journal article·2019-12

Plasmonic Quantum Dot Nanolaser: Effect of “Waveguide Fermi Energy”

Jamal N. Jabir, S. M. M. Ameen, Amin Habbeb Al-Khursan

Plasmonics· Volume 14· Issue 6
Publisher page

Abstract

This study models quantum dot (QD) plasmonic nanolaser. A metal/semiconductor/metal (MSM) structure was considered to attain plasmonic nanocavity. The active region (semiconductor layers) contains the following: QD, wetting layer (WL), and barrier layers. Band alignment between layers was used to predict their parameters. Momentum matrix element for transverse magnetic (TM) mode in QD structure was formulated. Waveguide Fermi energy was introduced and formulated, for the first time, in this work to cover the waveguide contribution (Ag metal layer) in addition to the active region. The high net modal gain was obtained when the waveguide Fermi energy was considered which meant that the increment comes from the material gain, not from the confinement factor. The obtained results were reasoned the high gain due to the change in waveguide Fermi energy in the valence band, where the valence band QD states are fully occupied that are referring to an efficient hole contribution.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Photonic Crystals and Applications · Optical Coatings and Gratings

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (25)

Show source-provided references
1. Chang S-W, Lin T-R, Chuang SL (2010) Theory of plasmonic Fabry-Perot nanolasers. Opt Express 18:15039–1505310.1364/OE.18.015039 ↗
2. Ni C-YA, Chang S-W, Gargas DJ, Moore MC, Yang P, Chuang SL (2011) Metal-coated zinc oxide nanocavities. IEEE J Quantum Electron 47:245–25110.1109/JQE.2010.2073680 ↗
3. Lu C-Y, Chuang SL (2011) A surface-emitting 3D metal-nanocavity laser: proposal and theory. Opt Express 19:13225–1324410.1364/OE.19.013225 ↗
4. Chang S-W, Ni C-YA, Chuang SL (2008) Theory for bowtie plasmonic nanolasers. Opt Express 16:10580–1059510.1364/OE.16.010580 ↗
5. Dwara SN, Al-Khursan AH (2015) Quantum efficiency of InSbBi quantum dot photodetector. Appl Opt 54:9722–972710.1364/AO.54.009722 ↗
6. Li DB, Ning CZ (2010) Peculiar features of confinement factors in a metal-semiconductor waveguide. Appl Phys Lett 96:18110910.1063/1.3425896 ↗
7. Chang SW, Chuang SL (2009) Fundamental formulation for plasmonic nanolaser. IEEE J Quantum Electron 45:1014–102310.1109/JQE.2009.2017210 ↗
8. Kim J, Laemmlin M, Meuer C, Bimberg D, Eisenstein G (2008) Static gain saturation model of quantum-dot semiconductor optical amplifiers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 44:658–66610.1109/JQE.2008.922325 ↗
9. Li DB, Ning CZ (2009) Giant modal gain, amplified surface plasmon-polariton propagation, and slowing down of energy velocity in a metal-semiconductor-metal structure. Phys Rev B 80:15330410.1103/PhysRevB.80.153304 ↗
10. Yu H, Schaekers M, Barla K, Horiguchi N, Collaert N, Thean AV-Y, De Meyer K (2016) Contact resistivities of metal-insulator-semiconductor contacts and metal-semiconductor contacts. Appl Phys Lett 108:17160210.1063/1.4947580 ↗
11. Agrawal A, Lin J, Barth M, White R, Zheng B, Chopra S, Gupta S, Wang K, Gelatos J, Mohney SE, Datta S (2014) Fermi level depinning and contact resistivity reduction using a reduced titania interlayer in n-silicon metal-insulator-semiconductor ohmic contacts. App Phys Lett 104:11210110.1063/1.4868302 ↗
12. Orfanidis SJ (2014) Electromagnetic waves and antennas. Rutgers University
13. Krishnamurthy V, Klein B (2008) Theoretical investigation of metal cladding for nanowire and cylindrical micropost lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 44:67–7410.1109/JQE.2007.910451 ↗
14. Ikeda K, Fainman Y, Alan Shore K, Kawaguchi H (2011) Modified long-range surface plasmon polariton modes for laser nanoresonators. J Appl Phys 110:06310610.1063/1.3638704 ↗
15. Numai T (2015) Fundamentals of semiconductor lasers. Springer10.1007/978-4-431-55148-5 ↗
16. Huang YZ, Pan Z, Wu RH (1996) Analysis of the optical confinement factor in semiconductor lasers. J Appl Phys 79:382710.1063/1.361809 ↗
17. Chuang SL (2009) Physics of photonic devices, 2nd edn. Wiley
18. Coldren LA, Crozine SW, Milan L (2012) Masanovic, diode lasers and photonic integrated circuits, 2nd edn. Wiley10.1002/9781118148167 ↗
19. Chang SW, Chuang SL (2009) Normal modes for plasmonic nanolasers with dispersive and inhomogeneous media. Opt Lett 34:91–9310.1364/OL.34.000091 ↗
20. Kim J, Chuang SL (2006) Theoretical and experimental study of optical gain, refractive index change, and linewidth enhancement factor of p-doped quantum-dot lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 42:942–95210.1109/JQE.2006.880380 ↗
21. Al-Husseini H, Amin H, Al-Khursan, Al-Dabagh SY (2009) III-N QD lasers. Open Nanosci J 3:1–1110.2174/1874140100903010001 ↗
22. Asada M, Miyamoto Y, Suematsu Y (1986) Gain and the threshold of three-dimensional quantum-box lasers. IEEE J Quantum Electron 22:1915–192110.1109/JQE.1986.1073149 ↗
23. Zory PS (1993) Quantum well lasers. Elsevier
24. Abbas MN, Mohammed DS (2015) Quality factor improvement for nano cavity. Int J Comput Appl 127:22–25
25. Yu H, Schaekers M, Schram T, Demuynck S, Horiguchi N, Barla K, Collaert N, Thean A, De Meyer KM (2016) Thermal stability concern of metal-insulator semiconductor contact: a case study of Ti/TiO2/n-Si contact. IEEE Trans Electron Devices 63:2671–267610.1109/TED.2016.2565565 ↗