journal article·2016-12

Remarkable increase of paper strength by combining enzymatic cellulose nanofibers in bulk and TEMPO-oxidized nanofibers as coating

Q. Tarrés, M. Delgado-Aguilar, M. A. Pèlach, I. González, S. Boufi, P. Mutjé

Cellulose· Volume 23· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

Cellulose nanofibers (CNF) have been proposed by several authors as a reinforcing additive for papermaking pulps; their use allows one to avoid mechanical refining of pulp fibers, which damages the fibers and reduces their lifespan and consequently recycling cycles. In the present work, use of CNF obtained through enzymatic pretreatment as a bulk pulp additive is studied versus traditional (2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidin-1-yl)oxyl (TEMPO)-oxidized CNF. Results indicate that enzymatic CNF improves the overall paper properties in a similar way to TEMPO-oxidized CNF; however, the enzymatic pretreatment is supposed to be significantly cheaper and environmentally friendly compared with the chemical treatment. Paper reinforced with enzymatic CNF was later surface-coated with solution containing TEMPO nanofibers oxidized with 15 mmol NaClO to further promote the mechanical strength. The results indicate that the combination of bulk addition of enzymatic CNF to the papermaking pulp followed by surface application of TEMPO-oxidized CNF induced significant improvement in the mechanical properties of the paper at lower cost than sole use of TEMPO-oxidized CNF as bulk additive. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first work in which enzymatic and TEMPO-oxidized CNF are combined as paper additives for bulk and surface application to improve overall paper properties
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Nanocomposite Films for Food Packaging · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (52)

