journal article·2023-11-13

Tumor Antigen-Primed Dendritic Cell-Derived Exosome Synergizes with Colony Stimulating Factor-1 Receptor Inhibitor by Modulating the Tumor Microenvironment and Systemic Immunity

Anjali Barnwal, Vidit Gaur, Anindita Sengupta, Witty Tyagi, Sanjeev Das, Jayanta Bhattacharyya

Publisher page

Abstract

Dendritic cell-derived exosomes (Dex) have overcome the disadvantages associated with dendritic cell (DC) vaccines, such as cost effectiveness, stability, and sensitivity to the systemic microenvironment. However, in clinical trials, Dex failed to provide satisfactory results because of many reasons, including inadequate maturation of DC as well as the immunosuppressive tumor microenvironment (TME). Hence, culturing DCs in the presence of a maturation cocktail showed an induced expression of MHCs and co-stimulatory molecules. Additionally, targeting the colony stimulating factor-1 (CSF-1)/CSF-1 receptor (CSF-1R) signaling pathway by a CSF-1R inhibitor could deplete tumor-associated macrophages (TAMs) and myeloid-derived suppressor cells (MDSCs) which are responsible for immunosuppressive TME. Hence, in this study, mDex TA were isolated from bone marrow-derived DC cultured in the presence of a novel maturation cocktail and tumor antigen. mDex TA showed elevated expression of major histocompatibility complexes (MHCs) and co-stimulatory molecules and was found capable of activating naïve DC and T cells in vitro more efficiently when compared to imDex TA isolated from immature DCs. In addition, PLX-3397, a small molecule inhibitor of CSF-1/CSF-1R, was used in combination to enhance the antitumor efficacy of mDex TA . PLX-3397 showed dose-dependent toxicity against bone marrow-derived macrophages (BMDMs). In the B16-F10 murine melanoma model, we found that the combination treatment delayed tumor growth and improved survival compared to the mice treated with mDex TA alone by enhancing the CD8 T cells infiltration in TME. mDex TA when combined with PLX-3397 modulated the TME by shifting the Th1/Th2 toward a dominant Th1 population and depleting the TAMs and MDSCs. Interestingly, PLX-3397-induced FoxP3 expression was diminished when it was used in combination with mDex TA . Combination treatment also induced favorable systemic antitumor immunity in the spleen and lymph node. In conclusion, our findings provide insights into the synergy between mDex TA -based immunotherapy and PLX-3397 as the combination overcame the disadvantages associated with monotherapy and offer a therapeutic strategy for the treatment of solid tumors including melanoma.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Extracellular vesicles in disease · Immunotherapy and Immune Responses · Immune cells in cancer

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Centre for Biomedical Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology Delhi, New Delhi 110016, India

Department of Biomedical Engineering, All India Institute of Medical Science, Delhi 110029, India

National Institute of Immunology, Delhi 110067, India

Funding

Indian Council of Medical Research · Department of Biotechnology , Ministry of Science and Technology · Indian Institute of Technology Delhi

References (50)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1186/s13046-019-1266-010.1186/s13046-019-1266-0 ↗
2. 10.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.00141510.1146/annurev.iy.09.040191.001415 ↗
3. 10.1038/3258810.1038/32588 ↗
4. 10.1146/annurev.med.50.1.50710.1146/annurev.med.50.1.507 ↗
5. 10.1021/acsami.3c0293410.1021/acsami.3c02934 ↗
6. 10.1002/ijc.3066910.1002/ijc.30669 ↗
7. 10.1093/annonc/mdh91810.1093/annonc/mdh918 ↗
8. 10.1038/nrc325810.1038/nrc3258 ↗
9. 10.1172/JCI8113710.1172/JCI81137 ↗
10. 10.4049/jimmunol.166.12.730910.4049/jimmunol.166.12.7309 ↗
11. 10.1038/srep1762210.1038/srep17622 ↗
12. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c0109410.1021/acsbiomaterials.2c01094 ↗
13. 10.1182/blood-2005-01-022010.1182/blood-2005-01-0220 ↗
14. 10.1038/ni85410.1038/ni854 ↗
15. 10.1038/nm0598-59410.1038/nm0598-594 ↗
16. 10.4049/jimmunol.120308210.4049/jimmunol.1203082 ↗
17. 10.3390/cancers1315366710.3390/cancers13153667 ↗
18. 10.21037/atm.2017.02.2310.21037/atm.2017.02.23 ↗
19. 10.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.01010.1016/j.immuni.2014.06.010 ↗
20. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-181610.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-1816 ↗
21. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.0048910.3389/fimmu.2014.00489 ↗
22. 10.1182/blood-2011-09-37921410.1182/blood-2011-09-379214 ↗
23. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-086910.1158/0008-5472.CAN-15-0869 ↗
24. 10.1186/s40425-017-0257-y10.1186/s40425-017-0257-y ↗
25. 10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-059110.1158/1535-7163.MCT-20-0591 ↗
26. 10.1172/jci.insight.12063110.1172/jci.insight.120631 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.10.00410.1016/j.cytogfr.2007.10.004 ↗
28. 10.1038/nri199610.1038/nri1996 ↗
29. 10.1038/nri315610.1038/nri3156 ↗
30. 10.4049/jimmunol.143.4.121010.4049/jimmunol.143.4.1210 ↗
31. 10.1056/NEJMoa141136610.1056/NEJMoa1411366 ↗
32. 10.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.01610.1016/j.ccr.2014.05.016 ↗
33. 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-372310.1158/0008-5472.CAN-13-3723 ↗
34. 10.1186/s12916-015-0431-310.1186/s12916-015-0431-3 ↗
35. 10.1007/PL0001405110.1007/PL00014051 ↗
36. 10.3389/fphar.2019.0062410.3389/fphar.2019.00624 ↗
37. 10.1080/2162402X.2016.116346210.1080/2162402X.2016.1163462 ↗
38. 10.1186/s12943-020-01234-110.1186/s12943-020-01234-1 ↗
39. 10.3389/fimmu.2017.0009310.3389/fimmu.2017.00093 ↗
40. 10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00278.x10.1111/j.1476-5381.2009.00278.x ↗
41. 10.1038/s41416-023-02316-910.1038/s41416-023-02316-9 ↗
42. 10.3389/fimmu.2014.0051810.3389/fimmu.2014.00518 ↗
43. 10.1006/cimm.1996.013910.1006/cimm.1996.0139 ↗
44. 10.1016/S0165-2478(03)00128-710.1016/S0165-2478(03)00128-7 ↗
45. 10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00963.x10.1111/j.1600-0854.2009.00963.x ↗
46. 10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-030910.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0309 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.drudis.2021.01.00210.1016/j.drudis.2021.01.002 ↗
48. 10.1038/nature0720510.1038/nature07205 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.01010.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.010 ↗
50. 10.1084/jem.2009245410.1084/jem.20092454 ↗