journal article·2016-02-26Open access

Characterization of an exchange-based two-qubit gate for resonant exchange qubits

Matthew P. Wardrop, Andrew C. Doherty

Physical Review B· Volume 93· Issue 7

Abstract

Resonant exchange qubits are a promising addition to the family of experimentally implemented encodings of single qubits using semiconductor quantum dots. We have shown previously that it ought to be straightforward to perform a CPHASE gate between two resonant exchange qubits with a single exchange pulse. This approach uses energy gaps to suppress leakage rather than conventional pulse sequences. In this paper we present analysis and simulations of our proposed two-qubit gate subject to charge and Overhauser field noise at levels observed in current experiments. Our main result is that we expect implementations of our two-qubit gate to achieve high fidelities, with errors at the percent level and gate times comparable to single-qubit operations. As such, exchange-coupled resonant exchange qubits remain an attractive approach for quantum computing.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Quantum Information and Cryptography · Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (44)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevA.57.12010.1103/PhysRevA.57.120 ↗
2. 10.1126/science.111695510.1126/science.1116955 ↗
3. 10.1038/nature0506510.1038/nature05065 ↗
4. 10.1126/science.114809210.1126/science.1148092 ↗
5. 10.1038/nphys105310.1038/nphys1053 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.16050310.1103/PhysRevLett.103.160503 ↗
7. 10.1038/nphys142410.1038/nphys1424 ↗
8. 10.1126/science.121769210.1126/science.1217692 ↗
9. 10.1103/PhysRevB.82.07540310.1103/PhysRevB.82.075403 ↗
10. 10.1038/nphys214910.1038/nphys2149 ↗
11. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.05050110.1103/PhysRevLett.111.050501 ↗
12. 10.1146/annurev-conmatphys-030212-18424810.1146/annurev-conmatphys-030212-184248 ↗
13. 10.1038/3504254110.1038/35042541 ↗
14. 10.1038/nnano.2013.16810.1038/nnano.2013.168 ↗
15. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.16130310.1103/PhysRevB.88.161303 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.12540910.1103/PhysRevB.92.125409 ↗
17. 10.1103/PhysRevX.4.01101210.1103/PhysRevX.4.011012 ↗
18. 10.1007/s11128-005-4480-y10.1007/s11128-005-4480-y ↗
19. B. H. Fong · Quant. Inf. Comput. · 2011 · 11 · 1003
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.08531410.1103/PhysRevB.89.085314 ↗
21. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.04530610.1103/PhysRevB.90.045306 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.01030310.1103/PhysRevA.93.010303 ↗
23. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.05050210.1103/PhysRevLett.111.050502 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.20543410.1103/PhysRevB.91.205434 ↗
25. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.111.05050310.1103/PhysRevLett.111.050503 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.04541810.1103/PhysRevB.90.045418 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.14680410.1103/PhysRevLett.110.146804 ↗
28. C. Cohen-Tannoudji · 2008
29. 10.1103/PhysRevA.60.188810.1103/PhysRevA.60.1888 ↗
30. 10.1016/S0375-9601(02)01272-010.1016/S0375-9601(02)01272-0 ↗
31. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.24050410.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240504 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.24050310.1103/PhysRevLett.112.240503 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevA.91.05230610.1103/PhysRevA.91.052306 ↗
34. 10.1063/1.272273410.1063/1.2722734 ↗
35. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.101.23680310.1103/PhysRevLett.101.236803 ↗
36. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.16543210.1103/PhysRevB.91.165432 ↗
37. 10.1103/PhysRevB.76.03531510.1103/PhysRevB.76.035315 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.04530810.1103/PhysRevB.90.045308 ↗
39. 10.1126/science.115922110.1126/science.1159221 ↗
40. 10.1038/nnano.2013.6710.1038/nnano.2013.67 ↗
41. 10.1103/PhysRevB.90.04540410.1103/PhysRevB.90.045404 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.03542310.1103/PhysRevB.89.035423 ↗
43. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.08540310.1103/PhysRevB.89.085403 ↗
44. 10.1038/ncomms868210.1038/ncomms8682 ↗