Antifouling and Mechanical Properties of Photografted Zwitterionic Hydrogel Thin-Film Coatings Depend on the Cross-Link Density
Source abstract
Abstract
Zwitterionic polymer networks have shown promise in reducing the short- and long-term inflammatory foreign body response to implanted biomaterials by combining the antifouling properties of zwitterionic polymers with the mechanical stability provided by cross-linking. Cross-link density directly modulates mechanical properties (i.e., swelling behavior, resistance to stress and strain, and lubricity) but theoretically could reduce desirable biological properties (i.e., antifouling) of zwitterionic materials. This work examined the effect of varying poly(ethylene glycol) dimethacrylate cross-linker concentration on protein adsorption, cell adhesion, equilibrium swelling, compressive modulus, and lubricity of zwitterionic thin films. Furthermore, this work aimed to determine the appropriate balance among each of these mechanical and biologic properties to produce thin films that are strong, durable, and lubricious, yet also able to resist biofouling. The results demonstrated nearly a 20-fold reduction in fibrinogen adsorption on zwitterionic thin films photografted on polydimethylsiloxane (PDMS) across a wide range of cross-link densities. Interestingly, either at high or low cross-link densities, increased levels of protein adsorption were observed. In addition to fibrinogen, macrophage and fibroblast cell adhesion was reduced significantly on zwitterionic thin films, with a large range of cross-link densities, resulting in low cell counts. The macrophage count was reduced by 30-fold, while the fibroblast count was reduced nearly 10-fold on grafted zwitterionic films relative to uncoated films. Increasing degrees of cell adhesion were noted as the cross-linker concentration exceeded 50%. As expected, increased cross-link density resulted in a reduced swelling but greater compressive modulus. Notably, the coefficient of friction was dramatically reduced for zwitterionic thin films compared to uncoated PDMS across a broad range of cross-link densities, an attractive property for insertional implants. This work identified a broad range of cross-link densities that provide desirable antifouling effects while also maintaining the mechanical functionality of the thin films.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Polymer Surface Interaction Studies · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications · Bone Tissue Engineering Materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Otolaryngology—Head & Neck Surgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
Department of Chemical and Biochemical Engineering, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
Department of Molecular Physiology and Biophysics, University of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa 52242, United States
Funding
National Institutes of Health
References (51)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1002/jbm.a.3595810.1002/jbm.a.35958 ↗
2. 10.1002/lio2.32910.1002/lio2.329 ↗
3. 10.1097/00062752-200001000-0000810.1097/00062752-200001000-00008 ↗
4. 10.1016/j.smim.2007.11.00410.1016/j.smim.2007.11.004 ↗
5. 10.1021/la200227b10.1021/la200227b ↗
6. Rolfe B. · 2011 · 551
7. 10.1208/s12248-010-9175-310.1208/s12248-010-9175-3 ↗
8. 10.1186/s40824-018-0147-510.1186/s40824-018-0147-5 ↗
9. 10.1038/nbt.258010.1038/nbt.2580 ↗
10. 10.1097/prs.000000000000119310.1097/prs.0000000000001193 ↗
11. 10.1016/j.heares.2016.02.00310.1016/j.heares.2016.02.003 ↗
12. 10.1186/s12967-014-0280-410.1186/s12967-014-0280-4 ↗
13. 10.1016/j.heares.2015.04.01910.1016/j.heares.2015.04.019 ↗
14. 10.1002/jbm.b.3318710.1002/jbm.b.33187 ↗
15. 10.1016/j.heares.2016.08.00110.1016/j.heares.2016.08.001 ↗
16. 10.1016/s0168-3659(01)00502-810.1016/s0168-3659(01)00502-8 ↗
17. 10.1002/adma.20140405910.1002/adma.201404059 ↗
18. 10.1002/adma.20090140710.1002/adma.200901407 ↗
19. 10.1021/am501961b10.1021/am501961b ↗
20. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.04110.1016/j.biomaterials.2007.05.041 ↗
21. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0083810.1021/acs.langmuir.8b00838 ↗
22. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.02110.1016/j.biomaterials.2008.08.021 ↗
23. 10.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.03810.1016/j.actbio.2016.03.038 ↗
24. 10.1021/acs.biomac.7b0057910.1021/acs.biomac.7b00579 ↗
25. 10.3791/5096610.3791/50966 ↗
26. 10.1128/iai.01886-0610.1128/iai.01886-06 ↗
27. 10.1016/0267-6605(92)90077-710.1016/0267-6605(92)90077-7 ↗
28. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.06.01910.1016/j.colsurfb.2011.06.019 ↗
29. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.6b0443410.1021/acs.langmuir.6b04434 ↗
30. 10.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.02310.1016/j.actbio.2014.05.023 ↗
31. 10.1021/la500057j10.1021/la500057j ↗
32. 10.1021/la403425d10.1021/la403425d ↗
33. 10.1002/elps.20090047510.1002/elps.200900475 ↗
34. 10.1002/elps.20030559210.1002/elps.200305592 ↗
35. 10.3390/ma809526910.3390/ma8095269 ↗
36. 10.1021/acs.langmuir.8b0193910.1021/acs.langmuir.8b01939 ↗
37. 10.1021/ma981945s10.1021/ma981945s ↗
38. 10.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.00410.1016/j.jmbbm.2011.04.004 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.01910.1016/j.eurpolymj.2008.12.019 ↗
40. 10.1016/s0014-3057(02)00391-910.1016/s0014-3057(02)00391-9 ↗
41. 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.06710.1016/j.biomaterials.2010.09.067 ↗
42. 10.1007/s00396-011-2383-210.1007/s00396-011-2383-2 ↗
43. 10.3390/md1305289010.3390/md13052890 ↗
44. 10.1002/app.3324110.1002/app.33241 ↗
45. 10.1021/bm701301s10.1021/bm701301s ↗
46. 10.1021/ma062237710.1021/ma0622377 ↗
47. 10.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.01610.1016/j.colsurfb.2016.07.016 ↗
48. 10.1021/la301966610.1021/la3019666 ↗
49. Straffelini, G. Friction and Wear: Methodologies for Design; Springer, 2015; pp 21–22.10.1007/978-3-319-05894-8_2 ↗
50. Tim, A.; Osswald, G. M. Material Science of Polymers for Engineers, 3rd ed. Hanser Publishers, 2012; p 470.10.3139/9781569905241.fm ↗
51. 10.1109/tbme.2007.89193710.1109/tbme.2007.891937 ↗