journal article·2016-05-31

Importance of quantum correction for the quantitative simulation of photoexcited scanning tunneling spectra of semiconductor surfaces

M. Schnedler, R. E. Dunin-Borkowski, Ph. Ebert

Physical Review B· Volume 93· Issue 19
Publisher page

Abstract

Photoexcited scanning tunneling spectroscopy is a promising technique for the determination of carrier concentrations, surface photovoltages, and potentials of semiconductors with atomic spatial resolution. However, extraction of the desired quantities requires computation of the electrostatic potential induced by the proximity of the tip and the tunnel current. This calculation is based on an accurate solution of the Poisson as well as the continuity equations for the tip-vacuum-semiconductor system. For this purpose, the carrier current densities are modeled by classical drift and diffusion equations. However, for small tip radii and highly doped materials, the drift and diffusion transport model significantly overestimates a semiconductor's carrier concentration near the surface, making the quantification of physical properties impossible. In this paper, we apply quantum correction to the drift and diffusion model, in order to account for the so-called quantum compressibility, i.e., reduced compressibility of the carrier gas due to the Pauli principle, in the region of the tip-induced band bending. We compare carrier concentrations, potentials, and tunnel currents derived with and without quantum correction for $\mathrm{GaN}(10\overline{1}0)$ and GaAs(110) surfaces to demonstrate its necessity.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline

Research context

OpenAlex topics: Semiconductor Quantum Structures and Devices · Quantum and electron transport phenomena · Advanced Chemical Physics Studies

SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.

References (30)

Show source-provided references
1. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.64.105110.1103/PhysRevLett.64.1051 ↗
2. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.65.45610.1103/PhysRevLett.65.456 ↗
3. 10.1016/S0169-4332(97)00480-710.1016/S0169-4332(97)00480-7 ↗
4. 10.1103/PhysRevB.60.R216510.1103/PhysRevB.60.R2165 ↗
5. 10.1063/1.138286910.1063/1.1382869 ↗
6. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.02680210.1103/PhysRevLett.98.026802 ↗
7. 10.1063/1.288873310.1063/1.2888733 ↗
8. 10.1143/JJAP.47.611710.1143/JJAP.47.6117 ↗
9. 10.1016/j.susc.2009.08.00210.1016/j.susc.2009.08.002 ↗
10. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.23530510.1103/PhysRevB.91.235305 ↗
11. 10.1116/1.149153510.1116/1.1491535 ↗
12. 10.1103/PhysRevB.65.19531810.1103/PhysRevB.65.195318 ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevB.67.16532710.1103/PhysRevB.67.165327 ↗
14. 10.1103/PhysRevB.73.03531010.1103/PhysRevB.73.035310 ↗
15. 10.1063/1.317732910.1063/1.3177329 ↗
16. 10.1103/PhysRevB.91.20530910.1103/PhysRevB.91.205309 ↗
17. 10.1109/T-ED.1969.1656610.1109/T-ED.1969.16566 ↗
18. S. Selberherr · 198410.1007/978-3-7091-8752-4 ↗
19. F. Schwabl · 200210.1007/978-3-662-04702-6 ↗
20. 10.1007/s10825-011-0356-910.1007/s10825-011-0356-9 ↗
21. N. L. Rowsey · 2010
22. A. Jüngel · 2011
23. 10.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.02910.1016/j.jcp.2004.10.029 ↗
24. 10.1103/PhysRevB.35.795910.1103/PhysRevB.35.7959 ↗
25. J. F. Creemer · 2011
26. 10.1063/1.8969710.1063/1.89697 ↗
27. 10.1103/PhysRevB.14.55610.1103/PhysRevB.14.556 ↗
28. 10.1103/PhysRevB.30.482810.1103/PhysRevB.30.4828 ↗
29. 10.1002/adma.20130628110.1002/adma.201306281 ↗
30. 10.1103/PhysRevB.80.07532010.1103/PhysRevB.80.075320 ↗