3D Strain Imaging of a Heterostructured GaInP/InP Nanowire Using Bragg Coherent Diffraction X-ray Imaging: Implications for Optoelectronic Devices
Source abstract
Abstract
Imaging the strain in nanoscale heterostructures is challenging since it requires a combination of high strain sensitivity and spatial resolution. Here, we show that three-dimensional (3D) Bragg coherent diffraction imaging (BCDI) can be used to image the strain in a single InP segment within an axially heterostructured GaInP-InP nanowire. We use a 350 nm-diameter X-ray beam, which is smaller than the nanowire but larger than the 180 nm long InP segment. The intense nanofocused beam induced angular distortions, but these are successfully removed by a correction algorithm. Additionally, we show that data from multiple scans can be merged despite scan-to-scan variations. The reconstruction of the merged data set has a spatial resolution of approximately 14 nm, revealing the 3D morphology of the InP segment and its internal strain distribution. The measured strain shows qualitative agreement with finite element method simulations, but with slightly larger magnitude, which indicates a higher Ga composition than the nominal value. The 3D strain map suggests that the nanowire can accommodate the theoretically predicted lattice mismatch without exceeding the coherency limit. Continued development of robust BCDI measurements and reconstructions enables future studies of strain fields and coherency limits in axial nanowire heterostructures, which are critical for designing next-generation optoelectronic devices.
Source: openalex_inverted_index · Quality: baseline
Research context
OpenAlex topics: Advanced X-ray Imaging Techniques · Integrated Circuits and Semiconductor Failure Analysis · Advanced Electron Microscopy Techniques and Applications
SciVX discovery tags are terminology-based. OpenAlex topics are source-provided classifications.
Affiliations
Synchrotron Radiation Research and NanoLund, Department of Physics
Lund University
MAX IV Laboratory
Solid State Physics and NanoLund, Department of Physics
Funding
Svenska Forskningsr?det Formas · Vetenskapsr?det · FP7 People: Marie-Curie Actions · NanoLund, Lunds Universitet · VINNOVA · Knut och Alice Wallenbergs Stiftelse · Olle Engkvists Stiftelse · H2020 European Research Council · Essence
References (55)
Show source-provided references
1. 10.1021/acs.chemrev.9b0016410.1021/acs.chemrev.9b00164 ↗
2. 10.1038/nature1129310.1038/nature11293 ↗
3. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0145510.1021/acs.nanolett.7b01455 ↗
4. 10.1021/nl900055x10.1021/nl900055x ↗
5. 10.1063/1.190310610.1063/1.1903106 ↗
6. Glas F. · 2015 · 93 · 79
7. 10.1038/nphoton.2013.30310.1038/nphoton.2013.303 ↗
8. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.5b0389010.1021/acs.nanolett.5b03890 ↗
9. 10.1002/pssr.20130710910.1002/pssr.201307109 ↗
10. 10.1364/OE.21.01931110.1364/OE.21.019311 ↗
11. 10.1063/1.472994210.1063/1.4729942 ↗
12. 10.1039/D0NR02260H10.1039/D0NR02260H ↗
13. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.90.09610210.1103/PhysRevLett.90.096102 ↗
14. 10.1002/adma.20150418810.1002/adma.201504188 ↗
15. 10.1021/acsnano.5b0129110.1021/acsnano.5b01291 ↗
16. 10.1021/acsnano.0c0742610.1021/acsnano.0c07426 ↗
17. 10.1016/j.cossms.2018.09.00310.1016/j.cossms.2018.09.003 ↗
18. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.112.16550210.1103/PhysRevLett.112.165502 ↗
19. 10.1038/nmat479810.1038/nmat4798 ↗
20. 10.1021/acs.nanolett.7b0402410.1021/acs.nanolett.7b04024 ↗
21. 10.1021/acsnano.6b0812210.1021/acsnano.6b08122 ↗
22. 10.1107/S160057672301040310.1107/S1600576723010403 ↗
23. 10.1007/s12274-020-2878-610.1007/s12274-020-2878-6 ↗
24. 10.1038/s41377-022-00758-z10.1038/s41377-022-00758-z ↗
25. 10.1038/ncomms156910.1038/ncomms1569 ↗
26. 10.1107/S002188981201890010.1107/S0021889812018900 ↗
27. 10.1002/adma.20231067210.1002/adma.202310672 ↗
28. 10.1038/s41563-023-01528-x10.1038/s41563-023-01528-x ↗
29. 10.1126/science.aaa139410.1126/science.aaa1394 ↗
30. 10.1038/nature0486710.1038/nature04867 ↗
31. 10.1038/nmat260710.1038/nmat2607 ↗
32. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.01600210.1103/PhysRevMaterials.8.016002 ↗
33. 10.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.08600110.1103/PhysRevMaterials.2.086001 ↗
34. 10.1557/adv.2018.46610.1557/adv.2018.466 ↗
35. 10.1021/acsnano.2c0607110.1021/acsnano.2c06071 ↗
36. 10.1063/1.496572810.1063/1.4965728 ↗
37. 10.1107/S160057751800503910.1107/S1600577518005039 ↗
38. 10.1103/PhysRevLett.125.24610110.1103/PhysRevLett.125.246101 ↗
39. 10.1107/S160057752400650710.1107/S1600577524006507 ↗
40. 10.1107/S160057671600816510.1107/S1600576716008165 ↗
41. 10.1103/physrevlett.104.22550110.1103/physrevlett.104.225501 ↗
42. 10.1103/PhysRevE.80.02670510.1103/PhysRevE.80.026705 ↗
43. 10.1038/nmat240010.1038/nmat2400 ↗
44. 10.1007/s12274-016-1165-z10.1007/s12274-016-1165-z ↗
45. 10.1364/OE.38606810.1364/OE.386068 ↗
46. 10.1364/OL.3.00002710.1364/OL.3.000027 ↗
47. 10.1038/s41598-020-57561-210.1038/s41598-020-57561-2 ↗
48. 10.1088/0266-5611/21/1/00410.1088/0266-5611/21/1/004 ↗
49. 10.1364/AO.21.00275810.1364/AO.21.002758 ↗
50. 10.30878/ces.v27n2a910.30878/ces.v27n2a9 ↗
51. 10.1103/PhysRevB.68.14010110.1103/PhysRevB.68.140101 ↗
52. 10.1103/PhysRevB.88.14410110.1103/PhysRevB.88.144101 ↗
53. 10.1016/j.jsb.2005.05.00910.1016/j.jsb.2005.05.009 ↗
54. Harauz G. · Optik · 1986 · 73 · 146
55. 10.1016/j.nantod.2016.10.00710.1016/j.nantod.2016.10.007 ↗