journal article·2023-02

Underwater Performance Analysis of Perovskite Solar Cells

Manas R. Samantaray, Naba Kr. Rana, Dhriti S. Ghosh, Nikhil Chander

Publisher page

Abstract

Herein, perovskite solar cells are fabricated and tested in underwater conditions in the laboratory. The fabricated perovskite solar cell (PSC) shows an efficiency of 14.29% outside water. It demonstrates an impressive power density of 10.49 and 11.88 mW cm−2at a depth of 10 cm in seawater and deionized (DI) water environment, respectively. Compared with commercial silicon solar cells, PSCs are less affected by the water depth level due to their wide bandgap. The quantum efficiency measurement studies show that the perovskite solar cell is quite unaffected over the 400–800 nm wavelength in underwater environment. On the other hand, the spectral response of silicon solar cell is significantly hampered in the infrared region (700–1050 nm) due to light absorption by water. Absorption peaks of water correspond to the observed dips in quantum efficiency spectra of solar cells, indicating that light absorption due to water is primarily responsible for the decrease in photocurrent and electrical performance in underwater conditions.
Source: crossref · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Perovskite Materials and Applications · Conducting polymers and applications · Quantum Dots Synthesis And Properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

Affiliations

Department of Electrical Engineering and Computer Science Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai GEC Campus, Sejbahar Raipur Chhattisgarh 492015 India

Thin-film & Photovoltaics Laboratory Department of Physics Indian Institute of Technology Bhilai GEC Campus, Sejbahar Raipur Chhattisgarh 492015 India

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1115/1.318382910.1115/1.3183829 ↗
2. 10.1016/0960-1481(91)90100-410.1016/0960-1481(91)90100-4 ↗
3. 10.1002/er.444014080810.1002/er.4440140808 ↗
4. R. J.Walters W.Yoon D.Placencia D.Scheiman M. P.Lumb A.Strang P. N.Stavrinou P. P.Jenkins in2015 IEEE 42nd Photovoltaic Specialist Conf. (PVSC) IEEE Piscataway NJ2015 pp.1–3.10.1109/PVSC.2015.7355644 ↗
5. P. P.Jenkins S.Messenger K. M.Trautz S. I.Maximenko D.Goldstein D.Scheiman R.Hoheisel R. J.Walters inIEEE Journal of Photovoltaics IEEE Piscataway NJ2014 pp.202–207 https://doi.org/10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2283578.10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2283578 ↗
6. 10.1016/0038-092X(92)90123-R10.1016/0038-092X(92)90123-R ↗
7. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.227648410.1109/JPHOTOV.2013.2276484 ↗
8. L.Adoram-Kershner T.Bruce C.Morris R.Holser D.Costa P. G.Flikkema M. W.Shafer inOCEANS 2017-Anchorage IEEE Piscataway NJ2017 pp.1–9.
9. 10.1016/j.energy.2011.08.05310.1016/j.energy.2011.08.053 ↗
10. Rosario L. · IEEE Trans. Ind. Electron. · 2009 · 7 · 2492
11. 10.1016/j.renene.2009.10.02310.1016/j.renene.2009.10.023 ↗
12. 10.1016/j.joule.2020.02.00510.1016/j.joule.2020.02.005 ↗
13. 10.1002/er.724310.1002/er.7243 ↗
14. 10.1002/pssr.20160003710.1002/pssr.201600037 ↗
15. Samantaray M. R. · Appl. Phys. A. · 2022 · 2 · 1
16. 10.1016/j.solener.2022.01.03310.1016/j.solener.2022.01.033 ↗
17. 10.1149/2162-8777/abb00a10.1149/2162-8777/abb00a ↗
18. 10.1002/ente.20210001810.1002/ente.202100018 ↗
19. 10.1021/acs.chemmater.8b0013610.1021/acs.chemmater.8b00136 ↗
20. 10.1002/adma.20150414410.1002/adma.201504144 ↗
21. 10.1002/adma.20140537210.1002/adma.201405372 ↗
22. 10.1002/pip.326410.1002/pip.3264 ↗
23. 10.1038/nmat406510.1038/nmat4065 ↗
24. 10.1063/1.11772310.1063/1.117723 ↗
25. 10.3390/ma1421634110.3390/ma14216341 ↗
26. 10.1016/j.nanoen.2019.10432110.1016/j.nanoen.2019.104321 ↗
27. 10.1016/j.solener.2008.12.00910.1016/j.solener.2008.12.009 ↗
28. 10.1364/JOSA.64.00110710.1364/JOSA.64.001107 ↗
29. 10.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.289666910.1109/JPHOTOV.2019.2896669 ↗
30. Chander N. · 2022
31. 10.1021/acsenergylett.0c0164210.1021/acsenergylett.0c01642 ↗