journal article·2022-09-12Open access

Melt Electrowriting of Graded Porous Scaffolds to Mimic the Matrix Structure of the Human Trabecular Meshwork

Małgorzata K. Włodarczyk-Biegun, Maria Villiou, Marcus Koch, Christina Muth, Peixi Wang, Jenna Ott, Aranzazu del Campo

Abstract

The permeability of the human trabecular meshwork (HTM) regulates eye pressure via a porosity gradient across its thickness modulated by stacked layers of matrix fibrils and cells. Changes in HTM porosity are associated with increases in intraocular pressure and the progress of diseases such as glaucoma. Engineered HTMs could help to understand the structure-function relation in natural tissues and lead to new regenerative solutions. Here, melt electrowriting (MEW) is explored as a biofabrication technique to produce fibrillar, porous scaffolds that mimic the multilayer, gradient structure of native HTM. Poly(caprolactone) constructs with a height of 125-500 μm and fiber diameters of 10-12 μm are printed. Scaffolds with a tensile modulus between 5.6 and 13 MPa and a static compression modulus in the range of 6-360 kPa are obtained by varying the scaffold design, that is, the density and orientation of the fibers and number of stacked layers. Primary HTM cells attach to the scaffolds, proliferate, and form a confluent layer within 8-14 days, depending on the scaffold design. High cell viability and cell morphology close to that in the native tissue are observed. The present work demonstrates the utility of MEW for reconstructing complex morphological features of natural tissues.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 3D Printing in Biomedical Research · Neuroscience and Neural Engineering · Nerve injury and regeneration

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

INM-Leibniz Institute for New Materials, Campus D2 2, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

Chemistry Department, Saarland University, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

Funding

H2020 Marie Sklodowska-Curie Actions · China Scholarship Council

References (60)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.01110.1016/j.actbio.2011.01.011 ↗
2. 10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.00910.1016/j.exer.2016.07.009 ↗
3. 10.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.10001110.1016/j.bbiosy.2021.100011 ↗
4. Lam K. · 2021 · 1110.1007/978-981-15-5632-6_2 ↗
5. 10.1186/s40662-019-0156-z10.1186/s40662-019-0156-z ↗
6. 10.1167/iovs.11-814110.1167/iovs.11-8141 ↗
7. 10.13188/2334-2838.100001710.13188/2334-2838.1000017 ↗
8. Trattler W. B. · 2012
9. 10.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.01210.1016/j.biotechadv.2014.04.012 ↗
10. 10.1002/bit.2497710.1002/bit.24977 ↗
11. 10.1136/bjo.84.12.135410.1136/bjo.84.12.1354 ↗
12. 10.1097/ICU.0b013e32834371d210.1097/ICU.0b013e32834371d2 ↗
13. 10.1167/iovs.10-634210.1167/iovs.10-6342 ↗
14. 10.1016/j.exer.2021.10847210.1016/j.exer.2021.108472 ↗
15. 10.1167/iovs.17-2217510.1167/iovs.17-22175 ↗
16. 10.1016/j.exer.2016.07.01110.1016/j.exer.2016.07.011 ↗
17. Armitage O. E. · 2015 · 18710.1007/978-3-319-22345-2_11 ↗
18. 10.1038/srep3831910.1038/srep38319 ↗
19. 10.1002/bit.2589910.1002/bit.25899 ↗
20. 10.1002/bit.2620610.1002/bit.26206 ↗
21. 10.1002/bit.2747710.1002/bit.27477 ↗
22. 10.14573/altex.190926210.14573/altex.1909262 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.tiv.2017.02.00610.1016/j.tiv.2017.02.006 ↗
24. 10.3390/bioengineering905019410.3390/bioengineering9050194 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.jfo.2020.05.00210.1016/j.jfo.2020.05.002 ↗
26. 10.1093/bmb/ldv05610.1093/bmb/ldv056 ↗
27. 10.1021/acsami.7b0715110.1021/acsami.7b07151 ↗
28. 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.023510.1089/ten.teb.2011.0235 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.00710.1016/j.cobme.2017.05.007 ↗
30. 10.1002/adma.20110348210.1002/adma.201103482 ↗
31. 10.1089/ten.tec.2018.037310.1089/ten.tec.2018.0373 ↗
32. 10.1002/smll.20180023210.1002/smll.201800232 ↗
33. Xie, C.; Gao, Q.; Wang, P.; Shao, L.; Yuan, H.; Fu, J.; Chen, W.; He, Y. Tendril Climber Inspired Structure-Induced Cell Growth by Direct Writing Heterogeneous Scaffold. Available at SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3321957, 2019.10.2139/ssrn.3321957 ↗
34. 10.1002/adhm.20170031110.1002/adhm.201700311 ↗
35. 10.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.04810.1016/j.actbio.2018.05.048 ↗
36. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.10363110.1016/j.jmbbm.2020.103631 ↗
37. 10.1002/smll.20190087310.1002/smll.201900873 ↗
38. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.10978510.1016/j.msec.2019.109785 ↗
39. 10.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b0145610.1021/acsbiomaterials.8b01456 ↗
40. 10.7150/thno.4790910.7150/thno.47909 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.01810.1016/j.bioactmat.2020.12.018 ↗
42. 10.1088/1748-605X/ab334410.1088/1748-605X/ab3344 ↗
43. 10.1002/adhm.20200208910.1002/adhm.202002089 ↗
44. 10.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.0.co;2-710.1002/1097-4636(200105)55:2<203::aid-jbm1007>3.0.co;2-7 ↗
45. 10.1002/marc.20180005510.1002/marc.201800055 ↗
46. 10.1002/adhm.20200123210.1002/adhm.202001232 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.01910.1016/j.biomaterials.2005.09.019 ↗
48. 10.1063/1.368246410.1063/1.3682464 ↗
49. 10.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.03610.1016/j.actbio.2011.02.036 ↗
50. 10.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.01510.1016/j.actbio.2012.08.015 ↗
51. 10.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-610.1016/S0142-9612(00)00121-6 ↗
52. 10.1039/D0CS01056A10.1039/D0CS01056A ↗
53. 10.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.00210.1016/j.progpolymsci.2010.04.002 ↗
54. 10.1016/j.msec.2018.11.01910.1016/j.msec.2018.11.019 ↗
55. 10.1002/app.4334510.1002/app.43345 ↗
56. 10.1002/adma.20170657010.1002/adma.201706570 ↗
57. 10.1038/s41598-018-19502-y10.1038/s41598-018-19502-y ↗
58. 10.1167/iovs.12-982510.1167/iovs.12-9825 ↗
59. 10.1167/iovs.13-1309110.1167/iovs.13-13091 ↗
60. 10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e10.1088/1758-5090/ab5f4e ↗