Show source-provided references
1. Ahola S, Österberg M, Laine J (2008) Cellulose nanofibrils—adsorption with poly(amideamine) epichlorohydrin studied by QCM-D and application as a paper strength additive. Cellulose 15(2):303–314. doi: 10.1007/s10570-007-9167-310.1007/s10570-007-9167-3 ↗
2. Alcalá M, González I, Boufi S, Vilaseca F, Mutjé P (2013) All-cellulose composites from unbleached hardwood kraft pulp reinforced with nanofibrillated cellulose. Cellulose 20(6):2909–2921. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-0085-210.1007/s10570-013-0085-2 ↗
3. Ankerfors, M (2015) Microfibrillated cellulose: energy-efficient preparation techniques and applications in paper, Doctoral Thesis. Royal Institute of Technology (KTH), Stockholm, Sweden
4. Arbatan T, Zhang L, Fang XY, Shen W (2012) Cellulose nanofibers as binder for fabrication of superhydrophobic paper. Chem Eng J 210:74–79. doi: 10.1016/j.cej.2012.08.07410.1016/j.cej.2012.08.074 ↗
5. Bardet R, Bras J (2014) Cellulose nanofibers and their use in paper industry. In: Oksman K, Mathew AP, Bismarck A, Rojas O, Sain M (eds) Handbook of green materials: bionanomaterials: separation processes, characterization and properties, vol 1. World Scientific, Singapore, pp 207–23210.1142/9789814566469_0013 ↗
6. Besbes I, Alila S, Boufi S (2011) Nanofibrillated cellulose from TEMPO-oxidized eucalyptus fibers: effect of the carboxyl content. Carbohydr Polym 84(3):975–983. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.05210.1016/j.carbpol.2010.12.052 ↗
7. Brodin FW, Gregersen ØW, Syverud K (2014) Cellulose nanofibrils: challenges and possibilities as a paper additive or coating material—a review. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 29(1):156–166. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p156-16610.3183/NPPRJ-2014-29-01-p156-166 ↗
8. Carrasco F, Mutjé P, Pèlach MA (1996) Refining of bleached cellulosic pulps: characterization by application of the colloidal titration technique. Wood Sci Technol 30(4):227–236. doi: 10.1007/BF0022934510.1007/BF00229345 ↗
9. Chaker A, Alila S, Mutjé P, Vilar MR, Boufi S (2013) Key role of the hemicellulose content and the cell morphology on the nanofibrillation effectiveness of cellulose pulps. Cellulose 20(6):2863–2875. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-0036-y10.1007/s10570-013-0036-y ↗
10. da Silva Perez D, Montanari S, Vignon MR (2003) TEMPO-mediated oxidation of cellulose III. Biomacromolecules 4(5):1417–1425. doi: 10.1021/bm034144s10.1021/bm034144s ↗
11. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Tarrés Q, Alcalà M, Pèlach MÀ (2015a) Approaching a low-cost production of cellulose nanofibers for papermaking applications. BioResources 10(3):5345–5355. doi: 10.15376/biores.10.3.5345-535510.15376/biores.10.3.5345-5355 ↗
12. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Pèlach MA, De La Fuente E, Negro C, Mutjé P (2015b) Improvement of deinked old newspaper/old magazine pulp suspensions by means of nanofibrillated cellulose addition. Cellulose 22(1):789–802. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0473-210.1007/s10570-014-0473-2 ↗
13. Delgado-Aguilar M, Tarrés Q, Puig J, Boufi S, Blanco A, Mutjé P (2015c) Enzymatic refining and cellulose nanofiber addition in papermaking processes from recycled and deinked slurries. BioResources 10(3):5730–5743. doi: 10.15376/biores.10.3.5730-574310.15376/biores.10.3.5730-5743 ↗
14. Delgado-Aguilar M, Recas E, Puig J, Arbat G, Pereira M, Vilaseca F, Mutjé P (2015d) Aplicación de celulosa nanofibrilada, en masa y superficie, a la pulpa mecánica de muela de piedra: una sólida alternativa al tratamiento clásico de refinado. Maderas. Ciencia Y Tecnología 17(2):293–304. doi: 10.4067/S0718-221X201500500002810.4067/S0718-221X2015005000028 ↗
15. Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Tarrés Q, Pèlach MÀ, Alcalà M, Mutjé P (2016) The key role of lignin in the production of low-cost lignocellulosic nanofibres for papermaking applications. Ind Crops Prod 86:295–300. doi: 10.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.01010.1016/j.indcrop.2016.04.010 ↗
16. Eriksen O, Syverud K, Gregersen O (2008) The use of microfibrillated cellulose produced from kraft pulp as strength enhancer in TMP paper. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 23(3):299–304. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-03-p299-30410.3183/NPPRJ-2008-23-03-p299-304 ↗
17. Espinosa E, Tarrés Q, Delgado-Aguilar M, González I, Mutjé P, Rodríguez A (2015) Suitability of wheat straw semichemical pulp for the fabrication of lignocellulosic nanofibers and their application to papermaking slurries. Cellulose. doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0807-810.1007/s10570-015-0807-8 ↗
18. Gamelas JAF, Pedrosa J, Lourenço AF, Mutje P, Gonzalez I, Chinga-Carrasco G et al (2015) On the morphology of cellulose nanofibrils obtained by TEMPO-mediated oxidation and mechanical treatment. Micron 72:28–33. doi: 10.1016/j.micron.2015.02.00310.1016/j.micron.2015.02.003 ↗
19. González I, Boufi S, Pèlach MA, Alcalà M, Vilaseca F, Mutjé P (2012) Nanofibrillated cellulose as paper additive in eucalyptus pulps. BioResources 7(4):5167–5180. doi: 10.15376/biores.7.4.5167-518010.15376/biores.7.4.5167-5180 ↗
20. González I, Vilaseca F, Alcalá M, Pèlach MA, Boufi S, Mutjé P (2013) Effect of the combination of biobeating and NFC on the physico-mechanical properties of paper. Cellulose 20(3):1425–1435. doi: 10.1007/s10570-013-9927-110.1007/s10570-013-9927-1 ↗
21. González I, Alcalà M, Chinga-Carrasco G, Vilaseca F, Boufi S, Mutjé P (2014) From paper to nanopaper: evolution of mechanical and physical properties. Cellulose 21(4):2599–2609. doi: 10.1007/s10570-014-0341-010.1007/s10570-014-0341-0 ↗
