Carrier-induced ferromagnetism in two-dimensional magnetically doped semiconductor structures
Source abstract
Abstract
We show theoretically that the magnetic ions, randomly distributed in a two-dimensional (2D) semiconductor system, can generate a ferromagnetic long-range order via the RKKY interaction. The main physical reason is the discrete (rather than continuous) symmetry of the 2D Ising model of the spin-spin interaction mediated by the spin-orbit coupling of 2D free carriers, which precludes the validity of the Mermin-Wagner theorem. Further, the analysis clearly illustrates the crucial role of the molecular field fluctuations as opposed to the mean field. The developed theoretical model describes the desired magnetization and phase-transition temperature ${T}c$ in terms of a single parameter, namely, the chemical potential $\ensuremath{\mu}$. Our results highlight a pathway to reach the highest possible ${T}c$ in a given material as well as an opportunity to control the magnetic properties externally (e.g., via a gate bias). Numerical estimations show that magnetic impurities such as ${\mathrm{Mn}}2+$ with spins $S=5/2$ can realize ferromagnetism with ${T}c$ close to room temperature.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Theoretical and Computational Physics · Physics of Superconductivity and Magnetism
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Institute of Physics, Opole University, Opole 45-052, Poland
Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
V. Lashkaryov Institute of Semiconductor Physics of National Academy of Sciences of Ukraine, 41 Nauky prospekt, Kyiv 03680, Ukraine
Department of Physics, North Carolina State University, Raleigh, North Carolina 27695, USA
Funding
Narodowe Centrum Nauki · Army Research Office
References (35)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/RevModPhys.76.32310.1103/RevModPhys.76.323 ↗
2. 10.1023/A:101406680843210.1023/A:1014066808432 ↗
3. 10.1080/00018732.2010.53486510.1080/00018732.2010.534865 ↗
4. W. A. Harrison · 1979
5. J. M. Ziman · 1979
6. 10.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.00210.1016/j.mattod.2016.10.002 ↗
7. 10.1103/RevModPhys.82.273110.1103/RevModPhys.82.2731 ↗
8. 10.1038/natrevmats.2017.3310.1038/natrevmats.2017.33 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.97.21660310.1103/PhysRevLett.97.216603 ↗
10. L. D. Landau · Phys. Z. Sowjetunion · 1935 · 8 · 153
11. 10.1109/TMAG.2004.83674010.1109/TMAG.2004.836740 ↗
12. E. A. Pashitskij · Fiz. Tverd. Tela (Leningrad) · 1979 · 21 · 545
13. E. A. Pashitskij · Sov. Phys. Solid State · 1979 · 21 · 322
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.19520510.1103/PhysRevB.63.195205 ↗
15. 10.1103/RevModPhys.86.18710.1103/RevModPhys.86.187 ↗
16. 2010
17. J. Cibert · 2008
18. 10.15407/ujpe66.6.50310.15407/ujpe66.6.503 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevB.66.07520210.1103/PhysRevB.66.075202 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.19520310.1103/PhysRevB.67.195203 ↗
21. 10.1016/S1386-9477(01)00232-610.1016/S1386-9477(01)00232-6 ↗
22. C. Kittel · 1987
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.05441810.1103/PhysRevB.63.054418 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.58.358410.1103/PhysRevB.58.3584 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevB.36.883510.1103/PhysRevB.36.8835 ↗
26. 1972
27. 10.1103/RevModPhys.41.8210.1103/RevModPhys.41.82 ↗
28. 10.1016/S1386-9477(01)00075-310.1016/S1386-9477(01)00075-3 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.63.08520110.1103/PhysRevB.63.085201 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.55.R334710.1103/PhysRevB.55.R3347 ↗
31. 10.1088/1361-6463/abbb4810.1088/1361-6463/abbb48 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.04542210.1103/PhysRevB.90.045422 ↗
33. 10.1038/nnano.2010.27910.1038/nnano.2010.279 ↗
34. 10.1038/nnano.2015.9010.1038/nnano.2015.90 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevB.69.12130310.1103/PhysRevB.69.121303 ↗