552-y ↗
27. 10.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.10.01610.1016/j.jeurceramsoc.2006.10.016 ↗
28. 10.1243/09544119JEIM51310.1243/09544119JEIM513 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.02410.1016/j.actbio.2010.05.024 ↗
30. 10.1002/jbm.b.3364610.1002/jbm.b.33646 ↗
31. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.03010.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.07.030 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.lfs.2024.12267110.1016/j.lfs.2024.122671 ↗
33. 10.1007/s10856-011-4374-810.1007/s10856-011-4374-8 ↗
34. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.02410.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.024 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.04010.1016/j.lfs.2016.02.040 ↗
36. 10.1166/jnn.2018.1425910.1166/jnn.2018.14259 ↗
37. 10.1088/1748-6041/7/2/02411310.1088/1748-6041/7/2/024113 ↗
38. 10.3390/ma1424749610.3390/ma14247496 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.09.08110.1016/j.msec.2015.09.081 ↗
40. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.03510.1016/j.ceramint.2024.04.035 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.02.00410.1016/j.biotechadv.2018.02.004 ↗
42. 10.1093/ons/opx28010.1093/ons/opx280 ↗
43. 10.1002/jbm.a.3123710.1002/jbm.a.31237 ↗
44. 10.1515/polyeng-2016-019410.1515/polyeng-2016-0194 ↗
45. 10.1007/s10856-016-5784-410.1007/s10856-016-5784-4 ↗
46. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.02910.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.10.029 ↗
47. 10.1038/srep2247810.1038/srep22478 ↗
48. 10.3389/fbioe.2024.140047210.3389/fbioe.2024.1400472 ↗
49. 10.1002/jor.2460710.1002/jor.24607 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.msec.2015.10.01810.1016/j.msec.2015.10.018 ↗
51. 10.1007/s10853-017-1424-810.1007/s10853-017-1424-8 ↗
52. Morejón-Alonso L. · Rev. CENIC, Cienc. Quim. · 2015 · 46 · 62
53. 10.4012/dmj.2016-29510.4012/dmj.2016-295 ↗
54. Stevanovic S. · Bioceram. Dev. Appl. · 2013 · 3 · 10
55. 10.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.19910.1016/j.ceramint.2016.11.199 ↗
56. 10.1371/journal.pone.007905810.1371/journal.pone.0079058 ↗
57. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.00910.1016/j.actbio.2014.03.009 ↗
58. 10.1166/jnn.2016.1246310.1166/jnn.2016.12463 ↗
59. 10.1186/s12903-017-0348-710.1186/s12903-017-0348-7 ↗
60. 10.1007/s10856-009-3931-x10.1007/s10856-009-3931-x ↗
61. 10.1080/21691401.2018.143984210.1080/21691401.2018.1439842 ↗
62. 10.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.19210.1016/j.matpr.2018.04.192 ↗
63. 10.1016/S0142-9612(97)00069-010.1016/S0142-9612(97)00069-0 ↗
64. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.12515010.1016/j.ijbiomac.2023.125150 ↗
65. 10.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.02210.1016/j.jconrel.2022.09.022 ↗
66. 10.3390/biomimetics701000710.3390/biomimetics7010007 ↗
67. 10.2174/187432500080201010310.2174/1874325000802010103 ↗
68. 10.1186/1423-0127-16-6510.1186/1423-0127-16-65 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.02510.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.11.025 ↗
70. Singh P. K. · Biopharm. J. · 2017 · 2 · 14
71. 10.1021/acs.est.8b0296310.1021/acs.est.8b02963 ↗
72. 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.14127910.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.141279 ↗
73. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0095910.3389/fbioe.2020.00959 ↗
74. 10.1002/jctb.166710.1002/jctb.1667 ↗
75. 10.1039/D1RA02390J10.1039/D1RA02390J ↗
76. Pink M. · 2020
77. 10.1016/j.biortech.2019.12247810.1016/j.biortech.2019.122478 ↗
78. 10.3390/catal1203031910.3390/catal12030319 ↗
79. Yu J. · 2007 · 58510.1016/B978-044452114-9/50024-4 ↗
80. 10.1007/s00253010073210.1007/s002530100732 ↗
81. 10.3390/molecules2611346310.3390/molecules26113463 ↗
82. 10.1155/2014/80298410.1155/2014/802984 ↗
83. 10.3390/ijerph2004295910.3390/ijerph20042959 ↗
84. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.00710.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.06.007 ↗
85. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.05410.1016/j.ijbiomac.2017.09.054 ↗
86. 10.1016/j.bej.2014.10.01810.1016/j.bej.2014.10.018 ↗
87. 10.1007/PL0000903010.1007/PL00009030 ↗
88. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.05.13210.1016/j.msec.2017.05.132 ↗
89. 10.1021/acs.biomac.8b0109310.1021/acs.biomac.8b01093 ↗
90. 10.1080/21691401.2017.137118510.1080/21691401.2017.1371185 ↗
91. 10.1016/0378-5173(87)90119-010.1016/0378-5173(87)90119-0 ↗
92. 10.1007/s10570-017-1235-810.1007/s10570-017-1235-8 ↗
93. 10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00810-010.1016/S0257-8972(00)00810-0 ↗
94. 10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.00810.1016/j.ijbiomac.2021.04.008 ↗
95. 10.1021/ma00118a00710.1021/ma00118a007 ↗
96. 10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00426-X10.1016/S0142-9612(02)00426-X ↗
97. 10.1016/j.msec.2017.12.03510.1016/j.msec.2017.12.035 ↗
98. 10.3389/fbioe.2020.0095910.3389/fbioe.2020.00959 ↗
99. 10.1002/jbm.82027090410.1002/jbm.820270904 ↗
100. 10.17516/1997-1389-002410.17516/1997-1389-0024 ↗