Facile Synthesis of Hollow MnO2 Nanoparticles for Reactive Oxygen Species Scavenging in Osteoarthritis
Source abstract
Abstract
Osteoarthritis (OA) is a progressive degenerative joint disease whose molecular mechanism has not been revealed clearly, and there is still no effective approach to cure OA completely. Recently, reactive oxygen species (ROS) are exposed as an important mediator of OA’s inflammatory response, and it has been regarded as a therapeutic target for OA treatment. MnO2 nanoparticles possess good biocompatibility and can act as an artificial nanoenzyme to scavenge ROS in various diseases effectively. In this study, the modified Stöber method was applied to synthesize hollow MnO2 (H-MnO2) and H-MnO2 was modified with NH2-PEG-NH2, which possesses excellent biological stability and biocompatibility. It induced a change in the articular cartilage structure changes in vivo, with the knee tissue staining and micro-CT scanning of the whole knee suggesting that H-MnO2 nanoparticles could effectively remove ROS and significantly relieve the inflammatory response of OA without obvious side effects. This study reveals the therapeutic effects of MnO2-based nanomedicine toward OA, which provides potential alternative therapeutic options for patients with inflammation tissue.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Nanoplatforms for cancer theranostics · Advanced Nanomaterials in Catalysis · Osteoarthritis Treatment and Mechanisms
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Department of Orthopedics, Tongji Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, 389 Xincun Road, Shanghai 200065, P. R. China
Funding
National Natural Science Foundation of China · Tongji Hospital of Shanghai
References (40)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.11.00810.1016/j.joca.2019.11.008 ↗
2. 10.1007/s00167-019-05836-110.1007/s00167-019-05836-1 ↗
3. 10.2147/JEP.S23747910.2147/JEP.S237479 ↗
4. Zhu C. · Am. J. Transl. Res. · 2021 · 13 · 448
5. 10.1016/j.mcna.2020.10.00510.1016/j.mcna.2020.10.005 ↗
6. 10.1007/s00167-020-06129-810.1007/s00167-020-06129-8 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.12.00310.1016/j.joca.2019.12.003 ↗
8. 10.1016/j.joca.2019.11.00910.1016/j.joca.2019.11.009 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.berh.2014.07.00210.1016/j.berh.2014.07.002 ↗
10. 10.1016/j.joca.2018.05.02110.1016/j.joca.2018.05.021 ↗
11. 10.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.03710.1053/j.gastro.2004.05.037 ↗
12. Williams C. · 2021
13. 10.46747/cfp.670211110.46747/cfp.6702111 ↗
14. 10.1097/MD.000000000002425210.1097/MD.0000000000024252 ↗
15. 10.1177/1759720X2097592710.1177/1759720X20975927 ↗
16. Hofmann S. · Der Radiologe · 1994 · 34 · 1
17. 10.1177/030006052098670510.1177/0300060520986705 ↗
18. 10.1039/D0NR08887K10.1039/D0NR08887K ↗
19. 10.3389/fbioe.2021.60815010.3389/fbioe.2021.608150 ↗
20. 10.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.01710.1016/j.bioactmat.2021.01.017 ↗
21. 10.1016/j.lfs.2021.11903610.1016/j.lfs.2021.119036 ↗
22. 10.1002/jcp.3000910.1002/jcp.30009 ↗
23. 10.1021/acsami.0c1480510.1021/acsami.0c14805 ↗
24. 10.1155/2014/56145910.1155/2014/561459 ↗
25. 10.1016/j.biopha.2020.11045210.1016/j.biopha.2020.110452 ↗
26. 10.1039/D0TB02454F10.1039/D0TB02454F ↗
27. 10.1186/s12951-020-00713-310.1186/s12951-020-00713-3 ↗
28. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0281810.1021/acsomega.0c02818 ↗
29. 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.10487010.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104870 ↗
30. 10.1007/s00604-019-4021-510.1007/s00604-019-4021-5 ↗
31. 10.1039/D0BM01855D10.1039/D0BM01855D ↗
32. 10.1021/am508045310.1021/am5080453 ↗
33. 10.1039/D0TB02514C10.1039/D0TB02514C ↗
34. 10.1039/D0NR03931D10.1039/D0NR03931D ↗
35. 10.1039/D0NR04067C10.1039/D0NR04067C ↗
36. 10.1016/j.bmcl.2019.12685410.1016/j.bmcl.2019.126854 ↗
37. 10.1002/adhm.20190152810.1002/adhm.201901528 ↗
38. 10.1007/s00604-019-3995-310.1007/s00604-019-3995-3 ↗
39. 10.1016/j.msec.2019.11020610.1016/j.msec.2019.110206 ↗
40. 10.1166/jnn.2013.692810.1166/jnn.2013.6928 ↗