Practical rule for trimming the DFT-1/2 self-interaction: Band gap, absolute band alignment, and defect properties of semiconductors
Source abstract
Abstract
In recent years, density functional theory (DFT) for material design and discovery has gained significant interest. Traditional approximations with the DFT, like the local density approximation (LDA), tend to underestimate band gaps. On the other hand, the Heyd-Scuseria-Ernzerhof (HSE) method provides better accuracy for band gaps but at a high computational cost. In 2008, Ferreira et al. introduced the DFT-1/2 method, which improves band gap predictions at a computational cost similar to LDA. This method adjusts the valence band energy levels by applying Self-Interaction Correction at the local potential level. The extent of this correction is determined by a parameter called 'cutoff,' which must be self-consistently calculated. Although DFT-1/2 is computationally efficient, it requires extra effort in parameter tuning. Moreover, it may not accurately predict band gaps for certain materials, such as narrow-gap semiconductors. Variations like DFT-1/4 or shDFT-1/2 have been developed to address this issue, providing more accurate band gaps for these materials but reducing accuracy for others. Therefore, choosing the optimal method is essential and material-dependent. To overcome these empirical challenges, we introduce a novel parameter-free approach in the framework of DFT-1/2 (parameter-free DFT-1/2). Unlike the original DFT-1/2, which requires an additional self-consistent field (SCF) loop to determine the cutoff radius that maximizes the band gap, our proposed method calculates the cutoff radius directly from the crystal structure, thus eliminating the need for the extra SCF loop. We validated the performance of parameter-free DFT-1/2 by calculating key electronic properties such as band gaps, effective masses, ionization energies, and electron affinities. We also assessed defect levels in the charge transition states of a silicon point defect in silicon carbide (SiC) for the first time. The results demonstrate that parameter-free DFT-1/2 can reproduce spin density with accuracy comparable to HSE and that parameter-free DFT-1/2 is also effective for predicting charge transition levels in defects.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: ZnO doping and properties · Inorganic Fluorides and Related Compounds · GaN-based semiconductor devices and materials
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
The University of Tokyo
Quemix Inc.
National Institutes for Quantum Science and Technology
Funding
Japan Society for the Promotion of Science · University of Tokyo
References (100+)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRev.140.A113310.1103/PhysRev.140.A1133 ↗
2. 10.1088/0022-3719/20/24/01010.1088/0022-3719/20/24/010 ↗
3. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.49.169110.1103/PhysRevLett.49.1691 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.77.11512310.1103/PhysRevB.77.115123 ↗
5. 10.1126/science.115872210.1126/science.1158722 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevB.53.376410.1103/PhysRevB.53.3764 ↗
7. 10.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.01110.1016/j.cplett.2004.06.011 ↗
8. 10.1063/1.240466310.1063/1.2404663 ↗
9. 10.1063/1.240929210.1063/1.2409292 ↗
10. 10.1063/1.224456010.1063/1.2244560 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.156406010.1063/1.1564060 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.240386610.1063/1.2403866 ↗
13. 10.1016/S0081-1947(08)60615-310.1016/S0081-1947(08)60615-3 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRev.139.A79610.1103/PhysRev.139.A796 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.45.29010.1103/PhysRevLett.45.290 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.286710.1103/PhysRevB.25.2867 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.55.141810.1103/PhysRevLett.55.1418 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevA.40.483710.1103/PhysRevA.40.4837 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.34.539010.1103/PhysRevB.34.5390 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.12640610.1103/PhysRevLett.93.126406 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.96.22640210.1103/PhysRevLett.96.226402 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.91.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.91.146401 ↗
23. 10.1063/1.221397010.1063/1.2213970 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.102.22640110.1103/PhysRevLett.102.226401 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.44.94310.1103/PhysRevB.44.943 ↗
26. 10.1088/0953-8984/9/4/00210.1088/0953-8984/9/4/002 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.57.150510.1103/PhysRevB.57.1505 ↗
28. 10.1098/rspa.1969.003810.1098/rspa.1969.0038 ↗
29. 10.1098/rspa.1969.006110.1098/rspa.1969.0061 ↗
30. 10.1098/rspa.1969.006210.1098/rspa.1969.0062 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.161727410.1063/1.1617274 ↗