22. Guézénnec C, Girard F, Dufresne A (2012) Coating of PVOH/NFC blend to develop a barrier packaging board: from lab to pilot scale. In: SUNPAP final conference, Milan, Italia
23. Hamada H, Bousfield DW (2010) Nanofibrillated cellulose as a coating agent to improve print quality of synthetic fiber sheets. Tappi J 9(11):25–2910.32964/TJ9.11.25 ↗
24. Henriksson M, Henriksson G, Berglund LA, Lindström T (2007) An environmentally friendly method for enzyme-assisted preparation of microfibrillated cellulose (MFC) nanofibers. Eur Polym J 43(8):3434–3441. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.03810.1016/j.eurpolymj.2007.05.038 ↗
25. Hubbe MA (2014) Prospects for maintaining strength of paper and paperboard products while using less forest resources: a review. BioResources 9(1):1634–1763. doi: 10.15376/biores.9.1.1634-176310.15376/biores.9.1.1634-1763 ↗
26. Hult EL, Iotti M, Lenes M (2010) Efficient approach to high barrier packaging using microfibrillar cellulose and shellac. Cellulose 17(3):575–586. doi: 10.1007/s10570-010-9408-810.1007/s10570-010-9408-8 ↗
27. ISO (1990) ISO 187, Paper, board and pulps—standard atmosphere for conditioning and testing and procedure for monitoring the atmosphere and conditioning of samples. Last reviewed in 2013
28. ISO (1999) ISO 5267-1, Pulps—determination of drainability—part 1: Schopper–Riegler method
29. ISO (2008) ISO 1924-2, Paper and board—determination of tensile properties—part 2: constant rate of elongation method (20 mm/min). Last reviewed in 2012
30. ISO (2011) ISO 534, Paper and board—determination of thickness, density and specific volume
31. ISO (2012) ISO 536, Paper and board—determination of grammage
32. ISO (2013) ISO 5636-5, Paper and board—determination of air permeance (medium range)—part 5: Gurley method
33. ISO (2014) ISO 2758, Paper—determination of bursting strength
34. Kuutti L, Pajari H, Rovio S, Kokkonen J, Nuopponen M (2016) Chemical recovery in TEMPO oxidation. BioResources 11(3):6050–6061. doi: 10.15376/biores.11.3.6050-606110.15376/biores.11.3.6050-6061 ↗
35. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Dufresne A, Bras J (2012) Microfibrillated cellulose—its barrier properties and applications in cellulosic materials: a review. Carbohydr Polym 90(2):735–764. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.02610.1016/j.carbpol.2012.05.026 ↗
36. Lavoine N, Desloges I, Khelifi B, Bras J (2014) Impact of different coating processes of microfibrillated cellulose on the mechanical and barrier properties of paper. J Mater Sci 49(7):2879–2893. doi: 10.1007/s10853-013-7995-010.1007/s10853-013-7995-0 ↗
37. Liu A, Walther A, Ikkala O, Belova L, Berglund LA (2011) Clay nanopaper with tough cellulose nanofiber matrix for fire retardancy and gas barrier functions. Biomacromolecules 12(3):633–641. doi: 10.1021/bm101296z10.1021/bm101296z ↗
38. Nypelo T, Osterberg M, Laine J (2011) Tailoring surface properties of paper using nanosized precipitated calcium carbonate particles. ACS Appl Mater Interfaces 3(9):3725–3731. doi: 10.1021/am200913t10.1021/am200913t ↗
39. Osong SH, Norgren S, Engstrand P (2016) Processing of wood-based microfibrillated cellulose and nanofibrillated cellulose, and applications relating to papermaking: a review. Cellulose 23(1):93–123. doi: 10.1007/s10570-015-0798-510.1007/s10570-015-0798-5 ↗
40. Pääkko M, Ankerfors M, Kosonen H, Nykänen A, Ahola S, Österberg M, Lindström T (2007) Enzymatic hydrolysis combined with mechanical shearing and high-pressure homogenization for nanoscale cellulose fibrils and strong gels. Biomacromolecules 8(6):1934–1941. doi: 10.1021/bm061215p10.1021/bm061215p ↗
41. Richmond F (2014) Cellulose nanofibers use in coated paper, Doctoral Thesis. University of Maine
42. Ridgway CJ, Gane PA (2012) Constructing NFC-pigment composite surface treatment for enhanced paper stiffness and surface properties. Cellulose 19(2):547–560. doi: 10.1007/s10570-011-9634-810.1007/s10570-011-9634-8 ↗
43. Rouger J, Mutje P (1984) Correlation between the cellulose fibers beating and the fixation of a soluble cationic polymer. Br Polym J 16(2):83–8610.1002/pi.4980160207 ↗
44. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8(8):2485–2491. doi: 10.1021/bm070397010.1021/bm0703970 ↗
45. Sehaqui H, Liu A, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2010) Fast preparation procedure for large, flat cellulose and cellulose/inorganic nanopaper structures. Biomacromolecules 11(9):2195–2198. doi: 10.1021/bm100490s10.1021/bm100490s ↗
46. Sehaqui H, Zhou Q, Berglund LA (2013) Nanofibrillated cellulose for enhancement of strength in high-density paper structures. Nord Pulp Pap Res J 28(2):182. doi: 10.3183/NPPRJ-2013-28-02-p182-18910.3183/NPPRJ-2013-28-02-p182-189 ↗
47. Shinoda R, Saito T, Okita Y, Isogai A (2012) Relationship between length and degree of polymerization of TEMPO-oxidized cellulose nanofibrils. Biomacromolecules 13(3):842–849. doi: 10.1021/bm201754210.1021/bm2017542 ↗
48. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17(5):1005–1020. doi: 10.1007/s10570-010-9431-910.1007/s10570-010-9431-9 ↗
49. TAPPI (2000). T 569 pm-00. Internal bond strength (Scott type)
50. Tarrés Q, Saguer E, Pèlach MA, Alcalà M, Delgado-Aguilar M, Mutjé P (2016) The feasibility of incorporating cellulose micro/nanofibers in papermaking processes: the relevance of enzymatic hydrolysis. Cellulose. doi: 10.1007/s10570-016-0889-y10.1007/s10570-016-0889-y ↗
51. Thomson and Reuters (2016) Web of science. https://www.recursoscientificos.fecyt.es/ . Accessed Apr 2016
52. Zimmermann T, Bordeanu N, Strub E (2010) Properties of nanofibrillated cellulose from different raw materials and its reinforcement potential. Carbohydr Polym 79(4):1086–1093. doi: 10.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.04510.1016/j.carbpol.2009.10.045 ↗