Effects of material thickness and surrounding dielectric medium on Coulomb interactions and two-dimensional excitons
Source abstract
Abstract
We examine the impact of quantum confinement on the interaction potential between two charges in two-dimensional semiconductor nanosheets in solution. The resulting effective potential depends on two length scales, namely, the thickness $d$ and an emergent length scale ${d}*\ensuremath{\equiv}\ensuremath{\epsilon}d/{\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{\text{sol}}$, where $\ensuremath{\epsilon}$ is the permittivity of the nanosheet and ${\ensuremath{\epsilon}}_{\text{sol}}$ is the permittivity of the solvent. In particular, quantum confinement, and not electrostatics, is responsible for the logarithmic behavior of the effective potential for separations smaller than $d$, instead of the one-over-distance bulk Coulomb interaction. Finally, we corroborate that the exciton binding energy also depends on the two-dimensional Bohr radius ${a}0$ in addition to the length scales $d$ and ${d}*$ and analyze the consequences of this dependence.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: 2D Materials and Applications · Perovskite Materials and Applications · ZnO doping and properties
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
References (31)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1038/s41467-019-12180-y10.1038/s41467-019-12180-y ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.105.13680510.1103/PhysRevLett.105.136805 ↗
3. 10.1038/nnano.2012.19310.1038/nnano.2012.193 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl401544y10.1021/nl401544y ↗
5. 10.1021/nn500064s10.1021/nn500064s ↗
6. 10.1038/nnano.2017.20910.1038/nnano.2017.209 ↗
7. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.6b0013610.1021/acs.chemrev.6b00136 ↗
8. 10.1038/nphoton.2015.19710.1038/nphoton.2015.197 ↗
9. 10.1038/nphoton.2014.27110.1038/nphoton.2014.271 ↗
10. 10.1126/science.aac552310.1126/science.aac5523 ↗
11. 10.1038/nphoton.2010.18610.1038/nphoton.2010.186 ↗
12. 10.1038/nnano.2014.21310.1038/nnano.2014.213 ↗
13. 10.1038/s41467-017-00198-z10.1038/s41467-017-00198-z ↗
14. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.7b1262910.1021/acs.jpcc.7b12629 ↗
15. 10.1021/acs.jpcc.9b0208510.1021/acs.jpcc.9b02085 ↗
16. N. S. Rytova · Moscow Univ. Phys. Bull. · 1967 · 3 · 18
17. L. V. Keldysh · Sov. J. Exp. Theor. Phys. Lett. · 1979 · 29 · 658
18. 10.1103/PhysRevB.25.631010.1103/PhysRevB.25.6310 ↗
19. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.81.231210.1103/PhysRevLett.81.2312 ↗
20. 10.1103/PhysRevB.84.08540610.1103/PhysRevB.84.085406 ↗
21. 10.1016/0022-2313(85)90080-810.1016/0022-2313(85)90080-8 ↗
22. 10.1103/PhysRevB.92.24512310.1103/PhysRevB.92.245123 ↗
23. 10.1038/srep3984410.1038/srep39844 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.96.03513110.1103/PhysRevB.96.035131 ↗
25. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.8b0084010.1021/acs.nanolett.8b00840 ↗
26. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.25740210.1103/PhysRevLett.92.257402 ↗
27. H. T. C. Stoof · 2009
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.100.24530210.1103/PhysRevB.100.245302 ↗
29. 10.1103/PhysRevB.89.03530710.1103/PhysRevB.89.035307 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevA.43.118610.1103/PhysRevA.43.1186 ↗
31. 10.1063/1.150386810.1063/1.1503868 ↗