journal article·2020-09-08Open access

Effects of material thickness and surrounding dielectric medium on Coulomb interactions and two-dimensional excitons

F. García Flórez, Laurens D. A. Siebbeles, H. T. C. Stoof

Physical Review B· Volume 102· Issue 12

Abstract

We examine the impact of quantum confinement on the interaction potential between two charges in two-dimensional semiconductor nanosheets in solution. The resulting effective potential depends on two length scales, namely, the thickness $d$ and an emergent length scale ${d}*\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\epsilon}d/{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{\text{sol}}$, where $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ is the permittivity of the nanosheet and ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{\text{sol}}$ is the permittivity of the solvent. In particular, quantum confinement, and not electrostatics, is responsible for the logarithmic behavior of the effective potential for separations smaller than $d$, instead of the one-over-distance bulk Coulomb interaction. Finally, we corroborate that the exciton binding energy also depends on the two-dimensional Bohr radius ${a}0$ in addition to the length scales $d$ and ${d}*$ and analyze the consequences of this dependence.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · ZnO doping and properties

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (31)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-019-12180-y10.1038/s41467-019-12180-y ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl401544y10.1021/nl401544y ↗
5. 10.1021/nn500064s10.1021/nn500064s ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2017.20910.1038/nnano.2017.209 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0013610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00136 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.19710.1038/nphoton.2015.197 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.27110.1038/nphoton.2014.271 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aac552310.1126/science.aac5523 ↗
11. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.18610.1038/nphoton.2010.186 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2014.21310.1038/nnano.2014.213 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-017-00198-z10.1038/s41467-017-00198-z ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1262910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12629 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0208510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02085 ↗
16. N. S. Rytova · Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. · 1967 · 3 · 18
17. L. V. Keldysh · Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. · 1979 · 29 · 658
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.631010.1103/PhysRevB.25.6310 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.231210.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2312 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.08540610.1103/PhysRevB.84.085406 ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-2313(85)90080-810.1016/0022-2313(85)90080-8 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.24512310.1103/PhysRevB.92.245123 ↗
23. 10.1038/srep3984410.1038/srep39844 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.03513110.1103/PhysRevB.96.035131 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0084010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00840 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.25740210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.257402 ↗
27. H. T. C. Stoof · 2009
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.24530210.1103/PhysRevB.100.245302 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.03530710.1103/PhysRevB.89.035307 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.118610.1103/PhysRevA.43.1186 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.150386810.1063/1.1503868 ↗