32. 10.1063/1.368944010.1063/1.3689440 ↗
33. 10.1016/0375-9601(84)91034-X10.1016/0375-9601(84)91034-X ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.86610.1103/PhysRevLett.81.866 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.20110310.1103/PhysRevB.78.201103 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.23.504810.1103/PhysRevB.23.5048 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.83.12110110.1103/PhysRevB.83.121101 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.16510510.1103/PhysRevB.86.165105 ↗
39. 10.1103/PhysRevB.87.16511810.1103/PhysRevB.87.165118 ↗
40. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.12511610.1103/PhysRevB.78.125116 ↗
41. 10.1557/mrc.2016.1610.1557/mrc.2016.16 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.07514510.1103/PhysRevB.96.075145 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.97.04542610.1103/PhysRevB.97.045426 ↗
44. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.03610.1016/j.commatsci.2018.06.036 ↗
45. 10.1021/acs.jpclett.9b0149910.1021/acs.jpclett.9b01499 ↗
46. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.01460410.1103/PhysRevMaterials.6.014604 ↗
47. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.2c0352810.1021/acs.jpcc.2c03528 ↗
48. 10.1039/D3CP02472E10.1039/D3CP02472E ↗
49. 10.1103/PhysRevB.5.84410.1103/PhysRevB.5.844 ↗
50. 10.1103/PhysRevA.3.122410.1103/PhysRevA.3.1224 ↗
51. 10.1088/1361-648X/ac829d10.1088/1361-648X/ac829d ↗
52. 10.1016/j.commatsci.2024.11297810.1016/j.commatsci.2024.112978 ↗
53. 10.1380/ejssnt.2010.4810.1380/ejssnt.2010.48 ↗
54. 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.716510.1103/PhysRevB.18.7165 ↗
55. 10.1039/D0CP02564J10.1039/D0CP02564J ↗
56. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.12640310.1103/PhysRevLett.110.126403 ↗
57. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.100.14640110.1103/PhysRevLett.100.146401 ↗
58. 10.1016/S0065-3276(08)60541-910.1016/S0065-3276(08)60541-9 ↗
59. 10.1016/0301-0104(75)85029-410.1016/0301-0104(75)85029-4 ↗
60. 10.1103/PhysRevB.72.13420310.1103/PhysRevB.72.134203 ↗
61. 10.1063/5.013445910.1063/5.0134459 ↗
62. 10.1063/1.488373710.1063/1.4883737 ↗
63. 10.1103/PhysRevB.78.08520110.1103/PhysRevB.78.085201 ↗
64. 10.1103/PhysRevB.54.1116910.1103/PhysRevB.54.11169 ↗
65. 10.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-010.1016/0927-0256(96)00008-0 ↗
66. 10.1103/PhysRevB.50.1795310.1103/PhysRevB.50.17953 ↗
67. 10.1103/PhysRevB.59.175810.1103/PhysRevB.59.1758 ↗
68. 10.1103/PhysRevB.13.518810.1103/PhysRevB.13.5188 ↗
69. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10803310.1016/j.cpc.2021.108033 ↗
70. 10.1107/S002188981103897010.1107/S0021889811038970 ↗
71. 10.1016/j.cpc.2021.10794610.1016/j.cpc.2021.107946 ↗
72. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.19520510.1103/PhysRevB.89.195205 ↗
73. See http://www.eedevice.com/vasp-half.aspx.
74. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.11510110.1103/PhysRevB.99.115101 ↗
75. 10.1021/acs.jpca.7b0288210.1021/acs.jpca.7b02882 ↗
76. 10.1063/1.511886310.1063/1.5118863 ↗
77. 10.1021/acs.jctc.9b0032210.1021/acs.jctc.9b00322 ↗
78. The theoretical band gap of bulk P is quite sensitive to the crystal structure. For example, Ref. [108] discussed the dependence on the model of exchange-correlation functional used for the structure optimization. To our survey the result using the experimental crystal structure was not available in the literature and we found that PBE, HSE, mBJ, and current DFT-1/2 incorrectly predicted extremely small gap or gap closure.
79. 10.1063/1.362456210.1063/1.3624562 ↗
80. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.15540510.1103/PhysRevB.90.155405 ↗
81. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.23511310.1103/PhysRevB.86.235113 ↗
82. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.118.02640210.1103/PhysRevLett.118.026402 ↗
83. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.07520510.1103/PhysRevB.84.075205 ↗
84. 10.1063/1.481232310.1063/1.4812323 ↗
85. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.09640110.1103/PhysRevLett.112.096401 ↗
86. 10.1103/PhysRev.133.A116310.1103/PhysRev.133.A1163 ↗
87. 10.1143/JPSJ.52.214810.1143/JPSJ.52.2148 ↗
88. 10.1038/nnano.2014.3510.1038/nnano.2014.35 ↗
89. 10.1103/PhysRevB.18.560610.1103/PhysRevB.18.5606 ↗
90. 10.1103/PhysRevB.51.684210.1103/PhysRevB.51.6842 ↗
91. 10.1103/PhysRevB.5.66210.1103/PhysRevB.5.662 ↗
92. 10.1088/0953-8984/6/12/00910.1088/0953-8984/6/12/009 ↗
93. 10.1038/s41598-020-72487-510.1038/s41598-020-72487-5 ↗
94. 10.1021/cm504242t10.1021/cm504242t ↗
95. 10.1063/1.43852310.1063/1.438523 ↗
96. 10.1063/1.512221510.1063/1.5122215 ↗
97. See https://www.quemix.com/en/quloud.
98. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.16513310.1103/PhysRevB.90.165133 ↗
99. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.0c0400310.1021/acs.jpcc.0c04003 ↗
100. 10.1021/acsomega.0c0442010.1021/acsomega.0c04420 ↗