Plasma instability and amplified mode switching effect in THz field effect transistors with a grating gate
Source abstract
Abstract
We developed a theory of collective plasma oscillations in a dc current-biased field effect transistor with an interdigitated dual grating gate and demonstrated a new mechanism of electron plasma instability in this structure. The instability in the plasmonic crystal formed in the transistor channel develops due to conversion of the kinetic energy carried by the drifting plasmons into electromagnetic energy. The conversion happens at the opposite sides of the gate fingers due to the asymmetry produced by the current flow, and occurs through the gate finger fringing capacitances. The key feature of the proposed instability mechanism is the behavior of the plasma frequency peak and its width as functions of the dc current bias. At a certain critical value of the current, the plasma resonant peak with a small instability increment experiencing redshift with increasing current changes to the blue-shifting peak with a large instability increment. This amplified mode switching effect has been recently observed in graphene-interdigitated structures. The obtained theoretical results are in very good qualitative agreement with these experiments and can be used in future designs of the compact sources of THz electromagnetic radiation.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Terahertz technology and applications · Plasmonic and Surface Plasmon Research · Quantum and electron transport phenomena
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Kingsborough College, The City University of New York, Brooklyn, New York 11235, USA
Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, USA
Funding
Air Force Office of Scientific Research
References (41)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.3390/s2123790710.3390/s21237907 ↗
2. N. Akter · 2021
3. 10.3390/s1919420310.3390/s19194203 ↗
4. 10.1109/ACCESS.2021.307542910.1109/ACCESS.2021.3075429 ↗
5. M. Shur · 2022
6. 10.4253/wjge.v9.i8.34610.4253/wjge.v9.i8.346 ↗
7. 10.1038/srep0236310.1038/srep02363 ↗
8. 10.1109/TTHZ.2014.236162110.1109/TTHZ.2014.2361621 ↗
9. 10.1007/s13204-012-0172-y10.1007/s13204-012-0172-y ↗
10. 10.1016/j.pquantelec.2021.10036310.1016/j.pquantelec.2021.100363 ↗
11. H. Sugiyama · NTT Tech. Rev. · 2011 · 9 · 110.53829/ntr201110fa2 ↗
12. 10.1063/1.504765910.1063/1.5047659 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-019-13490-x10.1038/s41467-019-13490-x ↗
14. 10.1109/JSEN.2020.302280910.1109/JSEN.2020.3022809 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.71.246510.1103/PhysRevLett.71.2465 ↗
16. 10.1002/pssa.20052101810.1002/pssa.200521018 ↗
17. M. Shur · IEEE Photon. Soc. News. · 2019 · 33 · 4
18. 10.1142/S012915641550002010.1142/S0129156415500020 ↗
19. 10.1088/0953-8984/20/38/38420610.1088/0953-8984/20/38/384206 ↗
20. K. Tamura · 2021
21. 10.1063/1.472627310.1063/1.4726273 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.19531510.1103/PhysRevB.93.195315 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevB.99.19543710.1103/PhysRevB.99.195437 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.101.24540410.1103/PhysRevB.101.245404 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevX.10.03100410.1103/PhysRevX.10.031004 ↗
26. 10.3389/fphy.2021.72680610.3389/fphy.2021.726806 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.93.07542210.1103/PhysRevB.93.075422 ↗
28. 10.1063/1.492896910.1063/1.4928969 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.86.23531610.1103/PhysRevB.86.235316 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.95.04540510.1103/PhysRevB.95.045405 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.11542610.1103/PhysRevB.92.115426 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevB.104.15544010.1103/PhysRevB.104.155440 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.24544410.1103/PhysRevB.88.245444 ↗
34. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.12532810.1103/PhysRevB.73.125328 ↗
35. 10.1038/nphoton.2012.26210.1038/nphoton.2012.262 ↗
36. 10.1063/5.006907210.1063/5.0069072 ↗
37. 10.1109/ACCESS.2020.298227510.1109/ACCESS.2020.2982275 ↗
38. M. Shur · 2020
39. 10.1109/TED.2020.302753010.1109/TED.2020.3027530 ↗
40. 10.1364/OE.45232410.1364/OE.452324 ↗
41. P. Morse · 1953