Effect of tempo and periodate-chlorite oxidized nanofibrils on ground calcium carbonate flocculation and retention in sheet forming and on the physical properties of sheets
Source abstract
Abstract
Nanofibrils (NFC) or microfibrils (MFC) are potential candidates for high filler-loaded papers and board as they are able to compensate for strength loss caused by the filler itself. However, the interaction of nanofibrils and the filler during sheet forming is not yet well understood. The aim here was to examine 2,2,6,6-tetramethylpiperidine-1-oxyl radical (TEMPO) and periodate-chlorite oxidized (DCC) anionic nanofibrils during sheet forming in order to determine their effects on flocculation, filler retention and the strength and optical properties of the handsheets. The experiments were carried out by manufacturing filler-loaded sheets from refined kraft fibres and ground calcium carbonate (GCC) with various added levels of TEMPO and DCC nanofibrils. The results showed that both types of nanofibril caused pronounced agglomeration of the GCC filler, which increased its retention in the paper web. Given the same filler content, the strength properties were the same or slightly better than in a sheet formed without any chemical agent, while light scattering was slightly inferior. Poorer formation seemed to be the explanation for why the increased bonding induced by NFCs was not reflected in obviously better sheet strengths. The physical properties of sheets containing NFC were superior to those of sheets formed with cationic polyacrylamide as a retention aid with the same filler content and level of formation. Thus NFCs seem to be potential retention aids for use in fine paper production instead of traditional polymers.
Source: openaire · Quality: candidate unverified · Source record ↗
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced Cellulose Research Studies · Material Properties and Processing · Electrospun Nanofibers in Biomedical Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (21)
Show source-provided references
1. Guimond R, Chabot B, Law K-N, Daneault C (2010) The use of cellulose nanofibers in papermaking. J Pulp & Pap Sci 34(1–2):55–61
2. Hassan E, Hassan M, Oksman K (2011) Improving bagasse pulp paper sheet properties with microfibrillated cellulose isolated xylanase-treated bagasse. Wood Fiber Sci 43:77–82
3. Hentschel R (1959) Structure-property relationships in synthetic fibre papers. Tappi 42:979–982
4. Huang TC, Fowkes FM, Lloyd TB, Sanders HD (1991) Adsorption of calcium ions from calcium chloride solutions onto calcium carbonate particles. Langmuir 1:1742–174810.1021/la00056a028 ↗
5. Hubbe M, Gill R (2004) Filler particle shape vs. paper properties—A Review. TAPPI Paper Summit—Spring Technical and International Environmental Conference, Atlanta, GA, United States, May 3–5, 2004, pp 130–139
6. I’Anson S, Sampson W, Sevaje C (2007) New perspectives on the influence of formation and grammage on sheet strength. In: PAPTAC 93rd Annual Meeting; February 5–9, Montreal, Canada, pp 141–144
7. Jordan B (1985) Predicting the effect of formation on opacity and scattering coefficient. J Pulp & Pap Sci 11:56–59
8. Kajanto I, Kosonen M (2012) The potential use of micro- and nano fibrillated cellulose as a reinforcing element in paper and board based packaging. In: TAPPI International Conference on nanotechnology for renewable materials, June 5–7 2012, Montreal, Canada
9. Katz S, Beatson R, Scallan AM (1984) The determination of strong and weak acidic groups in sulphite pulps. Svensk Papperstidn 65:795–816
10. Liimatainen H, Visanko M, Sirviö J, Hormi O, Niinimäki J (2012) Enhancement of the nanofibrillation of wood cellulose through sequential periodate–chlorite oxidation. Biomacromolecules 13:1592–159710.1021/bm300319m ↗
11. Nazhad M, Harris E, Dodson C, Kerekes R (2000) The influence of formation on tensile strength of papers made from mechanical pulps. Tappi J 83:63
12. Nordman L, Aaltonen P (1983) Structure of paper. In: Arjas A (ed.) Paper manufacturing, 2nd edn, pp 169–206 (in Finnish)
13. Norman R (1965) Dependence of sheet properties on formation and forming variables., In: Transactions of the 3rd Fund Res Symp, Cambridge, pp 269–29810.15376/frc.1965.1.269 ↗
14. Rattaz A, Mishra SP, Chabot B, Daneault C (2011) Cellulose nanofibres by sonocatalysed-TEMPO-oxidation. Cellulose 18:585–59310.1007/s10570-011-9529-8 ↗
15. Saito T, Nishiyama Y, Putaux J-L, Vignon M, Isogai A (2006) Homogenous suspensions of individualized microfibrils from TAMPO-catalyzed oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 7:1687–169110.1021/bm060154s ↗
16. Saito T, Kimura S, Nishiyama Y, Isogai A (2007) Cellulose nanofibers prepared by TEMPO-mediated oxidation of native cellulose. Biomacromolecules 8:2485–249110.1021/bm0703970 ↗
17. Sirviö J, Nurminen I (2004) Systematic changes in paper properties caused by fines. Pulp Pap Can 105:39–42
18. Sirviö J, Hyväkkö U, Liimatainen H, Niinimäki J, Hormi O (2011) Periodate oxidation of cellulose at elevated temperatures using metal salts as cellulose activators. Carbohydr Polym 83:1293–129710.1016/j.carbpol.2010.09.036 ↗
19. Taipale T, Österberg M, Nykänen A, Ruokolainen J, Laine J (2010) Effect of microfibrillated cellulose and fines on the drainage of kraft pulp suspension and paper strength. Cellulose 17:1005–102010.1007/s10570-010-9431-9 ↗
20. Wahren D (1987) Numerical analysis of the influence of formation on the optical properties on paper. In: International Paper Physics Conference in Mt. Gabriel, Canada
21. Xu Y, Pelton R (2005) A new look at how fines influence the strength of filled papers. J Pulp Pap Sci 31:147–152